Proof we live in a simulation, and that simulation is managed by an Incel

[OldRooster]

The two Countries with the highest birth rates are Nigger and Chad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_fertility_rate

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I know this is a joke but it’s a self defeating argument to anybody who is retarded and thinks “we live in a simulation”

To say we live in one is to imply you have knowledge that would 100% verify this to be the case and that to do so would suggest you can compare it to a NON simulation world which you cannot hence why it fails

And finally if you figure out your in a simulation then how isn’t that part of the simulations plan to make you figure out your in a simulation

Basically you can’t prove it and it removes the possibility for knowledge as a whole and makes any arguments for it moot.

 

[Doommaxxed]

I know this is a joke but it’s a self defeating argument to anybody who is retarded and thinks “we live in a simulation”

To say we live in one is to imply you have knowledge that would 100% verify this to be the case and that to do so would suggest you can compare it to a NON simulation world which you cannot hence why it fails

And finally if you figure out your in a simulation then how isn’t that part of the simulations plan to make you figure out your in a simulation

Basically you can’t prove it and it removes the possibility for knowledge as a whole and makes any arguments for it moot.

It doesn’t matter if we’re in a simulation or not; wether we’re here because were self aware data or made by some God doesn’t change how we perceive or be able to distinguish how this feels “real” or “false”.

 

[Brus Wane]

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

I know this is a joke but it’s a self defeating argument to anybody who is retarded and thinks “we live in a simulation”

To say we live in one is to imply you have knowledge that would 100% verify this to be the case and that to do so would suggest you can compare it to a NON simulation world which you cannot hence why it fails

And finally if you figure out your in a simulation then how isn’t that part of the simulations plan to make you figure out your in a simulation

Basically you can’t prove it and it removes the possibility for knowledge as a whole and makes any arguments for it moot.

I have the source codes pussy

I do know.

 

[Meteor21]

I know this is a joke but it’s a self defeating argument to anybody who is retarded and thinks “we live in a simulation”

To say we live in one is to imply you have knowledge that would 100% verify this to be the case and that to do so would suggest you can compare it to a NON simulation world which you cannot hence why it fails

And finally if you figure out your in a simulation then how isn’t that part of the simulations plan to make you figure out your in a simulation

Basically you can’t prove it and it removes the possibility for knowledge as a whole and makes any arguments for it moot.

It fails for other reasons:

1. I think, therefore I am.

2. If there's a programmer there's still a universe.

3. Why is it a programmer rather than God?

 

[aryan mogger]

jfl its probably a chud looking nerd

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

It doesn’t matter if we’re in a simulation or not; wether we’re here because were self aware data or made by some God doesn’t change how we perceive or be able to distinguish how this feels “real” or “false”.

Makes a big difference because if your worldview can be summarised used as “we just exist” then you can’t even trust your own experiences how do you know or how can you make an account that “reality” is true because if it’s “we are just here” then what if everything we see touch and feel are mental phantasms? Your worldview has no way of verifying truth claims and knowledge is the point. My worldview has an answer to this but yours takes the illogical middle ground whereby you cannot critique any opposing worldview due to it.

I have the source codes pussy

I do know.

Please do send so I can program myself to have 1octrillion dollars in my bank

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

It fails for other reasons:

1. I think, therefore I am.

2. If there's a programmer there's still a universe.

3. Why is it a programmer rather than God?

Yes and no. Sure you can say this and whisky it can work an intelligent atheist will just say “Why can’t we just be because we just are and it’s all just an random mishmash of entropy what in all this indicates that there must be an intelligent being who is the origin for all of this why can it not be due to entropic ordinance

But in regards to the simulation thing, then yes and then the question goes “Who made the person who made the simulation”

 

[Meteor21]

Yes and no. Sure you can say this and whisky it can work an intelligent atheist will just say “Why can’t we just be because we just are and it’s all just an random mishmash of entropy what in all this indicates that there must be an intelligent being who is the origin for all of this why can it not be due to entropic ordinance

But in regards to the simulation thing, then yes and then the question goes “Who made the person who made the simulation”

Most atheists are obsessed with science. The universe just existing uncaused is contrary to our understanding of science