Positive canthal tilt is overrated

.*my*.

.*my*.

Kess mah ess
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Posts
22,318
Reputation
22,541
E59F96D4 9484 4520 8132 41BF444574C0

Chad with positive tilt

6A781AEE 82EA 4AB8 8A4C FA07E41A45A7

Incel with negative tilt
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: OverCoper, Acromegaly_Chad, Lolcel and 10 others
isn't that neutral?
 
what an intelligent thread
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: litaz, Lars, Deleted member 2729 and 7 others
is cantal thilt is slightly negative. It's just like if I said 6foot + is over rated, and then I show a ugly tall fagg, and compare him with a literal mm who is 5'11 3/4.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: onfiresems, Deleted member 2214, spark and 4 others
is cantal thilt is slightly negative. It's just like if I said 6foot + is over rated, and then I show a ugly tall fagg, and compare him with a literal mm who is 5'11 3/4.
There are things that really matter. Canthal tilt isn’t one of them. It’s maybe the number 15 on the list.
 
that guy has pct

its just obscured because of his eyelashes
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: SendMePicsToRate and .*my*.
I don't want to look at that eye area any longer than I have to jfl
Lateral canthus higher than medial canthus, that’s all you need to look at
 
There are things that really matter. Canthal tilt isn’t one of them. It’s maybe the number 15 on the list.
yeah you're right
1614694613888
this guy absolutely don't loose 1psl with negative cantal thilt
 
yeah you're right
View attachment 1017872 this guy absolutely don't loose 1psl with negative cantal thilt
It’s the scleral show and vertical width that makes him look worse. And I’m not saying that canthal tilt doesn’t matter, I’m just saying that it matters so little it’s not even top 10.
 
fair

his eye area is still very good tbh
True. That’s why I’m saying that canthal tilt is overrated. What makes a great male eye area is vertically narrow (probably the most crucial part), horizontally wide, low eyebrows, thick eyelashes and eyebrows, hoodedness and being deep set. Of course, color also matters.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oatmeal
It's overrated on men. On women it's halos them hard like a sexy feline creature
 
  • +1
Reactions: .*my*.

Attachments

  • E6FA97E7-D699-4B59-BEEC-6DC83401E41F.jpeg
    E6FA97E7-D699-4B59-BEEC-6DC83401E41F.jpeg
    44.6 KB · Views: 103
  • Love it
Reactions: pizza
4FD32DE0 90C0 4369 B3C4 42EB9E4EEDBA
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: tyronelite, Deleted member 9819, .*my*. and 1 other person
It's overrated on men. On women it's halos them hard like a sexy feline creature
hella overated on lions too man jeeze
they look so feminine
Male Barbary Lion - License, download or print for £1.24 | Photos | Picfair
Hqdefault
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Growth Plate and .*my*.
Best of the best tier , high effort quality thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: .*my*.
What's the fuzz about? OP's just stating that cantal tilt doesn't have to be a deal breaker, not that it doesn't make a difference.
 
Isn't 5that negative hooding?
 
Eye area is a combination of many factors.

Anyway, pct is a better option.
 
  • +1
Reactions: .*my*.
dogshit thread tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: doll
You're comparing an incelebrity a with bottom 5th percentile face and a instagram model with top 5th percentile face and noticing only a single feature in which the latter mogs him in.
 
  • +1
Reactions: doll, Deleted member 11604 and .*my*.
You're comparing an incelebrity a with bottom 5th percentile face and a instagram model with top 5th percentile face and noticing only a single feature in which the latter mogs him in.
Give that model a positive canthal tilt and he won’t slay any more. Give him blue eyes and the difference would be tremendous, that’s the point.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2214
Obviously there are loads of other factors, doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter tho
 
Just discredit science-backed fact by providing two men who don't even have the mentioned features as an example theory
 
the first guy has neutral tilt
 
Just discredit science-backed fact by providing two men who don't even have the mentioned features as an example theory
Over for stupid blindcels
 

Attachments

  • CAE6D739-7D26-41AC-9282-714675E8F1AA.jpeg
    CAE6D739-7D26-41AC-9282-714675E8F1AA.jpeg
    36.8 KB · Views: 55
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 756
You’re right
Tilt is overrated
He has bug eyes, they’re too close together and pfl is off
But if he had negative tilt he would’ve looked worse, but only slightly. It barely matters.
 

Similar threads

swaggerdoodle
Replies
10
Views
119
ihatewhiterose
ihatewhiterose
Lovecraftscat
Replies
10
Views
526
Alucard69
Alucard69
vratisevojvodo
Replies
8
Views
290
TitusA
TitusA
retardpill
Replies
4
Views
109
yvesstpierre
yvesstpierre

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top