Harakiri Fellatio
Solstice
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
- Posts
- 2,297
- Reputation
- 2,498
Progressivism is a cult and a moral dogma. Progressives look at the disparities between white males and other groups and instead of coming to the obvious conclusion which is that differentiating IQs are to blame, (Asians are still massively successful because they're higher IQ. So successful that equity negatively effects them as well)
They instead blame systemic oppression with 0 evidence outside of the preconceived dogma that IQ doesn't matter and everyone is inherently equal. Thus, they push equity which in turn leads to actual talent being filtered out in favor of candidates who barely pass.
Here's an interesting graph.
Blacks with a lower MCAT and BPA are more likely to be accepted into medical school than whites and Asians with a higher MCAT and BPA.
The result of this equity is lowering standards. As those with intelligence are disqualified due to this legal form of discrimination.
American and first world societies are kept together by a complex chain of systems. What happens when the talent that keeps those systems functioning ages out and new talent is prevented from carrying the torch in favor of those who just barely qualify? Here's an interesting article on that. The article that inspired me to write this post
www.palladiummag.com
Then of course we have the other major product of progressivism which is migration. Specifically mass migration. We can see that the most progressive countries have embraced mass migration from the third world. Canada is a good example of this. Even if we ignore the racial aspect of 70-80 IQ individuals becoming the majority of a country once dominated by those with 99-100 IQ, mass migration like this objectively leads to the job market becoming more competitive and housing prices increasing as demand rises.
This means that the quality of life for those living in first world countries will go down over time as the population swells.
If we look at the racial aspect, things become even more grim. If you place someone with an IQ between 70-80 in a first world country that's been built around with a 100 IQ
they won't magically receive a spike in intelligence. If those with an IQ of 70-80 become the dominant demographic in a country that was built by people with a far higher level of intelligence, that country will cease to be first world. Look at any of the previously colonized countries that were freed of their "oppressors" to see this in action.
And of course, despite whatever excuses liberals make, we know that certain ethnic groups are more violent than white people. There's multiple genetic factors behind this we could go into.
We know that black males are more likely to have the MAOA-L gene which is associated with greater predisposition towards violent behavior. We also know that lower IQs on average are associated with more violent behaviors.
However, due to the prominence of progressives in positions of authority, we are not able to address this obvious growing issue in first world societies. Instead, we are censored for simply posting the facts and told that any wrong doing these groups commit is the fault of white man's original sin.
And then we have feminism. Feminism has destroyed birth rates in this country. The equity which we previously discussed, massively benefits women more than any other group.
• women are more likely to be accepted into colleges
• women are more likely to be hired due to equity
• women are more likely to be promoted
The result is that while white men are at a major disadvantage due to legal discrimination, white women are at advantaged financially which leads to less white women reproducing with men for resources. This is not a natural occurrence despite whatever feminists tell you. Throughout history, the majority of women have reproduced with men for resources. When they're given an easy equity job or "jew daycare" as some call it, the result is that women spend their youth scrolling Tiktok, drinking Dunkin Donuts, and being pumped and dumped by Chads in-between the occasional abortion.
All of these things combined do not bode well for the future of first world countries. When white populations drop to an irreplaceable level and ethnics become the majority, these will not be first world countries. United States of America will not be America if its population is largely comprised of Mexicans, nor will Japan be Japan if it's population becomes dominated by Indians.
I suppose, the takeaway from this post is that you should be both upset and thankful. Upset that you were born in a time where the cult of progressivism rots our society, and thankful that you weren't born let's say, a hundred or two hundred years in the future when our countries are completely rotten by decay and mass migration.
They instead blame systemic oppression with 0 evidence outside of the preconceived dogma that IQ doesn't matter and everyone is inherently equal. Thus, they push equity which in turn leads to actual talent being filtered out in favor of candidates who barely pass.
Here's an interesting graph.
Blacks with a lower MCAT and BPA are more likely to be accepted into medical school than whites and Asians with a higher MCAT and BPA.
The result of this equity is lowering standards. As those with intelligence are disqualified due to this legal form of discrimination.
American and first world societies are kept together by a complex chain of systems. What happens when the talent that keeps those systems functioning ages out and new talent is prevented from carrying the torch in favor of those who just barely qualify? Here's an interesting article on that. The article that inspired me to write this post
Complex Systems Won’t Survive the Competence Crisis
www.palladiummag.com
Then of course we have the other major product of progressivism which is migration. Specifically mass migration. We can see that the most progressive countries have embraced mass migration from the third world. Canada is a good example of this. Even if we ignore the racial aspect of 70-80 IQ individuals becoming the majority of a country once dominated by those with 99-100 IQ, mass migration like this objectively leads to the job market becoming more competitive and housing prices increasing as demand rises.
This means that the quality of life for those living in first world countries will go down over time as the population swells.
If we look at the racial aspect, things become even more grim. If you place someone with an IQ between 70-80 in a first world country that's been built around with a 100 IQ
they won't magically receive a spike in intelligence. If those with an IQ of 70-80 become the dominant demographic in a country that was built by people with a far higher level of intelligence, that country will cease to be first world. Look at any of the previously colonized countries that were freed of their "oppressors" to see this in action.
And of course, despite whatever excuses liberals make, we know that certain ethnic groups are more violent than white people. There's multiple genetic factors behind this we could go into.
We know that black males are more likely to have the MAOA-L gene which is associated with greater predisposition towards violent behavior. We also know that lower IQs on average are associated with more violent behaviors.
However, due to the prominence of progressives in positions of authority, we are not able to address this obvious growing issue in first world societies. Instead, we are censored for simply posting the facts and told that any wrong doing these groups commit is the fault of white man's original sin.
And then we have feminism. Feminism has destroyed birth rates in this country. The equity which we previously discussed, massively benefits women more than any other group.
• women are more likely to be accepted into colleges
• women are more likely to be hired due to equity
• women are more likely to be promoted
The result is that while white men are at a major disadvantage due to legal discrimination, white women are at advantaged financially which leads to less white women reproducing with men for resources. This is not a natural occurrence despite whatever feminists tell you. Throughout history, the majority of women have reproduced with men for resources. When they're given an easy equity job or "jew daycare" as some call it, the result is that women spend their youth scrolling Tiktok, drinking Dunkin Donuts, and being pumped and dumped by Chads in-between the occasional abortion.
All of these things combined do not bode well for the future of first world countries. When white populations drop to an irreplaceable level and ethnics become the majority, these will not be first world countries. United States of America will not be America if its population is largely comprised of Mexicans, nor will Japan be Japan if it's population becomes dominated by Indians.
I suppose, the takeaway from this post is that you should be both upset and thankful. Upset that you were born in a time where the cult of progressivism rots our society, and thankful that you weren't born let's say, a hundred or two hundred years in the future when our countries are completely rotten by decay and mass migration.
Last edited:
