r/IncelTears makes me believe in the dead internet theory

[superpsycho]

Aside from their stupid talking points and the fact that it is literally a hate sub, you can’t tell me that the users posting on there are real people JFL. Every other post is literally the same fucking thing, just reworded. Either that sub is full of middle schoolers who have no more than 15 words in their vocabulary, or it’s just full of bots.

Just lol at reposting an IT post here, you probably got mad at an AI-generated post.

 

[whitepiller]

Eglin airforce base

 

[superpsycho]

Eglin airforce base

 

[registerfasterusing]

Aside from their stupid talking points and the fact that it is literally a hate sub, you can’t tell me that the users posting on there are real people JFL. Every other post is literally the same fucking thing, just reworded. Either that sub is full of middle schoolers who have no more than 15 words in their vocabulary, or it’s just full of bots.

Just lol at reposting an IT post here, you probably got mad at an AI-generated post.

When is ur yt video coming

 

[superpsycho]

When is ur yt video coming

workin on it

 

[whitepiller]

When is ur yt video coming

Fiwst of aww, i'm not a pedophiwe, just to get that out of the way. I am howevew a wibewtawian, and I bewieve that the stawting point fow aww wights shouwd be that of wibewty and fweedom.

When it comes to debating the age of consent, I usuawwy heaw peopwe saying that chiwdwen undew X age awe not capabwe of being abwe to consent. The pwobwem with this wine of awgument is two fowd:

1. Fiwstwy, it diffews fwom cuwtuwe to cuwtuwe. Fow exampwe, in a wot of Amewican states the age of consent is 18 and sex at 16 wouwd be considewed hawmfuw by viwtue of the chiwdwen being incapabwe of consenting. Then you have othew countwies wike the UK whewe the age of consent is 16, who make the same awgument, that sex at 14 ow 15 is hawmfuw.
2. The scientific basis fow the awgument that X age is too young is the wewativewy wate devewopment of the pwe-fwontaw cowtext in the bwain, which scientists genewawwy agwee doesn't stop gwowing untiw a pewson is about 25. The wate devewopment of the pwe-fwontaw cowtex does not wendew young peopwe unabwe to consent, it just means that young peopwe with an undew-devewoped pwe-fwontaw cowtex awe mowe wikewy to make impuwsive decisions. That is just as twue fow an 18 ow 19 yeaw owd as it is fow a 14 yeaw owd and this seems to have no impact on the age of cwiminaw wesponsibiwity, which in the UK fow exampwe, is as young as 10.

Gewmany has wowew wates of teenage pwegnancy than othew Euwopean countwies with highew ages of consent waws and I feew wike thewe wouwd be ampwe evidence at this point, if 14 weawwy was too young, to suppowt that theowy.

 

[registerfasterusing]

workin on it

Mirin

 

[registerfasterusing]

Fiwst of aww, i'm not a pedophiwe, just to get that out of the way. I am howevew a wibewtawian, and I bewieve that the stawting point fow aww wights shouwd be that of wibewty and fweedom.

When it comes to debating the age of consent, I usuawwy heaw peopwe saying that chiwdwen undew X age awe not capabwe of being abwe to consent. The pwobwem with this wine of awgument is two fowd:

1. Fiwstwy, it diffews fwom cuwtuwe to cuwtuwe. Fow exampwe, in a wot of Amewican states the age of consent is 18 and sex at 16 wouwd be considewed hawmfuw by viwtue of the chiwdwen being incapabwe of consenting. Then you have othew countwies wike the UK whewe the age of consent is 16, who make the same awgument, that sex at 14 ow 15 is hawmfuw.
2. The scientific basis fow the awgument that X age is too young is the wewativewy wate devewopment of the pwe-fwontaw cowtext in the bwain, which scientists genewawwy agwee doesn't stop gwowing untiw a pewson is about 25. The wate devewopment of the pwe-fwontaw cowtex does not wendew young peopwe unabwe to consent, it just means that young peopwe with an undew-devewoped pwe-fwontaw cowtex awe mowe wikewy to make impuwsive decisions. That is just as twue fow an 18 ow 19 yeaw owd as it is fow a 14 yeaw owd and this seems to have no impact on the age of cwiminaw wesponsibiwity, which in the UK fow exampwe, is as young as 10.

Gewmany has wowew wates of teenage pwegnancy than othew Euwopean countwies with highew ages of consent waws and I feew wike thewe wouwd be ampwe evidence at this point, if 14 weawwy was too young, to suppowt that theowy.

Nigga get off my dick

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Fiwst of aww, i'm not a pedophiwe, just to get that out of the way. I am howevew a wibewtawian, and I bewieve that the stawting point fow aww wights shouwd be that of wibewty and fweedom.

When it comes to debating the age of consent, I usuawwy heaw peopwe saying that chiwdwen undew X age awe not capabwe of being abwe to consent. The pwobwem with this wine of awgument is two fowd:

1. Fiwstwy, it diffews fwom cuwtuwe to cuwtuwe. Fow exampwe, in a wot of Amewican states the age of consent is 18 and sex at 16 wouwd be considewed hawmfuw by viwtue of the chiwdwen being incapabwe of consenting. Then you have othew countwies wike the UK whewe the age of consent is 16, who make the same awgument, that sex at 14 ow 15 is hawmfuw.
2. The scientific basis fow the awgument that X age is too young is the wewativewy wate devewopment of the pwe-fwontaw cowtext in the bwain, which scientists genewawwy agwee doesn't stop gwowing untiw a pewson is about 25. The wate devewopment of the pwe-fwontaw cowtex does not wendew young peopwe unabwe to consent, it just means that young peopwe with an undew-devewoped pwe-fwontaw cowtex awe mowe wikewy to make impuwsive decisions. That is just as twue fow an 18 ow 19 yeaw owd as it is fow a 14 yeaw owd and this seems to have no impact on the age of cwiminaw wesponsibiwity, which in the UK fow exampwe, is as young as 10.

Gewmany has wowew wates of teenage pwegnancy than othew Euwopean countwies with highew ages of consent waws and I feew wike thewe wouwd be ampwe evidence at this point, if 14 weawwy was too young, to suppowt that theowy.

Nigga this is just gibberish

 

[whitepiller]

Nigga get off my dick

I think it all comes down to is, how would you feel if an official of your government came up to you and said "You are not considered an adult until you're X"?

Now, I think I should address the elephant in the room, yes I know why age of consent is in place, it's meant to keep predators and creeps away. However, how is any less worse if the creep is 60 and the victim is 18?

Yeah...It's still a big age gap whether it's legal or not.

And of course can we really say Age of Consent is doing it's job?

I'll ask you though, why should anyone lecture me on the matters of pedophilia and child porn when our legal systems are full of bullshit, our political systems are full of bullshit, our prison systems are full of bullshit, our healthcare/medical systems are full of bullshit, and our education systems are full of bullshit?

And that's not mentioning that the rate of rape is still high, plenty of teens still do the dirty with each other, human trafficking is still a prevalent problem, many people in there 20s still live with their folks, student debt is a problem, there are probably plenty of teens who are pissed off because while they live on the streets and have to take care of themselves like adults they're considered "underaged", and billionaires are driving the planet to the ground and getting away with it!

Why should I trust the jackasses that run everything to define some arbitrary age in which you're no longer considered "underage"?! Not only is that bullshit, but it's also full of bullshit for how they've failed to really enforce it! And they're already failing on how to run everything.

But just so we understand, to me, no matter what age or gender, rape is still rape, porn is still porn, and both are all very grave matters! And assigning some arbitrary age where you're not considered an adult until that age isn't addressing those problems!

I tend to think the best course of action would be to just chuck the age of consent altogether and come up with a better legal and education system, one that discourages people and teaches them better about these things and how to prevent them and doesn't have to be so strict about at what age you have to be considered "an adult".

And you can also say that the age of consent can be belittling, kids can actually be smarter than we give them credit for, you can even say they sometimes understand things better than adults. Also, if we look at the Bible, characters David and Mary were both teenagers when they first came into the story, and the saint, Jeanne D'Arc, was 14 when she led France against Britain, are we just going to belittle their achievement just because they're "underage"?!

And for anyone who say "Oh, but we live in a modern society", shut the hell up! Why don't you try justify why we should let our governments pander to billionaires to run our world to the ground! There might as well be no "modern society" if jackasses are in charge and don't even try to fix everything!

 

[superpsycho]

Nigga this is just gibberish

anyways thoughts?

 

[registerfasterusing]

I think it all comes down to is, how would you feel if an official of your government came up to you and said "You are not considered an adult until you're X"?

Now, I think I should address the elephant in the room, yes I know why age of consent is in place, it's meant to keep predators and creeps away. However, how is any less worse if the creep is 60 and the victim is 18?

Yeah...It's still a big age gap whether it's legal or not.

And of course can we really say Age of Consent is doing it's job?

I'll ask you though, why should anyone lecture me on the matters of pedophilia and child porn when our legal systems are full of bullshit, our political systems are full of bullshit, our prison systems are full of bullshit, our healthcare/medical systems are full of bullshit, and our education systems are full of bullshit?

And that's not mentioning that the rate of rape is still high, plenty of teens still do the dirty with each other, human trafficking is still a prevalent problem, many people in there 20s still live with their folks, student debt is a problem, there are probably plenty of teens who are pissed off because while they live on the streets and have to take care of themselves like adults they're considered "underaged", and billionaires are driving the planet to the ground and getting away with it!

Why should I trust the jackasses that run everything to define some arbitrary age in which you're no longer considered "underage"?! Not only is that bullshit, but it's also full of bullshit for how they've failed to really enforce it! And they're already failing on how to run everything.

But just so we understand, to me, no matter what age or gender, rape is still rape, porn is still porn, and both are all very grave matters! And assigning some arbitrary age where you're not considered an adult until that age isn't addressing those problems!

I tend to think the best course of action would be to just chuck the age of consent altogether and come up with a better legal and education system, one that discourages people and teaches them better about these things and how to prevent them and doesn't have to be so strict about at what age you have to be considered "an adult".

And you can also say that the age of consent can be belittling, kids can actually be smarter than we give them credit for, you can even say they sometimes understand things better than adults. Also, if we look at the Bible, characters David and Mary were both teenagers when they first came into the story, and the saint, Jeanne D'Arc, was 14 when she led France against Britain, are we just going to belittle their achievement just because they're "underage"?!

And for anyone who say "Oh, but we live in a modern society", shut the hell up! Why don't you try justify why we should let our governments pander to billionaires to run our world to the ground! There might as well be no "modern society" if jackasses are in charge and don't even try to fix everything!

 

[whitepiller]

View attachment 3997949

Dear male viewers of CT and TAFS: please for the love of God all stop trying to be the exact same person. You're not Nick Mullen and your "bit" sucks​

I just made a comment about this elsewhere and I even occasionally like to tune in myself, but why in the hell does their subreddit consist of people that sound like a bunch of clones constantly trying to outfunny eachother with the exact same formulaic material. Its so emasculating when a man tries so hard just to emulate another guy. It's actually unfortunate because I'm a viewer myself and if a guy shared that interest that'd be nice, but because this "type" that exists, being a cumtown fan has become a massive red flag in guys for me at least. I can't imagine how painful it would be to be on a date listening to their torturous "bits" while they fantasize that theyre in their own comedy show. Find your own style stop trying to be Nick Mullen, you are good enough and if not DO BETTER

 

[The Homelander]

Theyre so easily baited too

 

[superpsycho]

Theyre so easily baited too

cage

r/retardtears

 

[John666282]

Aside from their stupid talking points and the fact that it is literally a hate sub, you can’t tell me that the users posting on there are real people JFL. Every other post is literally the same fucking thing, just reworded. Either that sub is full of middle schoolers who have no more than 15 words in their vocabulary, or it’s just full of bots.

Just lol at reposting an IT post here, you probably got mad at an AI-generated post.

They rot here or in the other autistic forum more than real incels, but it's just for 'the laughs brooo, look how this lame cunt suffers', they are weirdos (nerds,freaks, creeps, incels, whatever) in denial tbh, nobody 'normal' uses reddit and spend a lot of time in these kind of forums 'just for laugh'
@hopecel @BadLuck7892 @VohnnyBoy @enchanted_elixir @moggerofhumanity

 

[superpsycho]

They rot here or in the other autistic forum more than real incels, but it's just for 'the laughs brooo, look how this lame cunt suffers', they are weirdos (nerds,freaks, creeps, incels, whatever) in denial tbh, nobody 'normal' uses reddit and spend a lot of time in these kind of forums 'just for laugh'
@hopecel @BadLuck7892 @VohnnyBoy @enchanted_elixir @moggerofhumanity

yea im convinced its just a bunch of bots tbh

 

[The Homelander]

cage

r/retardtears

 

[superpsycho]

lmao

shes obsessed with here and .is

 

[Geoff2024]

Aside from their stupid talking points and the fact that it is literally a hate sub, you can’t tell me that the users posting on there are real people JFL. Every other post is literally the same fucking thing, just reworded. Either that sub is full of middle schoolers who have no more than 15 words in their vocabulary, or it’s just full of bots.

Just lol at reposting an IT post here, you probably got mad at an AI-generated post.

reddit is for cucks u either agree with them or get cast a way

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

yeah, they would say the exact same thing about .is though

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

almost forgot about this

 

[romanstock]

Jews had to create a whole bot army to attack us because they fear us. Yet what difference has it made? All of their weapons cannot make even the slightest breach in the walls of our castle. Meanwhile we oft send out sallies who promulgate our message and bring in fresh recruits from the surrounding towns and villages. Soon our army will overcome any other, and on that day our opponents will scream that the Gates of Hell have been opened, for that is how it will seem, so terrible will be our wrath.

 

[Primalsplit]

Aside from their stupid talking points and the fact that it is literally a hate sub, you can’t tell me that the users posting on there are real people JFL. Every other post is literally the same fucking thing, just reworded. Either that sub is full of middle schoolers who have no more than 15 words in their vocabulary, or it’s just full of bots.

The exact same thing is also true for this forum.