PSA: Being average is bad

[RedPilledStemcel]

Just because you were rated average doesn't mean you can get the average girl. You're sexually invisible until you are top 20% of the online dating population (probably top 5% of actual population), so like a 6 psl.

 

[Deleted member 470]

online yeah, irl not quite

 

[Tony]

online yeah, irl not quite

is that ur dog

 

[Deleted member 39]

I'll always have confidence issues no matter how many girls want me after I'm looksmaxxed because I wasn't born as the tallest, blackest biggest guy with the largest dick.

 

[Deleted member 470]

is that ur dog

yes but he died summer last year

 

[Tony]

yes but he died summer last year

i miss him
he is a cute one

 

[Deleted member 470]

i miss him
he is a cute one

yes he was a very good boy

died very young too, his mother died just a couple of months ago of old age

 

[Tony]

yes he was a very good boy

died very young too, his mother died just a couple of months ago of old age

do you have another dog

 

[RedPilledStemcel]

This isn't a private chat

 

[Deleted member 470]

do you have another dog

no but the owner of his mom (my uncle) got a new one

it's also very cute

 

[androidcel]

Unless you run status game or money game

 

[Deleted member 470]

This isn't a private chat

can u not see that we are grieving

 

[Tony]

no but the owner of his mom (my uncle) got a new one

it's also very cute

dont u want another dog

This isn't a private chat

 

[RedPilledStemcel]

Unless you run status game or money game

Money game for hookups=prostitution pretty much. Just escorts at that point. Less work, possibly cheaper, more responsive.

 

[Deleted member 470]

dont u want another dog

I do but I live in an apartment now since I moved to another town for uni and idk if I have the time to take care of it properly

 

[HorseFace]

Unless you run status game or money game

Also if your outgoing and likable it raises your smv

 

[Sc22]

Average looks is so bad.

 

[VST]

online yeah, irl not quite

Online is all that matters these days though.
Women don't really go out IRL to get dick when they can get much better dick online.

Same reason why so many stores are closing down.

 

[Deleted member 281]

Average men only obtain the scraps.

 

[HorseFace]

Online is all that matters these days though.
Women don't really go out IRL to get dick when they can get much better dick online.

Same reason why so many stores are closing down.

They'll still be out in the public tho

 

[VST]

They'll still be out in the public tho

Yeah, to get food/do basic bitch stuff.
Definitely not to: find a bf or hook up with someone.

 

[HorseFace]

Yeah, to get food/do basic bitch stuff.
Definitely not to: find a bf or hook up with someone.

No but you could still approch them or get to know them?

 

[Final82]

Online is all that matters these days though.
Women don't really go out IRL to get dick when they can get much better dick online.

Same reason why so many stores are closing down.

Real life only works in younger age group - less than 20 years age . Online is growing exponentially because it’s so so easy for women

They'll still be out in the public tho

Yes but why would she give you a chance in public when she can get a chad or chsdlire online? Public approaching works for same guys who are slayers online ( 8/10 up )

 

[StudyHacks]

They'll still be out in the public tho

But they're most likely taken by a Chad, and unless you are a Chad, you're sexually completely invisible to them. Average guy in a man's opinion = below average ugly loser faggot in a woman's opinion --> invisible, thus zero pussy

Harsh truth. Fuck women.

 

[Final82]

But they're most likely taken by a Chad, and unless you are a Chad, you're sexually completely invisible to them. Average guy in a man's opinion = below average ugly loser faggot in a woman's opinion --> invisible, thus zero pussy

Harsh truth. Fuck women.

The way we look at 300 pound landwhale is exactly how women look at sub8 men .

 

[StudyHacks]

The way we look at 300 pound landwhale is exactly how women look at sub8 men .

Hit the nail on the head. Have women always been like this tho? I mean, even when the societal repercussions held women back from exercising their hypergamy, did they look at men the way they're looking at them nowadays? As far as I know, after all, the 80/20 rule has biological roots, so it's not a psychological phenomenon but a biologically hardwired trait / perception of the world in their own eyes.

 

[Final82]

Hit the nail on the head. Have women always been like this tho? I mean, even when the societal repercussions held women back from exercising their hypergamy, did they look at men the way they're looking at them nowadays? As far as I know, after all, the 80/20 rule has biological roots, so it's not a psychological phenomenon but a biologically hardwired trait / perception of the world in their own eyes.

Excellent point . The answer is yes and no , both. Yes, biologically as primates , women are wired to seek the top mate for reproduction to ensure that good genetics and resources are provided to her offsprings. In forest , 10,000 years ago - good genetics and resources often meant the same thing- the tallest , chiseled look , muscular , lean guy with high T face features was almost always the leader of the pack due to his strength , agility and good genetics . Thus , he can provide best resources which back then were basic food by hunting and protecting from other enemies . Both of these depended on male”s physical ability - hunter features - facial and body - lean non fat muscular athletic strong frame . And human race has spent thousands of years in forest - civilization and marriage is very new concept from evolutionary standpoint. Therefore , the primitive uninhibited human female will always go for the type of guy I described above - aka chad or tyrone in current open dating market. Makes sense , right ?


However , as humans evolved , a large proportion of males who were not physically the strongest , were intellectually superior . They designed and deviced the society and imposed social conditioning and rules to check “ hypergamy .” Also , upto 1950 even , in most western cultures , women were married by 20 years at the most . The mate selection was primarily done by her family - the provider status of a man was more important , so was the reliability , and socially such man “ a beta provider “ was ranked the highest in marriage market . Note that back then there was no “ open dating market”. Because women were conditioned and almost always were virgins at the time of marriage , the only sexual experience she had - was with her beta provider husband who carried high social respect due to his job, education , and provider / relatable status . Such men were of high value and thus women looked at them with high value - she didn’t know how a feral lustful sex with a chad is - on most part . Looks were not that important for male sexual market value or marriage value . She also could pair bond well , since she was a virgin . Yes , even then women cheated and had lust for chads but it was tightly regulated by social rules and norms . “ lady “ behavior etc .

Come modern feminism and we are back in forest - this is the worst forest ever as a man . We have laws and social support to women provided by government. So women don’t need that “ provider “ role ( intellectual based provider role to provide money by working a job - as she can work herself now or government helps her ) . Plus her sexuality is free and she is free to choose . Within no time , social construct is broken and she is going to her primitive routes where mans physical body is the most improtant asset of his sexual value . Face for genetics and body / frame for the primitive provider / protector role which is not relevant in modern society but she will always pick such as Guy because that’s in her DNA . Plus moment a girl sleeps with a chad or a Tyrone it’s over . She can’t pair bond with even a chad lite . As her cock count goes up rapidly , she loses the ability to respect men and pair bond . She knows that she is the chooser and men are disposable . Clearly , she views at sub 8 men as disgusting , creepy , ugly , inferior creatures who should just go away and wants the chad Prince Charming to swipe her feet .

 

[Deleted member 616]

 

[Deleted member 443]

Excellent point . The answer is yes and no , both. Yes, biologically as primates , women are wired to seek the top mate for reproduction to ensure that good genetics and resources are provided to her offsprings. In forest , 10,000 years ago - good genetics and resources often meant the same thing- the tallest , chiseled look , muscular , lean guy with high T face features was almost always the leader of the pack due to his strength , agility and good genetics . Thus , he can provide best resources which back then were basic food by hunting and protecting from other enemies . Both of these depended on male”s physical ability - hunter features - facial and body - lean non fat muscular athletic strong frame . And human race has spent thousands of years in forest - civilization and marriage is very new concept from evolutionary standpoint. Therefore , the primitive uninhibited human female will always go for the type of guy I described above - aka chad or tyrone in current open dating market. Makes sense , right ?


However , as humans evolved , a large proportion of males who were not physically the strongest , were intellectually superior . They designed and deviced the society and imposed social conditioning and rules to check “ hypergamy .” Also , upto 1950 even , in most western cultures , women were married by 20 years at the most . The mate selection was primarily done by her family - the provider status of a man was more important , so was the reliability , and socially such man “ a beta provider “ was ranked the highest in marriage market . Note that back then there was no “ open dating market”. Because women were conditioned and almost always were virgins at the time of marriage , the only sexual experience she had - was with her beta provider husband who carried high social respect due to his job, education , and provider / relatable status . Such men were of high value and thus women looked at them with high value - she didn’t know how a feral lustful sex with a chad is - on most part . Looks were not that important for male sexual market value or marriage value . She also could pair bond well , since she was a virgin . Yes , even then women cheated and had lust for chads but it was tightly regulated by social rules and norms . “ lady “ behavior etc .

Come modern feminism and we are back in forest - this is the worst forest ever as a man . We have laws and social support to women provided by government. So women don’t need that “ provider “ role ( intellectual based provider role to provide money by working a job - as she can work herself now or government helps her ) . Plus her sexuality is free and she is free to choose . Within no time , social construct is broken and she is going to her primitive routes where mans physical body is the most improtant asset of his sexual value . Face for genetics and body / frame for the primitive provider / protector role which is not relevant in modern society but she will always pick such as Guy because that’s in her DNA . Plus moment a girl sleeps with a chad or a Tyrone it’s over . She can’t pair bond with even a chad lite . As her cock count goes up rapidly , she loses the ability to respect men and pair bond . She knows that she is the chooser and men are disposable . Clearly , she views at sub 8 men as disgusting , creepy , ugly , inferior creatures who should just go away and wants the chad Prince Charming to swipe her feet .

 

[AntiSocial-Fakecel]

I'll always have confidence issues no matter how many girls want me after I'm looksmaxxed because I wasn't born as the tallest, blackest biggest guy with the largest dick.

Are you white?

 

[Deleted member 39]

Are you white?

Yes

 

[FatmanO]

Just because you were rated average doesn't mean you can get the average girl. You're sexually invisible until you are top 20% of the online dating population (probably top 5% of actual population), so like a 6 psl.

In online yes, in real life no. You can be average and do good. On online.... well shiet

Excellent point . The answer is yes and no , both. Yes, biologically as primates , women are wired to seek the top mate for reproduction to ensure that good genetics and resources are provided to her offsprings. In forest , 10,000 years ago - good genetics and resources often meant the same thing- the tallest , chiseled look , muscular , lean guy with high T face features was almost always the leader of the pack due to his strength , agility and good genetics . Thus , he can provide best resources which back then were basic food by hunting and protecting from other enemies . Both of these depended on male”s physical ability - hunter features - facial and body - lean non fat muscular athletic strong frame . And human race has spent thousands of years in forest - civilization and marriage is very new concept from evolutionary standpoint. Therefore , the primitive uninhibited human female will always go for the type of guy I described above - aka chad or tyrone in current open dating market. Makes sense , right ?


However , as humans evolved , a large proportion of males who were not physically the strongest , were intellectually superior . They designed and deviced the society and imposed social conditioning and rules to check “ hypergamy .” Also , upto 1950 even , in most western cultures , women were married by 20 years at the most . The mate selection was primarily done by her family - the provider status of a man was more important , so was the reliability , and socially such man “ a beta provider “ was ranked the highest in marriage market . Note that back then there was no “ open dating market”. Because women were conditioned and almost always were virgins at the time of marriage , the only sexual experience she had - was with her beta provider husband who carried high social respect due to his job, education , and provider / relatable status . Such men were of high value and thus women looked at them with high value - she didn’t know how a feral lustful sex with a chad is - on most part . Looks were not that important for male sexual market value or marriage value . She also could pair bond well , since she was a virgin . Yes , even then women cheated and had lust for chads but it was tightly regulated by social rules and norms . “ lady “ behavior etc .

Come modern feminism and we are back in forest - this is the worst forest ever as a man . We have laws and social support to women provided by government. So women don’t need that “ provider “ role ( intellectual based provider role to provide money by working a job - as she can work herself now or government helps her ) . Plus her sexuality is free and she is free to choose . Within no time , social construct is broken and she is going to her primitive routes where mans physical body is the most improtant asset of his sexual value . Face for genetics and body / frame for the primitive provider / protector role which is not relevant in modern society but she will always pick such as Guy because that’s in her DNA . Plus moment a girl sleeps with a chad or a Tyrone it’s over . She can’t pair bond with even a chad lite . As her cock count goes up rapidly , she loses the ability to respect men and pair bond . She knows that she is the chooser and men are disposable . Clearly , she views at sub 8 men as disgusting , creepy , ugly , inferior creatures who should just go away and wants the chad Prince Charming to swipe her feet .

Sub 8 men arent disgusting

 

[spark]

Yes

you are insecure for not being born the blackest?

 

[Deleted member 470]

you are insecure for not being born the blackest?

hmmmm

 

[Deleted member 39]

you are insecure for not being born the blackest?

Blacks have higher SMV than whites

 

[spark]

Blacks have higher SMV than whites

no