Rate Indian-ized Taylor Hill.

john2

john2

Gyneolatry Fiend
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Posts
18,467
Reputation
31,307
Image 30 3 2023 at 1142 pm

Image 30 3 2023 at 1125 pm


She looks really hot in the morph imo. Not the ideal colouring though, but still an improvement, feature-wise.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 7926, Anchor_Ship, Deleted member 15854 and 2 others
Taylor hill wo makeup is Indian tho
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7926, bwrauycnee, Deleted member 23778 and 1 other person
very hot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: john2
descended tho
 
Correct. She looks so masculine in the original picture when compared to my morph.
yeah definitely ascended but the undertone is still better than most Indians
 
  • +1
Reactions: john2
descended tho
I think she ascended. Her facial features are clearly better now. Why exactly do you think she descended? Is it because of the coloring? I already stated that her coloring isn't ideal. But I'll try morphing her again with lighter skin, while still keeping the new feminine facial features I gave her.

yeah definitely ascended but the undertone is still better than most Indians
Yes I agree. Most Indians have a yellowish brown undertone. Hers is red, which is pretty much globally considered more attractive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16515
I think she ascended. Her facial features are clearly better now. Why exactly do you think she descended? Is it because of the coloring? I already stated that her coloring isn't ideal. But I'll try morphing her again with lighter skin, while still keeping the new feminine facial features I gave her

I don’t like deathnics
 
but u completely changed her features too
 
  • +1
Reactions: john2
I don’t like deathnics
Well same here boyo, despite being one. Women don't like deathnics either. I've been trying to get rid of the darkness on her orbitals/under her eyes, but I need a pro version of the app I am using to morph her.
but u completely changed her features too
Yeah, feature wise she is purely Caucasoid now and I think if every ethnic had perfect Caucasoid facial features like her, then they would all be very good looking. If I didn't change her features, then she would look repulsive.

Most ethnic people imo have a facial feature problem more than a skin colour based problem, unless they're south Indians.
 
  • +1
Reactions: User49
Taylor hill looks strikingly similar to one girl from my class if she wasn't fat.
 
lOoks indian in both
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16515
Ew
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Nebula
taylor hill is definitely part ethnic, she doesnt look white
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7926 and Xangsane
You made her look worse, but not due to the coloring.
 
The smaller jaw, nose, and brows were not improvements.
Are you into men or something? Women are supposed to have smaller noses, jaws and thinner eyebrows.

Morph any female face with a taller jaw, thicker eyebrows and a bigger nose... the face will look like that of a man's at the end.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Are you into men or something? Women are supposed to have smaller noses, jaws and thinner eyebrows.

Morph any female face with a taller jaw, thicker eyebrows and a bigger nose... the face will look like that of a man's at the end.
I remember already having this pointless argument with you. None of her features are masculine enough to the point of being detrimental. Her sister would be that example.
mackinley-hill-and-taylor-hill.jpg
 
None of her features are masculine enough to the point of being detrimental.
I never said her facial features are at a point where they are too masculine and make her look like a man. You still admit that her features are masculine (not necessarily extremely masculine), which is exactly what I am saying. Women need to be as feminine as possible to be closer to 8 PSL. This gif is self explanatory. Jaws need to be narrower on women and noses need to be tinier and skinnier on women.

3240364 3192753 JjCNvZn


Taylor's chin is clearly wide, which is a masculine facial feature.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane and sub5inchcel
I never said her facial features are at a point where they are too masculine and make her look like a man. You still admit that her features are masculine (not necessarily extremely masculine), which is exactly what I am saying. Women need to be as feminine as possible to be closer to 8 PSL. This gif is self explanatory. Jaws need to be narrower on women and noses need to be tinier and skinnier on women.

View attachment 2130178

Taylor's chin is clearly wide, which is a masculine facial feature.
Her skull doesn't look as impressive as other models'. Your morph has made that discrepancy even worse.
1024full-isabeli-fontana.jpg
 
Her skull doesn't look as impressive as other models'. Your morph has made that discrepancy even worse.
1024full-isabeli-fontana.jpg
The foid in the middle looks like a man, she has more of a warrior skull than an angelic skull. Lol if you think that is more impressive or closer to ideal... if anything, it is more masculine. Taylor's skull is the best looking, most feminine and most angelic looking skull among them. She looks so submissive and delicate, which is the ideal look on females. Her slight mandibular recession helps her achieve this submissive look.

If you knew a thing or two about basic looks theory, you would know that large neurocraniums are a feminine trait... which is why men look so subhuman, vulnerable and weak with larger neurocraniums. I'm aware that in this picture, the full head of the model in the middle of the picture isn't visible, but I'm sure her neurocranium is either just as big or smaller, which is masculine. The same is with the foid on the very left, she looks less feminine than Taylor because of her neurocranium size.

Also, from the pic, you can clearly see that Taylor, like a normal female, has a rounded protrusive forehead unlike the two other 'female' models. I bet you think this also doesn't look 'impressive' because of your androgyny-centred idealisations of female aesthetics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Offensive Bias and sub5inchcel
The foid in the middle looks like a man, she has more of a warrior skull than an angelic skull. Lol if you think that is more impressive or closer to ideal... if anything, it is more masculine. Taylor's skull is the best looking, most feminine and most angelic looking skull among them. She looks so submissive and delicate, which is the ideal look on females. Her slight mandibular recession helps her achieve this submissive look.

If you knew a thing or two about basic looks theory, you would know that large neurocraniums are a feminine trait... which is why men look so subhuman, vulnerable and weak with larger neurocraniums. I'm aware that in this picture, the full head of the model in the middle of the picture isn't visible, but I'm sure her neurocranium is either just as big or smaller, which is masculine. The same is with the foid on the very left, she looks less feminine than Taylor because of her neurocranium size.

Also, from the pic, you can clearly see that Taylor, like a normal female, has a rounded protrusive forehead unlike the two other 'female' models. I bet you think this also doesn't look 'impressive' because of your androgyny-centred idealisations of female aesthetics.
Mandibular recession isn't beneficial for either sex. Neoteny is important for females, but so are developed, prominent bones. Next, you'll be saying that she isn't "submissive" enough due to being over 5'9.
 
Mandibular recession isn't beneficial for either sex.
I never said her mandibular recession is ideal anyway, it should be a little protrusive. I was talking about her skull and how her large neurocranium size plays a huge role in making her look feminine.

Neoteny is important for females, but so are developed, prominent bones.
There's a limit to bone structure show. Women can't have really protrusive, wide and large jaws. Women are supposed to have forward grown maxillas and protrusive cheekbones, but not hollow cheeks imo because that is PSL autism. Two much bone definition makes a foid look masculine. Neoteny is to be given more importance.

Next, you'll be saying that she isn't "submissive" enough due to being over 5'9.
I've changed my opinion on height.
I'm 6'1.5" anyway so any woman shorter than 5'11" is feminine and submissive for my standards. But if you consider the average height of men from the whole world, a 5'9" woman is tall for them and they probably won't perceive her as feminine and submissive.
 
Do ethnics just have a lower incidence of widow's peak? I feel like you remove the widow's peak the forehead looks more ethnic
 
I never said her mandibular recession is ideal anyway, it should be a little protrusive. I was talking about her skull and how her large neurocranium size plays a huge role in making her look feminine.


There's a limit to bone structure show. Women can't have really protrusive, wide and large jaws. Women are supposed to have forward grown maxillas and protrusive cheekbones, but not hollow cheeks imo because that is PSL autism. Two much bone definition makes a foid look masculine. Neoteny is to be given more importance.


I've changed my opinion on height.
I'm 6'1.5" anyway so any woman shorter than 5'11" is feminine and submissive for my standards. But if you consider the average height of men from the whole world, a 5'9" woman is tall for them and they probably won't perceive her as feminine and submissive.
I never said her mandibular recession is ideal anyway, it should be a little protrusive. I was talking about her skull and how her large neurocranium size plays a huge role in making her look feminine.


There's a limit to bone structure show. Women can't have really protrusive, wide and large jaws. Women are supposed to have forward grown maxillas and protrusive cheekbones, but not hollow cheeks imo because that is PSL autism. Two much bone definition makes a foid look masculine. Neoteny is to be given more importance.


I've changed my opinion on height.
I'm 6'1.5" anyway so any woman shorter than 5'11" is feminine and submissive for my standards. But if you consider the average height of men from the whole world, a 5'9" woman is tall for them and they probably won't perceive her as feminine and submissive.
I never made a comment about the neurocranium. I already showed that she doesn't have a detrimentally masculine jaw by comparing her to her sister, who does.
 
I already showed that she doesn't have a detrimentally masculine jaw by comparing her to her sister, who does.
And then if I compare Taylor Hill's original face to the morph I made, she looks like a masculine ogre (only feature-wise) in comparison.
 
indians were meant to be moggers but got cucked by british and holy cow meme making us vegan. we were superior in ancient times
True. If Indians are red meat, they would have better skin and would be moggers.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15854
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15854
True. If Indians are red meat, they would have better skin and would be moggers.
we will rise again inshallah through I-POP
 
ALL THE NIGGERS IN THIS THREAD COPING
neil-de-grasse-tyson-when-the-coping-is-too-strong.gif


LITERALLY LOOKS UNATTRACTIVE BOTH IN THE BEFORE AND AFTER
Joe Biden Lol GIF


MUH I WOULD ONLY SMASH "THE BEFORE"
Goodfellas GIF


JFL AT YOUR GIGA LOW STANDARDS
Funny GIF


THEY ARE THE ONES, THE MOMENT THEY GET A CHANCE WITH THIS ULTRA SUBHUMAN "MODEL" (FUCKING CAGE AT THAT), WHO WOULD RUN TO HER LIKE THE SEX DEPRIVED INCELS THEY ARE
pexels-photo-235922.jpeg


ALL FOR THAT UTTER STINKY TERA SUBHUMAN "PUSSY"
depositphotos_54759905-stock-photo-man-holding-nose.jpg


"HER" IS A BOLD STATEMENT BTW, THIS BITCH COULD BE ON HRT FOR ALL EVERYONE KNOWS
SubQ-vs-IM-Injections-for-Testosterone.jpg

 
ALL THE NIGGERS IN THIS THREAD COPING
neil-de-grasse-tyson-when-the-coping-is-too-strong.gif


LITERALLY LOOKS UNATTRACTIVE BOTH IN THE BEFORE AND AFTER
Joe Biden Lol GIF


MUH I WOULD ONLY SMASH "THE BEFORE"
Goodfellas GIF


JFL AT YOUR GIGA LOW STANDARDS
Funny GIF


THEY ARE THE ONES, THE MOMENT THEY GET A CHANCE WITH THIS ULTRA SUBHUMAN "MODEL" (FUCKING CAGE AT THAT), WHO WOULD RUN TO HER LIKE THE SEX DEPRIVED INCELS THEY ARE
pexels-photo-235922.jpeg


ALL FOR THAT UTTER STINKY TERA SUBHUMAN "PUSSY"
depositphotos_54759905-stock-photo-man-holding-nose.jpg


"HER" IS A BOLD STATEMENT BTW, THIS BITCH COULD BE ON HRT FOR ALL EVERYONE KNOWS
SubQ-vs-IM-Injections-for-Testosterone.jpg
Nice shitpost. Her features look way better in the morph and you’re coping if you deny this.
 
Nice shitpost. Her features look way better in the morph and you’re coping if you deny this.
she looks better in the after obviously
im making fun of the incels who would rather sleep with the before, she looks like a hideous tranny
 
  • +1
Reactions: john2
she looks better in the after obviously
im making fun of the incels who would rather sleep with the before, she looks like a hideous tranny
If I lightened her skin in the the morphed pic in the OP, she would be a gigastacy then, right?
 
If I lightened her skin in the the morphed pic in the OP, she would be a gigastacy then, right?
no
"she looks better in the after" doesnt mean she's a good looking person, just looks better than "the before".
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: john2
no
"she looks better in the after" doesnt mean she's a good looking person, just looks better than "the before".
Then what do you think is failoing her from being a stacy other than her obvious dark skin?
 
She has an Indian accent to boot

 

Similar threads

A
Replies
2
Views
174
iblamemandible7
iblamemandible7
unspecified
Replies
46
Views
716
Va-qoh
Va-qoh
ltncurry
Replies
6
Views
2K
Swarthy Knight
Swarthy Knight
Lev_666
Replies
4
Views
488
IOS
IOS
afroheadluke
Replies
62
Views
1K
afroheadluke
afroheadluke

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top