WrathOfOlives
Bronze
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
- Posts
- 358
- Reputation
- 1,534
If you look at content made by any PUA influencer, they all unanimously use better looking women than them in videos / thumbnails as props for social proof, it's like a desperate attempt to communicate "see! look! I have sex, I promise!".
But they only choose women ABOVE their looks level, not 3s or 4s. like they are.
So clearly these guys really care about looks. So why is it a bridge too far for these guys to accept women also really care about looks? If they would admit they are shallow and their audience are shallow, why would women seemingly be immune from being shallow also?
This is the one thing I never got with these guys.
Like, the whole point of preferring to date/sleep with good looking people is to have higher quality genes for your offspring - this is a baseline trait for all mammals, let alone humans.
In their mind, most women unlike men are just mysteriously indifferent to selecting higher quality genes for their offspring and are cool with pudgy balding guys with no bones.
Or they believe being confident or funny overcomes this desire for healthy offspring. Yet, if a looksmatched 3/10 women came up to them in whatever Brazilian favela they source these women to date, they would snub her 100%, no matter how "confident" or "funny" she was.
Oh, but women are different like that, unlike men, they're angels and are indifferent to looks.
Doesn't that just sound like bullshit?
But they only choose women ABOVE their looks level, not 3s or 4s. like they are.
So clearly these guys really care about looks. So why is it a bridge too far for these guys to accept women also really care about looks? If they would admit they are shallow and their audience are shallow, why would women seemingly be immune from being shallow also?
This is the one thing I never got with these guys.
Like, the whole point of preferring to date/sleep with good looking people is to have higher quality genes for your offspring - this is a baseline trait for all mammals, let alone humans.
In their mind, most women unlike men are just mysteriously indifferent to selecting higher quality genes for their offspring and are cool with pudgy balding guys with no bones.
Or they believe being confident or funny overcomes this desire for healthy offspring. Yet, if a looksmatched 3/10 women came up to them in whatever Brazilian favela they source these women to date, they would snub her 100%, no matter how "confident" or "funny" she was.
Oh, but women are different like that, unlike men, they're angels and are indifferent to looks.
Doesn't that just sound like bullshit?