Race is the biggest cope ever.

[Deleted member 4383]

Race does not matter whatsoever. You're not incel because of your race, you're incel because you're ugly. Race has NOTHING to do with that.

Women don't discriminate between race. They discriminate between UGLY and GOOD LOOKING.

The problem is though that certain races are much less attractive on average than others. Whites and blacks look much better on average than Orientals or Indians for example

If you were chadullah, you would slay. If you were Tyrone, you would slay. If you were chang, you would slay. All just as much as Chad slays.

Race is COPE.

 

[penis3]

 

[Suave]

besides from indian shtskin and gooks, i agree, i had this twink blonde fagg think he mogged me solely bc of his race i was caging

 

[bonesoverblood]

Race does not matter whatsoever. You're not incel because of your race, you're incel because you're ugly. Race has NOTHING to do with that.

Women don't discriminate between race. They discriminate between UGLY and GOOD LOOKING.

The problem is though that certain races are much less attractive on average than others. Whites and blacks look much better on average than Orientals or Indians for example

If you were chadullah, you would slay. If you were Tyrone, you would slay. If you were chang, you would slay. All just as much as Chad slays.

Race is COPE.

Race can play a part genetically, looks wise


Whites: Hair & Collagen Reaper

Blacks: No Chin, Big Lips, Nose

Hispanics: I really don't know but obesity?

Asians: Everything

 

[Deleted member 6856]

@reptiles
Meanwhile South Indians:

 

[Deleted member 7697]

Blcks and Indians should not be rewarded sex by wimen. Only white Guys.

 

[Suave]

Race can play a part genetically, looks wise


Whites: Hair & Collagen Reaper

Blacks: No Chin, Big Lips, Nose

Hispanics: I really don't know but obesity?

Asians: Everything

ETHNICITY IS NOT RACE, GOOD SHT THX FOR THE LAUGH

 

[DrunkenSailor]

Agreed
Its just retarded stormfrontcels coping real hard about it

 

[Deleted member 2527]

online dating experiments & statistics would beg to differ

 

[bonesoverblood]

No it s not. Race matters when building civilisations. Slaying women is the prize for doing that.

Blcks and Indians should not be rewarded sex by wimen

Are you asian?

 

[Deleted member 7697]

Are you asian?

No i am white

 

[Deleted member 5891]

Idc what you say

 

[Aesthetics_III]

Are you fucking retarded? Do you not understand that race = looks?

Both male models, both mog upwards of 90% of their respective races, but one is still clearly better looking.

Not to mention that people generally stick to their own race in terms of dating.

 

[Danish_Retard]

Damn bruh we having went over this so many times. Let's do it again just for you with a couple of studies.

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
(courtesy of rageagainstTDL)



Let's also look at 13k's post from .co:

Today's blackpill thread will be about "Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender and Education"

It is based on results from the study, from Ken-Hou Lin of The University of Texas and Jennifer Lundquist of U. Mass Amherst, published in The American Journal of Sociology. The study finds that significant racial preferences exist regardless of education status.

I've skimmed through the study for you guys and now I will be sharing simple takeaways for the lazycels who don't wanna read it all. The study looked at a large dataset from one of the most popular dating sites of more than 9 million users who sent more than 200 million messages from November 2003 to 2010.

Takeaways:

1- The likelihood someone will send an initial message to a person of their own and other races, regardless of other factors like socioeconomic status and body type. A darker panel reflects a higher likelihood of contact:


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa469bedd927760db2c-640-393-jpg.9884/

As you all already know, white men are getting MOST messages from ALL races except black women. And now lets look at what are odds for responding;

2- Predicted odds of responding to an initial message based on race


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa4eab8ead8519f9e90-750-458-jpg.9883/


This one also should be already known by everybody since literally every single experiment and data shows same. Women of ALL RACES are responding to white senders at heightest ratio. And similarly Men of all races respond to white and asian women at highest ratio.

3-EDUCATION
this is the part of the study that, I personally believe, sets the study apart from other online dating experients. It also includes EDUCATION into the equation. Now lets see if normslimes "muh education and being self-rounded person" meme have any validity to it:

"One of the most fascinating findings is that for white daters, education status plays essentially no role in changing racial preference, as the below chart of the likelihood of response shows"


https://incels.is/attachments/5282987becad049f7f5f3d49-750-719-jpg.9885/


White men and women with a college degree, are more likely to respond to white daters without a college degree than to black daters who have a degree.

4-ASIAN FEMALE / WHITE MALE COUPLES EXPLAINED

"people often assume the relative prevalence of white male/Asian woman couples come from white men's apparent preference for stereotypically submissive women. It turns out they show no such preference, and that it's Asian women who tend to be relatively more receptive to white men."

White men dont necessarily have a "yellow-fever". it is the noodlewhores that worship white dick.

5- You can't take foids' statments at their face value

"In addition to emphasizing the degree to which race affects how we partner up online, it also adds some interesting new wisdom. For example, racial boundaries tend to be more important when people search, and less important when people respond."

Study finds out even people who say "race doesnt matter" hate ethnics with a BURNING PASSION.

"When attracted to other groups, only some daters are welcomed to cross the borders. In this sense, racial boundaries function similarly to one-way turnstile gates. While non-black daters, particularly white men, are well received when they contact daters of other groups, black daters, particularly black women, are largely confined to a segregated dating market."


Sources:
Ken-Hou Lin and Jennifer Lundquist American Journal of Sociology

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/673129

(for free download of pdf version of the study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...The_Intersection_of_Race_Gender_and_Education )

 

[Nosecel]

White smv > any other smv
Women HATE any other race except white

 

[Deleted member 6856]

White smv > any other smv
Women HATE any other race except white

meanwhile exotic chads:

@Sikkunt23

 

[Nosecel]

meanwhile exotic chads:
View attachment 465187
@Sikkunt23

He is fucking WHITE, nigger. MUH exotic, he is white.

 

[Sikkunt23]

meanwhile exotic chads:
View attachment 465187
@Sikkunt23

Honestly phenotypes like gandy , Sean o pry , and cavil MOG MOG MOG . I know they are white but they are the rarest type . White guys that have light coluring don’t look as good

 

[Deleted member 6856]

He is fucking WHITE, nigger. MUH exotic, he is white.

He is clearly south american jfl@u no tan give a white this skin

 

[Beetlejuice]

 

[Deleted member 1862]

Damn bruh we having went over this so many times. Let's do it again just for you with a couple of studies.

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
(courtesy of rageagainstTDL)



Let's also look at 13k's post from .co:

Today's blackpill thread will be about "Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender and Education"

It is based on results from the study, from Ken-Hou Lin of The University of Texas and Jennifer Lundquist of U. Mass Amherst, published in The American Journal of Sociology. The study finds that significant racial preferences exist regardless of education status.

I've skimmed through the study for you guys and now I will be sharing simple takeaways for the lazycels who don't wanna read it all. The study looked at a large dataset from one of the most popular dating sites of more than 9 million users who sent more than 200 million messages from November 2003 to 2010.

Takeaways:

1- The likelihood someone will send an initial message to a person of their own and other races, regardless of other factors like socioeconomic status and body type. A darker panel reflects a higher likelihood of contact:


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa469bedd927760db2c-640-393-jpg.9884/

As you all already know, white men are getting MOST messages from ALL races except black women. And now lets look at what are odds for responding;

2- Predicted odds of responding to an initial message based on race


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa4eab8ead8519f9e90-750-458-jpg.9883/


This one also should be already known by everybody since literally every single experiment and data shows same. Women of ALL RACES are responding to white senders at heightest ratio. And similarly Men of all races respond to white and asian women at highest ratio.

3-EDUCATION
this is the part of the study that, I personally believe, sets the study apart from other online dating experients. It also includes EDUCATION into the equation. Now lets see if normslimes "muh education and being self-rounded person" meme have any validity to it:

"One of the most fascinating findings is that for white daters, education status plays essentially no role in changing racial preference, as the below chart of the likelihood of response shows"


https://incels.is/attachments/5282987becad049f7f5f3d49-750-719-jpg.9885/


White men and women with a college degree, are more likely to respond to white daters without a college degree than to black daters who have a degree.

4-ASIAN FEMALE / WHITE MALE COUPLES EXPLAINED

"people often assume the relative prevalence of white male/Asian woman couples come from white men's apparent preference for stereotypically submissive women. It turns out they show no such preference, and that it's Asian women who tend to be relatively more receptive to white men."

White men dont necessarily have a "yellow-fever". it is the noodlewhores that worship white dick.

5- You can't take foids' statments at their face value

"In addition to emphasizing the degree to which race affects how we partner up online, it also adds some interesting new wisdom. For example, racial boundaries tend to be more important when people search, and less important when people respond."

Study finds out even people who say "race doesnt matter" hate ethnics with a BURNING PASSION.

"When attracted to other groups, only some daters are welcomed to cross the borders. In this sense, racial boundaries function similarly to one-way turnstile gates. While non-black daters, particularly white men, are well received when they contact daters of other groups, black daters, particularly black women, are largely confined to a segregated dating market."


Sources:
Ken-Hou Lin and Jennifer Lundquist American Journal of Sociology

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/673129

(for free download of pdf version of the study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...The_Intersection_of_Race_Gender_and_Education )

interesting study, is there anything more recent?

 

[Deleted member 7697]

The Day will come when we are All Chads and wimen will not descriminate

 

[Entschuldigung]

meanwhile exotic chads:
View attachment 465187
@Sikkunt23

He looks white/arab white/latin :/

 

[nastynas]

old news.

chads are a race of their own, after that point it just goes down to women preference

 

[Deleted member 6856]

He looks white :/

by 2030 white definition

 

[Danish_Retard]

interesting study, is there anything more recent?

Not that I know of, I'm white so not really something I have concerned myself with. Feel free to make a high effort thread about any new studies if you can find them. I'll give a react.

 

[Deleted member 1862]

Damn bruh we having went over this so many times. Let's do it again just for you with a couple of studies.

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
(courtesy of rageagainstTDL)



Let's also look at 13k's post from .co:

Today's blackpill thread will be about "Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender and Education"

It is based on results from the study, from Ken-Hou Lin of The University of Texas and Jennifer Lundquist of U. Mass Amherst, published in The American Journal of Sociology. The study finds that significant racial preferences exist regardless of education status.

I've skimmed through the study for you guys and now I will be sharing simple takeaways for the lazycels who don't wanna read it all. The study looked at a large dataset from one of the most popular dating sites of more than 9 million users who sent more than 200 million messages from November 2003 to 2010.

Takeaways:

1- The likelihood someone will send an initial message to a person of their own and other races, regardless of other factors like socioeconomic status and body type. A darker panel reflects a higher likelihood of contact:


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa469bedd927760db2c-640-393-jpg.9884/

As you all already know, white men are getting MOST messages from ALL races except black women. And now lets look at what are odds for responding;

2- Predicted odds of responding to an initial message based on race


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa4eab8ead8519f9e90-750-458-jpg.9883/


This one also should be already known by everybody since literally every single experiment and data shows same. Women of ALL RACES are responding to white senders at heightest ratio. And similarly Men of all races respond to white and asian women at highest ratio.

3-EDUCATION
this is the part of the study that, I personally believe, sets the study apart from other online dating experients. It also includes EDUCATION into the equation. Now lets see if normslimes "muh education and being self-rounded person" meme have any validity to it:

"One of the most fascinating findings is that for white daters, education status plays essentially no role in changing racial preference, as the below chart of the likelihood of response shows"


https://incels.is/attachments/5282987becad049f7f5f3d49-750-719-jpg.9885/


White men and women with a college degree, are more likely to respond to white daters without a college degree than to black daters who have a degree.

4-ASIAN FEMALE / WHITE MALE COUPLES EXPLAINED

"people often assume the relative prevalence of white male/Asian woman couples come from white men's apparent preference for stereotypically submissive women. It turns out they show no such preference, and that it's Asian women who tend to be relatively more receptive to white men."

White men dont necessarily have a "yellow-fever". it is the noodlewhores that worship white dick.

5- You can't take foids' statments at their face value

"In addition to emphasizing the degree to which race affects how we partner up online, it also adds some interesting new wisdom. For example, racial boundaries tend to be more important when people search, and less important when people respond."

Study finds out even people who say "race doesnt matter" hate ethnics with a BURNING PASSION.

"When attracted to other groups, only some daters are welcomed to cross the borders. In this sense, racial boundaries function similarly to one-way turnstile gates. While non-black daters, particularly white men, are well received when they contact daters of other groups, black daters, particularly black women, are largely confined to a segregated dating market."


Sources:
Ken-Hou Lin and Jennifer Lundquist American Journal of Sociology

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/673129

(for free download of pdf version of the study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...The_Intersection_of_Race_Gender_and_Education )

also, stating Race > Height > Face > Money is pretty bold considering face, height and money CLEARLY come before race.

Are you going to sit here and tell me that an ugly ass white dude has a better chance with prime women than a rich, tall, gl dude of [insert any race here]?

GL is GL and that always comes first.

Everything matters, but face & height are the foundation.

edit: I get your point btw, just think it might not be so wise to put race ABOVE the face and height

 

[Danish_Retard]

also, stating Race > Height > Face > Money is pretty bold considering face, height and money CLEARLY come before race.

Are you going to sit here and tell me that an ugly ass white dude has a better chance with prime women than a rich, tall, gl dude of [insert any race here]?

GL is GL and that always comes first.

Everything matters, but face & height are the foundation.

edit: I get your point btw, just think it might not be so wise to put race ABOVE the face and height

As we can see from the studies, race is also a foundation.

 

[Deleted member 7697]

View attachment 465192

Exceptions exist. Good looking non whites get Free pas.

 

[Deleted member 5746]

I am an incel because of my race. If I wasnt white I would slay

 

[disillusioned]

Race does not matter whatsoever. You're not incel because of your race, you're incel because you're ugly. Race has NOTHING to do with that.

Women don't discriminate between race. They discriminate between UGLY and GOOD LOOKING.

The problem is though that certain races are much less attractive on average than others. Whites and blacks look much better on average than Orientals or Indians for example

If you were chadullah, you would slay. If you were Tyrone, you would slay. If you were chang, you would slay. All just as much as Chad slays.

Race is COPE.

Been saying this for years. You could belong to a race where 99% of males are 1/10 inbred degenerates but if you belonged to the 1% that was chad you would still slay absolutely regardless of what things are like for the other 99%. Ultimately you are either just good looking or you are not, so blaming any other factor than looks is ultimately just cope.

 

[Uglybrazilian]

I agree that no one is incel because of race, thats a huge cope

But Race does play a role in relationships(althought not in attraction imo)

For example: a 6 PSL nigga will be turned off by a 6 or even 5 PSL white just because most girls think dating a black man is a statusmin(most men think the same about black girls too, even I used to think like that before)

 

[honky]

It's mostly betabuxxers bitching about it.

 

[Tyronecell]

White smv > any other smv
Women HATE any other race except white

 

[honky]

Damn bruh we having went over this so many times. Let's do it again just for you with a couple of studies.

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
(courtesy of rageagainstTDL)



Let's also look at 13k's post from .co:

Today's blackpill thread will be about "Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender and Education"

It is based on results from the study, from Ken-Hou Lin of The University of Texas and Jennifer Lundquist of U. Mass Amherst, published in The American Journal of Sociology. The study finds that significant racial preferences exist regardless of education status.

I've skimmed through the study for you guys and now I will be sharing simple takeaways for the lazycels who don't wanna read it all. The study looked at a large dataset from one of the most popular dating sites of more than 9 million users who sent more than 200 million messages from November 2003 to 2010.

Takeaways:

1- The likelihood someone will send an initial message to a person of their own and other races, regardless of other factors like socioeconomic status and body type. A darker panel reflects a higher likelihood of contact:


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa469bedd927760db2c-640-393-jpg.9884/

As you all already know, white men are getting MOST messages from ALL races except black women. And now lets look at what are odds for responding;

2- Predicted odds of responding to an initial message based on race


https://incels.is/attachments/52827aa4eab8ead8519f9e90-750-458-jpg.9883/


This one also should be already known by everybody since literally every single experiment and data shows same. Women of ALL RACES are responding to white senders at heightest ratio. And similarly Men of all races respond to white and asian women at highest ratio.

3-EDUCATION
this is the part of the study that, I personally believe, sets the study apart from other online dating experients. It also includes EDUCATION into the equation. Now lets see if normslimes "muh education and being self-rounded person" meme have any validity to it:

"One of the most fascinating findings is that for white daters, education status plays essentially no role in changing racial preference, as the below chart of the likelihood of response shows"


https://incels.is/attachments/5282987becad049f7f5f3d49-750-719-jpg.9885/


White men and women with a college degree, are more likely to respond to white daters without a college degree than to black daters who have a degree.

4-ASIAN FEMALE / WHITE MALE COUPLES EXPLAINED

"people often assume the relative prevalence of white male/Asian woman couples come from white men's apparent preference for stereotypically submissive women. It turns out they show no such preference, and that it's Asian women who tend to be relatively more receptive to white men."

White men dont necessarily have a "yellow-fever". it is the noodlewhores that worship white dick.

5- You can't take foids' statments at their face value

"In addition to emphasizing the degree to which race affects how we partner up online, it also adds some interesting new wisdom. For example, racial boundaries tend to be more important when people search, and less important when people respond."

Study finds out even people who say "race doesnt matter" hate ethnics with a BURNING PASSION.

"When attracted to other groups, only some daters are welcomed to cross the borders. In this sense, racial boundaries function similarly to one-way turnstile gates. While non-black daters, particularly white men, are well received when they contact daters of other groups, black daters, particularly black women, are largely confined to a segregated dating market."


Sources:
Ken-Hou Lin and Jennifer Lundquist American Journal of Sociology

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673129?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/673129

(for free download of pdf version of the study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...The_Intersection_of_Race_Gender_and_Education )

That's fucking stupid. It's all relative to your location and changing of culture. Asians make up less than 6 percent of America but do as much bitching as the nig nogs. 3/4ths of Asian live in urban areas and 5 percent rural. Fuck them!