Proof that the negroid specimens have lowest IQ of all races

[Slayerino]

 

[PersianKingdom]

Okay retard.

 

[SexuallyAbusive]

ok retard

 

[alligatordude]

Okay retard.

nigga u seriousuly tryna fuck AROUND
buddy i guaranttee you about to get smoked
fuck with me and u doneso


BBBuckkkkOOOOO

 

[Slayerino]

Okay retard.

ok retard

 

[PersianKingdom]

You don't seem to understand the point; if someone has to point it out to you it's too late. It's great to have a malleable brain, but I doubt it if you're religiously watching these videos. You're too far gone into the rabbit-hole.

 

[didntreadlol]

IQ doesn't matter, only looks do

 

[Slayerino]

You don't seem to understand the point; if someone has to point it out to you it's too late. It's great to have a malleable brain, but I doubt it if you're religiously watching these videos. You're too far gone into the rabbit-hole.

All suppositions. The truth is that I like to trigger people with uncomfortable truths.

IQ doesn't matter, only looks do

IQ can give you looks through surgeries

 

[BigBiceps]

IQ doesn't matter, only looks do

With low iq your options to make good money are very limited. You must be godtier to make money just by your looks, and nobody here is on that level.
Iq = money, and money is just as important as looks.

 

[PersianKingdom]

All suppositions. The truth is that I like to trigger people with uncomfortable truths.

IQ can give you looks through surgeries

You seem to want to strongly hold on to the idea that people aren't believing in what you're saying because they're "uncomfortable truths". I couldn't care less if blacks had lower IQs; they're not some incredible "uncomfortable truths" for me to swallow. Regardless, whether or not they have lower IQs doesn't change the fact that you feel the need to post this thread, which in itself is the bigger problem.

 

[puppymaxer]

what we lack in IQ we gain in athletic performance, strength, and low inhib. jfl get mogged

 

[Slayerino]

I couldn't care less

>Keeps replying

Choose one buddyboyo

 

[PersianKingdom]

>Keeps replying

Choose one buddyboyo

You're taking my words out of context and making yourself look like a buffoon. I said I didn't care if they had lower IQs, not that I don't care about this discussion of why you have the need to post it. You seem not to be able to differentiate between the two.

 

[Slayerino]

You're taking my words out of context and making yourself look like a buffoon. I said I didn't care if they had lower IQs, not that I don't care about this discussion of why you have the need to post it. You seem not to be able to differentiate between the two.

Why is that a problem that I point out this universal truth my persian king?

 

[Vermilioncore]

Negroidian Conquest

 

[Ascensionrequired]

Cope. I'd trade 20 IQ for a chad face anyday. Ignorance + GL = happy life.

This + low IQ? No thanks.

 

[PersianKingdom]

Why is that a problem that I point out this universal truth my persian king?

Because it shows how weak of a person you are that you feel better about yourself posting these videos. And it's funny that you call it a universal truth because there's many black prodigies/geniuses that have IQs many deviations east of yours. Anyway, I'm blocking you because it's not worth arguing with you anymore. I have no hate against you; I know your racism is a product of your environment, and that it's not your fault you have such views. I hope you learn for the better, because I know some people have.

 

[stuckneworleans]

Because it shows how weak of a person you are that you feel better about yourself posting these videos. And it's funny that you call it a universal truth because there's many black prodigies/geniuses that have IQs many deviations east of yours. Anyway, I'm blocking you because it's not worth arguing with you anymore. I have no hate against you; I know your racism is a product of your environment, and that it's not your fault you have such views. I hope you learn for the better, because I know some people have.

 

[Slayerino]

Because it shows how weak of a person you are that you feel better about yourself posting these videos. And it's funny that you call it a universal truth because there's many black prodigies/geniuses that have IQs many deviations east of yours. Anyway, I'm blocking you because it's not worth arguing with you anymore. I have no hate against you; I know your racism is a product of your environment, and that it's not your fault you have such views. I hope you learn for the better, because I know some people have.

You must have graduated in gender studies. Ever heard of the bell curve? Of course there are negro prodigies, I never said the opposite. You see? You're full of prejudice and suppositions, but it's fine, I know you're butthurt by a random anon forcing you to confront the harsh truth of racial inequality. It's fine, you can ignore me, enjoy your safe space.

 

[PersianKingdom]

View attachment 253519

This is the most fallacious argument I've seen on this forum regardless of what you're trying to get at.

 

[Slayerino]

This is the most fallacious argument I've seen on this forum regardless of what you're trying to get at.

Man, it's useless to reason with you. I'm motivated neither by hatred nor by pettiness. I have no problem in stating that there are negroes smarter than me, with a higher IQ than me. The point is all about the averages. The distribution point of the curve determines the hierarchy of the various races on earth.

 

[Alexanderr]

Imagine giving a shit
Over for you, OP

 

[Slayerino]

Imagine giving a shit
Over for you, OP

Thanks for the bumperino, here's a golderino kind strangerino.

 

[PersianKingdom]

Man, it's useless to reason with you. I'm motivated neither by hatred nor by pettiness. I have no problem in stating that there are negroes smarter than me, with a higher IQ than me. The point is all about the averages. The distribution point of the curve determines the hierarchy of the various races on earth.

You don't seem to get the point. Would it matter if I was to, for example, take a population to an isolated environment for their whole lives without any resources and then get them to take an IQ test and conclude that such people have low IQ? No, it would lack any significance, of course they're going to have a lower IQ. When Scientific journals have shown that there is no significant IQ differences between Blacks and other races when environments are held constant it becomes fruitless to keeping saying blacks have a lower IQ. No one cares if you think, or if it is true, that blacks have lower IQ on average. When environment is held constant there is no difference. You must also note that the difference in genetics between two random people within a race is on average greater than the difference of the average genetic makeup of one race compared to another, including blacks. Now, you can either just keep giving worthless studies that have no significance to the major point of what your racism is trying to signify, or you'll try and get studies which aren't widely proven (not because it hurts feelings, but because of the lack of Scientific rigor). It's funny to realize you're on a different league of intelligence talking with people that are double your age when you haven't even graduated high school.

 

[Deleted member 685]

View attachment 253519

Brutal but based

 

[Gazzamogga]

racism = truecel trait

 

[Slayerino]

Now, you can either just keep giving worthless studies that have no significance to the major point of what your racism is trying to signify, or you'll try and get studies which aren't widely proven

yes, worthless because they're not aligned with your opinions. Your argumentations are a mix of cherrypicking and logical fallacies altogether. Yes, I'm racist, it's a natural and strategical evolutional trait possessed by the large majority of mammals on this planet. You know "who" is not racist? The rocks. You might have a lot in common with them.

 

[PersianKingdom]

yes, worthless because they're not aligned with your opinions. Your argumentations are a mix of cherrypicking and logical fallacies altogether. Yes, I'm racist, it's a natural and strategical evolutional trait possessed by the large majority of mammals on this planet. You know "who" is not racist? The rocks. You might have a lot in common with them.

No, I'm asking you for some Scientific journals that meet a Scientific criteria that proves what your racism is trying to signify. It's simple man. Prove to me that it's predominantly hereditary. You must have them lined up if you have your thoughts so ingrained right?

 

[Averagecel]

 

[PersianKingdom]

yes, worthless because they're not aligned with your opinions. Your argumentations are a mix of cherrypicking and logical fallacies altogether. Yes, I'm racist, it's a natural and strategical evolutional trait possessed by the large majority of mammals on this planet. You know "who" is not racist? The rocks. You might have a lot in common with them.

Do you also realize how dumb your last point makes you out to be. I mean I'm not going to even get too much into it, but I'm just going to tell you since you really like to talk about IQ that there is a negative correlation between racism and IQ.

 

[Slayerino]

No, I'm asking you for some Scientific journals that meet a Scientific criteria that proves what your racism is trying to signify. It's simple man. Prove to me that it's predominantly hereditary. You must have them lined up if you have your thoughts so ingrained right?

There are so many, any way start by reading this

Then, if you haven't rejected already everything, you can read this

Or go directly to the FBI site and search for the annual report of crime statistics. You'll see a very "raycisss" pattern in those reports.

 

[Patriot]

Nice
Racism =/= Race Realism

 

[Averagecel]

Brutal but based

 

[Alexanderr]

Thanks for the bumperino, here's a golderino kind strangerino.

shit thread

 

[Justttt]

not a single word

 

[Deleted member 4804]

not a single word

Same

 

[PersianKingdom]

There are so many, any way start by reading this
View attachment 253575
Then, if you haven't rejected already everything, you can read this
View attachment 253578
Or go directly to the FBI site a search for the annual report of crime statistics. You'll see a very "raycisss" pattern in those report.

I'm asking for Scientific journals. You know I can't get these and so see the validity of them so there is no point in that. I'm also not arguing against FBI reports, because I'm sure there is a disproportionate number of black crime. I want to see reputable Scientific works in reputable Scientific journals on the IQ differences between blacks and other races when environment is held constant. I want to know if black truly are inferior as you say when given the same opportunities. This isn't whether or not blacks commit a disproportional amount of crime, whether or not they have a lower average IQ; I want to see your race superiority proven. I want to know if blacks are inferior if given the same opportunity. Give me that. I'll gladly give it up if it's proven.

I'll be back tomorrow to argue further.

 

[PenileFacialSurgery]

IQ doesn't matter, only looks do

Low IQ statement.

 

[didntreadlol]

Low IQ statement.

chad doesnt even know what IQ means

 

[hebbewem]

dn rd

 

[Slayerino]

I'm asking for Scientific journals. You know I can't get these and so see the validity of them so there is no point in that. I'm also not arguing against FBI reports, because I'm sure there is a disproportionate number of black crime. I want to see reputable Scientific works in reputable Scientific journals on the IQ differences between blacks and other races when environment is held constant. I want to know if black truly are inferior as you say when given the same opportunities. This isn't whether or not blacks commit a disproportional amount of crime, whether or not they have a lower average IQ; I want to see your race superiority proven. I want to know if blacks are inferior if given the same opportunity. Give me that. I'll gladly give it up if it's proven.

I'll be back tomorrow to argue further.

James Watson is one of the most important living figures in American science. The claim in his new book Avoid Boring People, that basic evolutionary logic predicts we should expect intelligence differences between racial groups is, if anything, an uncomplicated truth. Watson's claim in his recent interview with Charlotte Hunt-Grubbe that intelligence testing shows lower scores in Africa than Europe is likewise, entirely supported by the scientific literature. As is Dr. Watson's statement that there are many talented people of African descent, which clarifies he is speaking of different average scores, not that said populations are homogenous.

Below I am adding 65 psychometric intelligence study citations for sub-Saharan Africa, collected in IQ & Global Inequality, Race Differences in Intelligence, and IQ & the Wealth of Nations. The citations cover 47% of SS African countries or 78% of the people by national population numbers. The studies vary in quality, sample size, and representativeness, but broadly agree in their findings. Representative studies of the school age population with large sample sizes do not exhibit higher scores, much less scores that approach anything like European norms.


******************


Sub-Saharan Africa
Countries: 43
W/ data: 20 (47% coun/78% pop)
Studies: 65
IQ: 68

West Africa
Countries: 20
W/ Data: 6 (30% coun/65% pop)
Studies: 15
IQ: 67

Central Africa
Countries: 5
W/ Data: 3 (60% coun/80% pop)
Studies: 9
IQ: 64

East Africa
Countries: 8
W/ Data: 5 (63% coun/93% pop)
Studies: 16
IQ: 72

Southern Africa
Countries: 10
W/ Data: 6 (60% coun/76% pop)
Studies: 25
IQ: 69


******************


The recent August issue of the European Journal of Personality features a paper titled The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations by German psychologist Heiner Rindermann. This paper includes an open peer commentary by 31 international scholars, as well as a response by Rindermann. The target paper provides valuable new IQ data from sub-Saharan African, or rather let's us know we have an overlooked source of intelligence data. I am adding these papers to the gnxpforum files section for you to access.

Starting in the 1960s and picking up pace in the early 1990s various well-implemented student assessment tests have been conducted for the purposes of international educational comparisons, including the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), the International Educational Achievement (IEA) measures, and the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The cross-cultural test construction, sampling techniques, and quality control for these tests are exemplary. These international tests have also included half a dozen sub-Saharan African countries, and the test construction and sampling techniques are likewise very good. For example Ghana, Botswana, and South Africa were included in TIMSS 2003. For each tested grade level, at least 5000 random students from 150 schools were tested in these countries.

Gene Expression bloggers recognized the strong correlation between these types of tests and IQ as far back as 2004, but recently this has reached the academic literature. Last year Richard Lynn and Jaan Mikk reported correlations of .92-1.00 between IQ and TIMSS 2003 for math and science.

In his paper, Heiner Rindermann takes this sort of analysis to the next level by collecting data from all 20 total international student assessment tests encompassing some 78 countries and comparing them with measured IQ data from 128 countries. Rindermann finds, first of all that the combined national student results correlate perfectly with the combined national IQ data (.98), demonstrating the assessment scores and the IQ scores are the same measured construct. With all these diverse kinds of tests for each nation, Rindermann examines the data together through factor analysis and finds that the g factor of intelligence explains some 95% of the variance in the test results: "Thus, cognitive ability differences across nations are by and large unidimensional". (p 681) The stable differences between nations in all cognitive type tests are explained by the g factor.

Furthermore Rindermann emphasizes that, consistent with previous IQ testing, the g loaded international assessment tests reveal sub-Saharan African IQ scores that characteristically range from 1.5-2.5+ standard deviations below European and East Asian norms:

... I do not believe that the [sub-Saharan testing] scores at the general level are largely incorrect: The low values correspond to too many other variables and aspects standing for low cognitive abilities like results of student assessment and Piaget studies (e.g. Botswana in IEA-Reading 14 year-old pupils 1991 330, as IQ 75; South-Africa in TIMSS 8th graders 1999 259, as IQ 64; Ghana in TIMSS 8th graders 2003 266, as IQ 65; South-Africa in TIMSS 8th graders 2003 254, as IQ 63; plausibility considerations lead to lower results for the youth of Africa because of low school attendance rates and unrepresentative participation of countries), poor quality school systems, high skipping rates, low rates of high school degrees, low patent application rates, no famous universities, and many reports of everyday behaviour from officials, traders, journalists, ethnologists and other scientists in 19th century to this day... (p 770)

Thus typical African IQ scores of 70 and below can still be taken as a reliable finding. It is not simply the manufactured data of racialist researchers, or a byproduct of inadequate testing procedures. And, more importantly from the standpoint of the Watson controversy, certainly no reliable body of evidence has shown anything like parity with typical European scores.

I'd like to reiterate, then, that IQs below 70 do not by themselves signify mental retardation, as it is commonly understood as a pathological state.

There are two types of retardation: familial and organic. The former is caused by normal population variation in intelligence while the latter is caused by diverse individual problems such as genetic defects or head injuries. Related to this, the IQ scores of people with familial retardation correlate normally with their parent and sibling's IQ scores (.50), while the IQ scores of people with organic retardation are not much associated with the IQs in their family.

Retardation is measured by a combination of IQ and adaptive scales. Sometimes an IQ of 70 is used as the threshold of retardation. People with familial retardation and organic retardation of matched IQ perform the same in academic and training contexts, but organically retarded individuals do worse on the adaptive scales which measure things such as self-care, motor skills, and social functioning, signifying a broader range of mental dysfunction and some sort of developmental damage.

In the US, consistent with the normal bell curve, there are proportionately about five times as many blacks (16%) with an IQ of 70 or below than there are whites (3%). But basically the same proportional number of whites and blacks are organically retarded (whites 1.5%, blacks 2.0%). (The g Factor, p 369)

The African scores indicate that there are proportionately about seventeen times as many sub-Saharan Africans with IQs below 70 (50%) than American whites (3%), and possibly even more. While organic retardation is probably somewhat higher among Africans, due to overall more challenging health conditions, this should in no way be regarded as characteristic of their normal intelligence variation.

There is nothing particularly meaningful or necessary about an IQ of 70 as a threshold for 'retardation'. La Griffe Du Lion writes:

In 1959, [the American Association on Mental Deficiency] set the IQ threshold for mental retardation at 85. The civil rights movement of the next decade forced psychologists to rethink this boundary, because half the African American population fell below it. In 1973, responding to this concern, AAMD (by then AAMR) changed the threshold for retardation from IQ 85 to IQ 70. The boundary moved south by one standard deviation! The proportion of blacks below the threshold instantly dropped from about 50 percent to 12 percent.

In other words 50% of modern Africans are no more 'mentally retarded' than 50% of African-Americans were 'mentally retarded' in the 1960s. These are labels of convenience designed for normal within-population variation. But the real world academic and economic consequences of IQs of 70-85 and below are the same no matter what you label them.

 

[PenileFacialSurgery]

chad doesnt even know what IQ means

You underestimate Chads IQ.

 

[Deleted member 2769]

high iq for arguing about the obvious

 

[Deleted member 1546]

I wish I wasn’t a 130 IQ curry

 

[rockndogs]

Same thing everytime. Someone creates a thread "niggers have the lowest IQ among races".

Niggers on the thread: "IQ DOESNT MATTER YOU RACIST FAGGOT"

every

single

thread

just accept the fact idiots.

 

[Slayerino]

I'll be back tomorrow to argue further.

Aaaannnddd he's banned! Probably he requested it himself. Another leftist btfo with simple data and facts.

 

[Kingkellz]

@Mewcel