emeraldglass
6'1" Gymmaxed Moroccan ~Head mod~
Staff
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2022
- Posts
- 10,486
- Reputation
- 18,375
From years of analyzing politics and examination of power dynamics. I have learned a lot. Essentially, it's about understanding how power operates. This understanding is quite predictable if you're well-informed about the various factors at play in any given situation. After all, we're dealing with people, and people tend to behave similarly regardless of the scale involved.
In other words, the way an individual acts often mirrors how a state or even a corporation might behave. For instance, when dealing with powerful entities, it's almost like dealing with individuals who might exhibit traits of a psychopath or sociopath. Once you comprehend this kind of behavior, it becomes a matter of common sense.
Here's an example: In the West, particularly America, there's a certain insularity. They struggle to grasp the perspectives of other cultures because they are often confined to their own paradigms, worldviews, and life concepts. They tend to project their own way of thinking onto others, assuming everyone operates like them. This is evident in their strategies, like attempting to induce economic hardship in a nation like Turkey in the hopes that the people will overthrow their government (Erdogan). They employ this tactic because they believe everyone reacts similarly to such pressures.
However, they fail to understand the resilience and unity of the Turkish people when faced with external pressure. The Turks are known for closing ranks and resisting external influence, even rallying behind leaders they might not necessarily like. Americans can't comprehend this because it's a character they cannot relate to or understand.
So, if you pay close attention, their actions often reveal their own weaknesses and vulnerabilities. They use tactics on others that would work on them, assuming that others are just like them. This informs their strategies, but they overlook the fact that what works on them may not work elsewhere.
This dynamic applies to interactions at various levels, even in personal debates or discussions. They tend to attack what they perceive as your weaknesses because these are the very points that are vulnerable for them.
This also often means that they will accuse you of something because it's something that they are either doing or have done. It's confession through projection as they call it, because they know that if you were to accuse them of that thing it would be a weak point for them, it would be a vulnerability. Because they're actually guilty of that thing so they can't help but expose their weaknesses when they attack you.
In essence, their weaknesses dictate how and where they will attack you, and this pattern remains consistent whether at an individual or state level. Their insularity and approach to others inadvertently reveal much about their own character and vulnerabilities.
@TRUE_CEL thought’s of my analysis?
In other words, the way an individual acts often mirrors how a state or even a corporation might behave. For instance, when dealing with powerful entities, it's almost like dealing with individuals who might exhibit traits of a psychopath or sociopath. Once you comprehend this kind of behavior, it becomes a matter of common sense.
Here's an example: In the West, particularly America, there's a certain insularity. They struggle to grasp the perspectives of other cultures because they are often confined to their own paradigms, worldviews, and life concepts. They tend to project their own way of thinking onto others, assuming everyone operates like them. This is evident in their strategies, like attempting to induce economic hardship in a nation like Turkey in the hopes that the people will overthrow their government (Erdogan). They employ this tactic because they believe everyone reacts similarly to such pressures.
However, they fail to understand the resilience and unity of the Turkish people when faced with external pressure. The Turks are known for closing ranks and resisting external influence, even rallying behind leaders they might not necessarily like. Americans can't comprehend this because it's a character they cannot relate to or understand.
So, if you pay close attention, their actions often reveal their own weaknesses and vulnerabilities. They use tactics on others that would work on them, assuming that others are just like them. This informs their strategies, but they overlook the fact that what works on them may not work elsewhere.
This dynamic applies to interactions at various levels, even in personal debates or discussions. They tend to attack what they perceive as your weaknesses because these are the very points that are vulnerable for them.
This also often means that they will accuse you of something because it's something that they are either doing or have done. It's confession through projection as they call it, because they know that if you were to accuse them of that thing it would be a weak point for them, it would be a vulnerability. Because they're actually guilty of that thing so they can't help but expose their weaknesses when they attack you.
In essence, their weaknesses dictate how and where they will attack you, and this pattern remains consistent whether at an individual or state level. Their insularity and approach to others inadvertently reveal much about their own character and vulnerabilities.
@TRUE_CEL thought’s of my analysis?
Last edited:
