mcmentalonthemic
Bronze
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2023
- Posts
- 486
- Reputation
- 914
So xvideos made a new blog post on their blog site pornbiz.com where it's just them crying and propaganda'ing that the porn age verification law that may be passed in the United States is anti free speech.
The law is supposed to protect kids from watching pornography. Ask anyone when they first saw porn. The ages will most certainly be 9-13, maybe even less.
It's also supposed to stop porn addiction as the strongest variable towards whether someone will get an addiction is ease of access to that drug, whatever it may be.
The losers crying:
This one really made me laugh:
Not only that he is probably 70+ meaning he's most definitely an older incel that doesn't have a wife, but..
What the fuck does him being an "IT specialist" [aka IT guy] have to do with your knowledge on this subject? Utter retardation.
"It's the parent's responsibility" this is SO RETARDED.
When the youth were smoking cigarettes -> anti cigarette advertising laws which resulted in the number of youth cigarette smokers getting nuked
And it's funny, when those bills proposing cigarette companies shouldn't be allowed to advertise were proposed, the cigarette companies peddled the same bs -
"IT'S GOVERNMENT AUTHORITARIANISM! THEY'RE OVER-REGULATING THE MARKETS!! MUH DEMOCRACY!!"
Good thing then: nobody believed big tobacco
Bad thing now: LITERALLY EVERYONE BELIEVES THEM ["big porn"]
I don't know if they're filtering the comments but 19 out of 20 comments are retarded gooners crying and crying. The other 1/20 can only be seen if you sort by newest, and it's some guy congratulating the new law that might be put into place with 4 dislikes.
AND WHY DOES IT MATTER IF IT'S THE PARENT'S RESPONSIBILITY.
Retards like this would stop schools from being built because "it's the parent's responsibility to teach their child"
if the government can do something about it, they should [because it's also THEIR responsibility to take care of the well being of their citizens]
if it IS fully the parent's responsibility, then clearly the parents aren't doing enough since people are STILL getting porn addictions.
Porn addicts are the only addicts I can think of that fight tooth and nail to defend the thing they're addicted to.
Not even SEX addicts are this tribalistic over their addiction, and they have more to lose.
that's it, i just wanted to make sure theres other SANE people who know how retarded these people in the comments of this blog post are.
My next post will be that mega guide on nootropics i teases last post, don't expect it anytime soon though
not replying to any replies to this thread, please dm me if you want to ask me a question
EDIT:
hahahha, aka "we only public 'contributions' which fit our narrative" hahhahaa
The law is supposed to protect kids from watching pornography. Ask anyone when they first saw porn. The ages will most certainly be 9-13, maybe even less.
It's also supposed to stop porn addiction as the strongest variable towards whether someone will get an addiction is ease of access to that drug, whatever it may be.
The losers crying:
This one really made me laugh:
Not only that he is probably 70+ meaning he's most definitely an older incel that doesn't have a wife, but..
What the fuck does him being an "IT specialist" [aka IT guy] have to do with your knowledge on this subject? Utter retardation.
"It's the parent's responsibility" this is SO RETARDED.
When the youth were smoking cigarettes -> anti cigarette advertising laws which resulted in the number of youth cigarette smokers getting nuked
And it's funny, when those bills proposing cigarette companies shouldn't be allowed to advertise were proposed, the cigarette companies peddled the same bs -
"IT'S GOVERNMENT AUTHORITARIANISM! THEY'RE OVER-REGULATING THE MARKETS!! MUH DEMOCRACY!!"
Good thing then: nobody believed big tobacco
Bad thing now: LITERALLY EVERYONE BELIEVES THEM ["big porn"]
I don't know if they're filtering the comments but 19 out of 20 comments are retarded gooners crying and crying. The other 1/20 can only be seen if you sort by newest, and it's some guy congratulating the new law that might be put into place with 4 dislikes.
AND WHY DOES IT MATTER IF IT'S THE PARENT'S RESPONSIBILITY.
Retards like this would stop schools from being built because "it's the parent's responsibility to teach their child"
if the government can do something about it, they should [because it's also THEIR responsibility to take care of the well being of their citizens]
if it IS fully the parent's responsibility, then clearly the parents aren't doing enough since people are STILL getting porn addictions.
Porn addicts are the only addicts I can think of that fight tooth and nail to defend the thing they're addicted to.
Not even SEX addicts are this tribalistic over their addiction, and they have more to lose.
that's it, i just wanted to make sure theres other SANE people who know how retarded these people in the comments of this blog post are.
My next post will be that mega guide on nootropics i teases last post, don't expect it anytime soon though
not replying to any replies to this thread, please dm me if you want to ask me a question
EDIT:
hahahha, aka "we only public 'contributions' which fit our narrative" hahhahaa
Last edited:
