Qoves Now Claims That Ideal Eye Spacing is “10% Beyond Normal” (New Ratio Just Dropped?)

D

Deleted member 26678

Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Posts
475
Reputation
634


im not exactly sure what he means by “10% spaced beyond normal” but maybe he meant 10% beyond the typically thought of ideal of 1 eye width apart eye spacing?
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 21403, Kebab Master, thecel and 1 other person
he means 1 eye width + 10% of one eye.

so 1.1 eye.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, SteveRogers, Kebab Master and 4 others
This is for women
 
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: User49 and thecel
legit if it’s actually pfl to icd

not whatever creatingattrwctive does
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
.46 esr minimum to look good
.48-.5 ideal
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Blackgymmax, t50prince, SteveRogers and 2 others
Ideal
230102104629-goat-banned-words.jpg

Hunter :feelshehe:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zeyn, LowTrust, thecel and 4 others
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Magnum Opus
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, User49 and sub5inchcel
Water and shree crooks pill.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BongMog
caged hard

fucking retarded dog
.5 was a bit excessive tbh you need sort of a longer midface like gandy to not look deformed
.48 is perfect
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
.46 esr minimum to look good
.48-.5 ideal
i would say .5 is a bit too much. my esr is 0.49 and it would look better if i had a bit lower ratio (better zygos)
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 26678
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, looksforlife, Deleted member 8758 and 1 other person
that’s 0.42 son

gets lower/higher depending on bodyfat
1602519_1578620770599.png


desktop-wallpaper-jordan-barrett.jpg

looked so much better with whatever esr this was
estimating .47-.48 probably
 
0.45 and 0.47 second one

ur dumb nigga
i was talking about the 2nd pic's esr being better & i measured it at .48 (looksrate is unreliable)
stfu incel
 
  • JFL
Reactions: User49
  • JFL
Reactions: cancercell
Dndr but all I saw was polina avi so I clicked
94F05956 C789 407E B50E 11FF90068C5B
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: abyssfeelsvoid and thecel
what does creating attractive do
i can’t tell where his eyes end

he isn’t just measuring from medial to lateral canthus, which is where i assume this ratio comes from that qoves got. might be wrong tho and his shit works

anyway es ratio + icd to pfl isn’t full picture at all many factors affect perceived ipd.
 


im not exactly sure what he means by “10% spaced beyond normal” but maybe he meant 10% beyond the typically thought of ideal of 1 eye width apart eye spacing?

thats obvious, everyone who ever measured a face knows that 1 eye of space is not ideal.
1681230310442
also this measurement is stupid. Marko jaric has 1 eye between. It means nothing compared to es ratio.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel
My mental instability is 10% beyond normal
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
thats obvious, everyone who ever measured a face knows that 1 eye of space is not ideal. View attachment 2147262 also this measurement is stupid. Marko jaric has 1 eye between. It means nothing compared to es ratio.
1 eye spacing is ideal COMBINED with good IPD to bizygo (aka ES ratio)
 
1-s2.0-S0042698909005045-gr2b.jpg


Not over if you're a bit under 0.46
 
Lol at the second to last slide telling you to get an OBO.
 
over for channing tatum and Depp
Depp has a good esr like .46 or sum

Channing Tatum would look better with a higher esr. He's been clowned on for having close set eyes even by normies
 
Depp has a good esr like .46 or sum

Channing Tatum would look better with a higher esr. He's been clowned on for having close set eyes even by normies
No dude Depp has a really bad ESR. it's 0.43 I have autistically measured a bunch of ESRs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SubhumanityForce
No that tool over-estimates ESRs I tried it on mine and it said 0.46 but I have 0.44.

If you want exact measurements take screenshots and click and drag your mouse over the screenshot and you can take measurements. Much more accurate. He has 0.438 on that one. On other less frauded pics he has 0.42-0.43
 
No that tool over-estimates ESRs I tried it on mine and it said 0.46 but I have 0.44.

If you want exact measurements take screenshots and drag your mouse over the pic and you can take measurements. Much more accurate.
i dragged the lines myself, it's easier than going into photoshop and measuring the pixels. it overestimated that pic at first then i adjusted it, you can look at the lines and see they're in the right positions

it's accurate, he's prob .45-.46 depending on pics which isn't bad at all. i take back what i said earlier, .47-.48 is the most pleasing to look at, and the closer you are to that measurement the better
 
i dragged the lines myself, it's easier than going into photoshop and measuring the pixels. it overestimated that pic at first then i adjusted it, you can look at the lines and see they're in the right positions

it's accurate, he's prob .45-.46 depending on pics which isn't bad at all. i take back what i said earlier, .47-.48 is the most pleasing to look at, and the closer you are to that measurement the better
It's easier but less accurate. In the below pic Barrett has ~0.43 ESR (121/282). Measuring his temples since they are larger than his bizygo (you should go to largest point in the face)

Johnny depp has ~0.435 in your example pic.

I think your perception of ESR is skewed and you are under-estimating what a legit 0.46 ESR looks like. It looks perfect.

342190136 616301857074508 3667984316962155550 n
344055495 1931373270545266 2989775607211266626 n





For Depp (350/807) = 0.433
342219667 930704961387329 4084337648828752384 n


342195443 612272464160584 2458249776776221382 n



I might be off by a tiny magnitude but for sure neither of these guys have >0.44 ESRs on these pics.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: cancercell
It's easier but less accurate. In the below pic Barrett has ~0.43 ESR (121/282). Measuring his temples since they are larger than his bizygo (you should go to largest point in the face)

Johnny depp has ~0.435 in your example pic.

I think your perception of ESR is skewed and you are under-estimating what a legit 0.46 ESR looks like. It looks perfect.

View attachment 2180460View attachment 2180461




For Depp (350/807) = 0.433
View attachment 2180466

View attachment 2180467


I might be off by a tiny magnitude but for sure neither of these guys have >0.44 ESRs on these pics.
that's weird yea, i checked it in photoshop and i got a little over .44 though. i'm surprised the lines on that website are that inaccurate even when you position them correctly

71d6effd0c0775df93ce2396cfd48c93.jpg


this one i measured a little over .45 though, and i measured at the outmost part of the zygos since his head is tilted to the side slightly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Octavian_Augustus
that's weird yea, i checked it in photoshop and i got a little over .44 though. i'm surprised the lines on that website are that inaccurate even when you position them correctly

71d6effd0c0775df93ce2396cfd48c93.jpg


this one i measured a little over .45 though, and i measured at the outmost part of the zygos since his head is tilted to the side slightly
He has descended so hard. I calculated 0.40 ESR in the below pic. IDK if he got very fat or if IPD decreases with age but it's over (when you have lived his life though you can be okay with it being over)


Screen Shot 2023 05 02 at 20558 PM
 
Last edited:
He has descended so hard. I calculated 0.40 ESR in the below pic. IDK if he got very fat or if IPD decreases with age but it's over (when you have lived his life though you can be okay with it being over)


View attachment 2180514
ipd increases with age, its just camera lens
 
ipd increases with age, its just camera lens
I know lens distortion in selfies can make your IPD look higher. Can pics also make it look lower than your IRL?
 
Last edited:
It's easier but less accurate. In the below pic Barrett has ~0.43 ESR (121/282). Measuring his temples since they are larger than his bizygo (you should go to largest point in the face)

Johnny depp has ~0.435 in your example pic.

I think your perception of ESR is skewed and you are under-estimating what a legit 0.46 ESR looks like. It looks perfect.

View attachment 2180460View attachment 2180461




For Depp (350/807) = 0.433
View attachment 2180466

View attachment 2180467


I might be off by a tiny magnitude but for sure neither of these guys have >0.44 ESRs on these pics.
How did you measure this
 
  • +1
Reactions: cancercell

Similar threads

JeanneDArcAlter
Discussion Headphones
Replies
14
Views
421
JeanneDArcAlter
JeanneDArcAlter
got.daim
Replies
13
Views
646
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
got.daim
Replies
15
Views
1K
izegream
izegream
got.daim
Replies
43
Views
1K
lurker999
L
got.daim
Replies
30
Views
920
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top