Yusu
Juliencentral Fanboy 2020/2021 ππ
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
- Posts
- 1,445
- Reputation
- 1,280
I used a translator, my English is actually ridiculous.
Appearance demonstrates three things to us simply said:
Genetics: One aspect demonstrates health and lack of disease (intact genetics). The other aspect demonstrates rarity, variability and compatibility. Rarity in the sense of multiple hair colors, eye color. Compatibility in the sense of complementary immune system to the woman (not too similar, not too different). So healthy skin, missing anomalies, missing diseases.
Symmetry: (not so important, unless there are strong asymmetries): Here the question is: Did the person grow up healthy? Studies show that unhealthy lifestyles and an unhealthy environment can lead to asymmetries or even anomalies. If someone is very symmetrical, they have grown up in a safe, healthy environment. However, if a person appears asymmetric but otherwise healthy and is able to cope with his environment, even though the asymmetry is noticeable, the importance of the asymmetry is small.
Gender specificity: Your forum focus is strong here. Facial features that indicate masculinity, i.e. testosterone / Dht and harmonize, show woman and man: The person may be dominant, strong, charismatic, less fearful (testosterone) and healthy (harmony).
In order to have a basic attractiveness or at least not to be considered ugly, the following things must be given:
- Healthy or halfway healthy genetics ( less diseases, not too bad skin etc.).
- Minimum level of symmetry
- Facial Harmonies
In order to be considered attractive, certain gender-specific aspects should be added, otherwise you are only "healthy, human, okay".
Now for your thinking mistake:
You get a couple of out-of-context videos of attractive and unattractive people through your red pill, where women react differently. You are constantly being told here that you have to strive for perfection and that looks are everything. Of course we like attractiveness. Of course it brings a halo effect. Of course it stimulates the woman's imagination and makes her wonder what this attractive person is like (Mysterious)
However, attractiveness is not only appearance, definitely not.
I try to make it clear to you:
First, our basic sexuality. Men want as many women as possible. That's why we are so needy and can inject every day and theoretically have several children. We want to spread our genes.
Women want 1. to have children with an attractive man (genetics ok, compatible etc.), but he must also have a second component, which is about as important and in certain contexts more important than attractiveness (but only if you have the "basic attractiveness"): 2. HIGHEST STATUS (you can simulate this with behaviour easily).
Women want "alpha" behaviour. The thing about Hunter Eyes, Big Massester etc. is that they signal "alphaness". But if an Alpha in the Stone Age gets hold of a woman and wants to convince her of himself, but is extremely fearful and shows no self-confidence, what does this man bring to the woman? A very important aspect is missing: security
The important behavioral components of a man are: self-confidence and non needyness (shows you have enough woman). Why?
Well, the world used to be a much more dangerous place. Women are the weaker, more naive sex. They are also the ones who have strong maternal instincts and walk around 9 months pregnant (weak). How the hell is such a woman supposed to survive alone in the wilderness or in front of hostile groups? With a son of a bitch next to her who looks like Sean o pry but is afraid of every ant? Ha ha ha no. She absolutely needs someone who knows how to defend himself and can act fast. Who can control himself, is technically gifted etc etc. You know what I mean? Looks ALONE is nothing, it signals alpha behavior BUT if you behave extremely wrong as an attractive man, you still fuck up.
A woman used to have to weigh up the pros and cons: If an extremely attractive but beta man presents himself or a basic attractive one (his genes are enough...) but who is self-confident and the attractive amogt, then she thinks: My child survives if I take the basic attractive one, even if his genes are not sooo horny, but they are enough.
Women have an EXTREMELY SENSITIVE sensor who is self-conscious and who is not. And this determines mainly who she finds attractive (IF BASIC ATRACTIVITY IS ALREADY THERE). Women hate betas.
Let's move on: In the past, it also had tribes. There was usually one Alpha or some Alphas, the rest Betas (and Gammas). The alphas had the greatest access to women. Who were the alphas? This was certainly determined not only by appearance, size and strength, but also by social intelligence, intelligence, skills, knowledge, humor, SELF CONSCIOUSNESS. In the past, of course, it was easier to show alphaness when you were taller, stronger. But today everybody can show it without any consequences! (In former times the alphas would have beheaded you)
Now my question is: Would the women in such a tribe rather fuck the basic attractive alpha who gives orders, has food, owns the area or the more attractive beta who has nothing to say? I think the answer is so obvious. That's why rich but ugly ones have such great success with women, since money signals status these days.
But you know what also signals status? Self-confidence (as well as C&F, Nonneedynes, Self amusement etc...)
If someone comes here with a strong self-confidence, doesn't let himself be put down, doesn't show needyness, then he already beats 80% of the men. Now if he looks healthy and not ugly, he can fuck a lot.
Women always want the man with higher status. It's called hypergamy. If she's dating a millionaire, she still wants to be with a billionaire. Women feel that. But when do women leave their current man for someone of higher status? When he starts acting like BETA, paying too much attention to her, neglecting his friends for her. But if he continues to behave alpha (not an asshole), she will still feel attraction for him. (Or leave because she think she will loose you for another girl)
I have seen so many normal looking, even short dudes fucking EXTREMELY pretty women (IN REAL LIFE, WITHOUT MONEY OR HUNTER EYES OR SOME SHIT). Only through C&F, confidence, humor, social proof, preselection... These social tools are GOOOLD. Face is GOLD. Status is GOLD (with correct behaviour). Height is SILVER. Rest doesnt matter.
Bye
Appearance demonstrates three things to us simply said:
Genetics: One aspect demonstrates health and lack of disease (intact genetics). The other aspect demonstrates rarity, variability and compatibility. Rarity in the sense of multiple hair colors, eye color. Compatibility in the sense of complementary immune system to the woman (not too similar, not too different). So healthy skin, missing anomalies, missing diseases.
Symmetry: (not so important, unless there are strong asymmetries): Here the question is: Did the person grow up healthy? Studies show that unhealthy lifestyles and an unhealthy environment can lead to asymmetries or even anomalies. If someone is very symmetrical, they have grown up in a safe, healthy environment. However, if a person appears asymmetric but otherwise healthy and is able to cope with his environment, even though the asymmetry is noticeable, the importance of the asymmetry is small.
Gender specificity: Your forum focus is strong here. Facial features that indicate masculinity, i.e. testosterone / Dht and harmonize, show woman and man: The person may be dominant, strong, charismatic, less fearful (testosterone) and healthy (harmony).
In order to have a basic attractiveness or at least not to be considered ugly, the following things must be given:
- Healthy or halfway healthy genetics ( less diseases, not too bad skin etc.).
- Minimum level of symmetry
- Facial Harmonies
In order to be considered attractive, certain gender-specific aspects should be added, otherwise you are only "healthy, human, okay".
Now for your thinking mistake:
You get a couple of out-of-context videos of attractive and unattractive people through your red pill, where women react differently. You are constantly being told here that you have to strive for perfection and that looks are everything. Of course we like attractiveness. Of course it brings a halo effect. Of course it stimulates the woman's imagination and makes her wonder what this attractive person is like (Mysterious)
However, attractiveness is not only appearance, definitely not.
I try to make it clear to you:
First, our basic sexuality. Men want as many women as possible. That's why we are so needy and can inject every day and theoretically have several children. We want to spread our genes.
Women want 1. to have children with an attractive man (genetics ok, compatible etc.), but he must also have a second component, which is about as important and in certain contexts more important than attractiveness (but only if you have the "basic attractiveness"): 2. HIGHEST STATUS (you can simulate this with behaviour easily).
Women want "alpha" behaviour. The thing about Hunter Eyes, Big Massester etc. is that they signal "alphaness". But if an Alpha in the Stone Age gets hold of a woman and wants to convince her of himself, but is extremely fearful and shows no self-confidence, what does this man bring to the woman? A very important aspect is missing: security
The important behavioral components of a man are: self-confidence and non needyness (shows you have enough woman). Why?
Well, the world used to be a much more dangerous place. Women are the weaker, more naive sex. They are also the ones who have strong maternal instincts and walk around 9 months pregnant (weak). How the hell is such a woman supposed to survive alone in the wilderness or in front of hostile groups? With a son of a bitch next to her who looks like Sean o pry but is afraid of every ant? Ha ha ha no. She absolutely needs someone who knows how to defend himself and can act fast. Who can control himself, is technically gifted etc etc. You know what I mean? Looks ALONE is nothing, it signals alpha behavior BUT if you behave extremely wrong as an attractive man, you still fuck up.
A woman used to have to weigh up the pros and cons: If an extremely attractive but beta man presents himself or a basic attractive one (his genes are enough...) but who is self-confident and the attractive amogt, then she thinks: My child survives if I take the basic attractive one, even if his genes are not sooo horny, but they are enough.
Women have an EXTREMELY SENSITIVE sensor who is self-conscious and who is not. And this determines mainly who she finds attractive (IF BASIC ATRACTIVITY IS ALREADY THERE). Women hate betas.
Let's move on: In the past, it also had tribes. There was usually one Alpha or some Alphas, the rest Betas (and Gammas). The alphas had the greatest access to women. Who were the alphas? This was certainly determined not only by appearance, size and strength, but also by social intelligence, intelligence, skills, knowledge, humor, SELF CONSCIOUSNESS. In the past, of course, it was easier to show alphaness when you were taller, stronger. But today everybody can show it without any consequences! (In former times the alphas would have beheaded you)
Now my question is: Would the women in such a tribe rather fuck the basic attractive alpha who gives orders, has food, owns the area or the more attractive beta who has nothing to say? I think the answer is so obvious. That's why rich but ugly ones have such great success with women, since money signals status these days.
But you know what also signals status? Self-confidence (as well as C&F, Nonneedynes, Self amusement etc...)
If someone comes here with a strong self-confidence, doesn't let himself be put down, doesn't show needyness, then he already beats 80% of the men. Now if he looks healthy and not ugly, he can fuck a lot.
Women always want the man with higher status. It's called hypergamy. If she's dating a millionaire, she still wants to be with a billionaire. Women feel that. But when do women leave their current man for someone of higher status? When he starts acting like BETA, paying too much attention to her, neglecting his friends for her. But if he continues to behave alpha (not an asshole), she will still feel attraction for him. (Or leave because she think she will loose you for another girl)
I have seen so many normal looking, even short dudes fucking EXTREMELY pretty women (IN REAL LIFE, WITHOUT MONEY OR HUNTER EYES OR SOME SHIT). Only through C&F, confidence, humor, social proof, preselection... These social tools are GOOOLD. Face is GOLD. Status is GOLD (with correct behaviour). Height is SILVER. Rest doesnt matter.
Bye
Last edited:
