Pornography is not to blame for erectile dysfunction, and masturbation only has a weak and inconsistent correlation, according to new research.

[Reckless Turtle]

Results indicated that frequency of pornography use was unrelated to either erectile functioning or erectile dysfunction (ED) severity in samples that included ED men with and without various sexual comorbidities or in a subset of men 30 years or younger (p = 0.28–0.79). Masturbation frequency was also only weakly and inconsistently related to erectile functioning or ED severity in the multivariate analyses (p = 0.11–0.39).

Do pornography use and masturbation play a role in erectile dysfunction and relationship satisfaction in men? - International Journal of Impotence Research

Both masturbation frequency and pornography use during masturbation have been hypothesized to interfere with sexual response during partnered sex as well as overall relationship satisfaction. However, results from prior studies have been inconsistent and frequently based on case studies...

www.nature.com

 

[Alt Number 3]

Message brought to you by brazzers

 

[2d v2]

paid study

 

[Deleted member 1140]

if it isnt why is my dick twice as hard when im off porn and fapping for a week?

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Meanwhile, increased dietary cholesterol consumption positively correlates with ED. It's over for animal product eaters who think that nofap/noporn is going to cure their ED.

The relationship between lipid profile and erectile dysfunction - International Journal of Impotence Research

The objective of this study is to investigate the relation between serum lipids (cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglyceride (TG)) and erectile dysfunction (ED). The experimental methods involved comparison of 100 patients with organic ED (mean age of 43.59±10.51 y), with 100 healthy individuals (mean...

www.nature.com

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666422/

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Message brought to you by brazzers

paid study

International Journal of Impotence Research

 

[Reckless Turtle]

if it isnt why is my dick twice as hard when im off porn and fapping for a week?

Would not having sex for a week also make your dick twice as hard?

 

[2d v2]

Would not having sex for a week also make your dick twice as hard?

jerking off every day drains your nuts, science studies show that after a week of nofap, testosterone production peaks. When you drain your balls it goes back down.

the study is bullshit, so much medical crap is bogus now adays.

 

[Deleted member 20652]

Who cares about ED when you're not having sex anyway

//Thomas DOM

 

[mightyravendark]

Message brought to you by Goldstein et. al.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

jerking off every day drains your nuts, science studies show that after a week of nofap, testosterone production peaks. When you drain your balls it goes back down.

the study is bullshit, so much medical crap is bogus now adays.

> "science studies show that"
> "so much medical crap is bogus"

 

[BoneDensity]

Do pornography use and masturbation play a role in erectile dysfunction and relationship satisfaction in men? - International Journal of Impotence Research

Both masturbation frequency and pornography use during masturbation have been hypothesized to interfere with sexual response during partnered sex as well as overall relationship satisfaction. However, results from prior studies have been inconsistent and frequently based on case studies...

www.nature.com

Meanwhile, increased dietary cholesterol consumption positively correlates with ED. It's over for animal product eaters who think that nofap/noporn is going to cure their ED.

The relationship between lipid profile and erectile dysfunction - International Journal of Impotence Research

The objective of this study is to investigate the relation between serum lipids (cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglyceride (TG)) and erectile dysfunction (ED). The experimental methods involved comparison of 100 patients with organic ED (mean age of 43.59±10.51 y), with 100 healthy individuals (mean...

www.nature.com

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666422/

Good goy, go jack off in your pod and eat ze bugs. Remember, meat is bad for you!

You couldn't make this shit up The memes write themselves @Klaus Schwab

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Good goy, go jack off in your pod and eat ze bugs. Remember, meat is bad for you!
View attachment 1917343View attachment 1917344View attachment 1917345

You couldn't make this shit up The memes write themselves @Klaus Schwab

 

[mogging]

Good goy, go jack off in your pod and eat ze bugs. Remember, meat is bad for you!
View attachment 1917343View attachment 1917344View attachment 1917345

You couldn't make this shit up The memes write themselves @Klaus Schwab

Triggered.

 

[Gonthar]

Do pornography use and masturbation play a role in erectile dysfunction and relationship satisfaction in men? - International Journal of Impotence Research

Both masturbation frequency and pornography use during masturbation have been hypothesized to interfere with sexual response during partnered sex as well as overall relationship satisfaction. However, results from prior studies have been inconsistent and frequently based on case studies...

www.nature.com

 

[Deleted member 21340]

ok but if we can't trust studies conducted by phd students at some of the best universities and laboratories in the world
who do we trust and where tf are we supposed to get info from

 

[RecessedCel5]

ok but if we can't trust studies conducted by phd students at some of the best universities and laboratories in the world
who do we trust and where tf are we supposed to get info from

read the studies , for yourself , don't just read the writer's opinions.

you should take a Stat 101 course also to get what the numbers and terms mean

 

[Gonthar]

ok but if we can't trust studies conducted by phd students at some of the best universities and laboratories in the world
who do we trust and where tf are we supposed to get info from

Well, that's the thing, we can't trust anyone now anymore, more and more "science" is now garbage, just stuff used to push an agenda or promote something, it's the same thing with media and journalism who's now just a propaganda tool.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

who do we trust and where tf are we supposed to get info from

@Gonthar trusts the local gypsies.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Well, that's the thing, we can't trust anyone now anymore, more and more "science" is now garbage, just stuff used to push an agenda or promote something, it's the same thing with media and journalism who's now just a propaganda tool.

The agenda of most universities is to get studies published by the staff so they can build up a reputation and charge incoming students an arm and a leg for tuition.

Your memes are indicative of failing to understand the scientific process and actually challenging the information directly.

 

[Baldingman1998]

Good goy, go jack off in your pod and eat ze bugs. Remember, meat is bad for you!
View attachment 1917343View attachment 1917344View attachment 1917345

You couldn't make this shit up The memes write themselves @Klaus Schwab

My thoughts exactly. Meat bad, soy good, porn good, sex bad, eat ze bugs

 

[Deleted member 21340]

The agenda of most universities is to get studies published by the staff so they can build up a reputation and charge incoming students an arm and a leg for tuition.

Your memes are indicative of failing to understand the scientific process and actually challenging the information directly.

tbh i think its as simple as this dichotomy
i agree with the study = legit
i do not agree with the study = not legit and only published with the objective of pushing an agenda which coincidentally goes against my opinion(s) on the matter

 

[MoggerGaston]

> "science studies show that"
> "so much medical crap is bogus"

Most 'research', especially social/psychological/biological draws all kinds of conclusions that you should NEVER be able to draw from the experiment/analysis that was done.

I study physics, which is still one of the 'better' sciences where this is less prevalent, and the average scientific paper is 40 pages of research/data with a conclusion that usually goes something like: 'we cant draw any conclusions yet, it could be x, y or z. We recommend doing more research.'

But being objective and factual with what your data actually tells you, is something that's generally thrown out of the window in social/psychology/biological studies. They want funding, they want to draw big conclusions, they want to make headlines.
I bet almost none of this is reproduceable.

In the end we just gotta be critical ourselves and not take a 'study' as proof, especially the social/psychological/biological ones.

 

[MoggerGaston]

Anyone here can do stop watching porn and stop masturbating for 1 week and they can draw their own conclusions of how hard their dick is going to get the next time they watch it. I dont need a study to tell me whats real.

porn is evil

 

[FoolOfAGook]

It's not clear from the abstract if these studies are even good (doubtful, horrendous garbage is the norm in [junk]science now). No conclusions can drawn either way (for, or against the claim in title) not even the link says what you have titled this thread.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Most 'research', especially social/psychological/biological draws all kinds of conclusions that you should NEVER be able to draw from the experiment/analysis that was done.

I study physics, which is still one of the 'better' sciences where this is less prevalent, and the average scientific paper is 40 pages of research/data with a conclusion that usually goes something like: 'we cant draw any conclusions yet, it could be x, y or z. We recommend doing more research.'

But being objective and factual with what your data actually tells you, is something that's generally thrown out of the window in social/psychology/biological studies. They want funding, they want to draw big conclusions, they want to make headlines.
I bet almost none of this is reproduceable.

In the end we just gotta be critical ourselves and not take a 'study' as proof, especially the social/psychological/biological ones.

You spent a lot of time writing this essay when you could have just read the methodology and challenged it directly.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Anyone here can stop having sex for 1 week and they can draw their own conclusions of how hard their dick is going to get the next time they have sex. I dont need a study to tell me whats real.

sex is evil

 

[FoolOfAGook]

Most 'research', especially social/psychological/biological draws all kinds of conclusions that you should NEVER be able to draw from the experiment/analysis that was done.

I study physics, which is still one of the 'better' sciences where this is less prevalent, and the average scientific paper is 40 pages of research/data with a conclusion that usually goes something like: 'we cant draw any conclusions yet, it could be x, y or z. We recommend doing more research.'

But being objective and factual with what your data actually tells you, is something that's generally thrown out of the window in social/psychology/biological studies. They want funding, they want to draw big conclusions, they want to make headlines.
I bet almost none of this is reproduceable.

In the end we just gotta be critical ourselves and not take a 'study' as proof, especially the social/psychological/biological ones.

This post IQ mogs this entire forum to hell. Actual science is really hard to do, expensive, time consuming, difficult to control, often times 'unethical'. Calling most studies today science is a disgrace.

 

[MoggerGaston]

You spent a lot of time writing this essay when you could have just read the methodology and challenged it directly.

and do that the next 50 times aswell some study gets posted here? no thanks

 

[Reckless Turtle]

It's not clear from the abstract if these studies are even good (doubtful, horrendous garbage is the norm in [junk]science now). No conclusions can drawn either way (for, or against the claim in title) not even the link says what you have titled this thread.

Did you even read the abstract?

 

[Reckless Turtle]

This post IQ mogs this entire forum to hell. Actual science is really hard to do, expensive, time consuming, difficult to control, often times 'unethical'. Calling most studies today science is a disgrace.

and do that the next 50 times aswell some study gets posted here? no thanks

Just complain about studies without even reading them theory

 

[Gonthar]

Your memes are indicative of failing to understand the scientific process and actually challenging the information directly.