Question to GiantImplants about distraction osteogenesis

D

Deleted member 107083

Zephir
Joined
Nov 16, 2024
Posts
1,991
Reputation
1,915
@RealSurgerymax have you ever thought about doing distraction osteogenesis procedures ?
It has several benefits like :

- gradual adjustments therefore better aesthetic control. Especially important for procedures where aesthetics are harder to envision during procedures like orbital box, midface surgery (lefort 1,2,3), or even cheekbone osteotomies.
- reduced relapse risk
- better healing
- reduced risk of nerve injury
Plus you could use intra-motorized distraction devices with remote control wdy think ?

This would be lifefuel for ppl like @thecel who are scared of getting orbital box because of the associated health and aesthetic risks
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Hankhill2160, Deleted member 83942, Deleted member 71543 and 2 others
idk how it would work with your huge fixation plate shit on the forehead tho
why is it needed ? to stabilize ?
would DO remove the need for this huge metal plate on ur skull ?
@RealSurgerymax
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
@RealSurgerymax have you ever thought about doing distraction osteogenesis procedures ?
It has several benefits like :

- gradual adjustments therefore better aesthetic control.
Worse control than ostetomies. Can only move in one direction and the distraction vector can change unfavorably due to gravity and tissue resistance
Especially important for procedures where aesthetics are harder to envision during procedures like orbital box, midface surgery (lefort 1,2,3), or even cheekbone osteotomies.
- reduced relapse risk
- better healing
- reduced risk of nerve injury
Not really. And you have to do surgery 2x. One to place them and one to remove them. Putting plates and leaving them in is better.
Plus you could use intra-motorized distraction devices with remote control wdy think ?
Yes possible
This would be lifefuel for ppl like @thecel who are scared of getting orbital box because of the associated health and aesthetic risks
Distractors dont stretch bone you still have to do the complete osteotomy so this isn't less risk.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bjornn, Deleted member 71543, ryuken and 3 others
Worse control than ostetomies. Can only move in one direction and the distraction vector can change unfavorably due to gravity and tissue resistance

Not really. And you have to do surgery 2x. One to place them and one to remove them. Putting plates and leaving them in is better.

Yes possible

Distractors dont stretch bone you still have to do the complete osteotomy so this isn't less risk.
brutal shit thanks doctor :feelswhy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543 and ryuken
@thecel time to get orbital box boyo :owo:
i dont its that dangerous tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
66caa9543fcbb407d862764f Copy of ZG430 0187 1024x682

anti gravity chamber distraction osteogenesis is the future btw 🤙
 
Worse control than ostetomies. Can only move in one direction and the distraction vector can change unfavorably due to gravity and tissue resistance

Not really. And you have to do surgery 2x. One to place them and one to remove them. Putting plates and leaving them in is better.

Yes possible

Distractors dont stretch bone you still have to do the complete osteotomy so this isn't less risk.
last question :

the metal plates that come with OBO, are they thick enough to influence other aesthetic parameters ?
I know its placed on the forehead, so would that make the forehead more prominent ?
 
@RealSurgerymax what is your opnion on implants that convert to real bone and can then be removed?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 107083
im so sad im scared of getting botched by niggerimplants LLC
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 83942

Similar threads

menas
Replies
213
Views
29K
heinz_guderian
heinz_guderian
NZb6Air
Replies
86
Views
7K
Giorgio
Giorgio
D
Replies
20
Views
12K
carlos72
carlos72
D
Replies
29
Views
14K
clover
clover

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top