john2
Gyneolatry Fiend
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2019
- Posts
- 18,467
- Reputation
- 31,307
She looks really hot in the morph imo. Not the ideal colouring though, but still an improvement, feature-wise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nah she still looks non-Indian without makeup. I made her look like a central-Indian in my morph.Taylor hill wo makeup is Indian tho
Correct. She looks so masculine in the original picture when compared to my morph.very hot.
yeah definitely ascended but the undertone is still better than most IndiansCorrect. She looks so masculine in the original picture when compared to my morph.
I think she ascended. Her facial features are clearly better now. Why exactly do you think she descended? Is it because of the coloring? I already stated that her coloring isn't ideal. But I'll try morphing her again with lighter skin, while still keeping the new feminine facial features I gave her.descended tho
Yes I agree. Most Indians have a yellowish brown undertone. Hers is red, which is pretty much globally considered more attractive.yeah definitely ascended but the undertone is still better than most Indians
I think she ascended. Her facial features are clearly better now. Why exactly do you think she descended? Is it because of the coloring? I already stated that her coloring isn't ideal. But I'll try morphing her again with lighter skin, while still keeping the new feminine facial features I gave her
Well same here boyo, despite being one. Women don't like deathnics either. I've been trying to get rid of the darkness on her orbitals/under her eyes, but I need a pro version of the app I am using to morph her.I don’t like deathnics
Yeah, feature wise she is purely Caucasoid now and I think if every ethnic had perfect Caucasoid facial features like her, then they would all be very good looking. If I didn't change her features, then she would look repulsive.but u completely changed her features too
I see it actuallylOoks indian in both
What features do you think I screwed up?You made her look worse, but not due to the coloring.
The smaller jaw, nose, and brows were not improvements.What features do you think I screwed up?
Damn looks sexierView attachment 2130113
View attachment 2130114
She looks really hot in the morph imo. Not the ideal colouring though, but still an improvement, feature-wise.
Are you into men or something? Women are supposed to have smaller noses, jaws and thinner eyebrows.The smaller jaw, nose, and brows were not improvements.
I remember already having this pointless argument with you. None of her features are masculine enough to the point of being detrimental. Her sister would be that example.Are you into men or something? Women are supposed to have smaller noses, jaws and thinner eyebrows.
Morph any female face with a taller jaw, thicker eyebrows and a bigger nose... the face will look like that of a man's at the end.
I never said her facial features are at a point where they are too masculine and make her look like a man. You still admit that her features are masculine (not necessarily extremely masculine), which is exactly what I am saying. Women need to be as feminine as possible to be closer to 8 PSL. This gif is self explanatory. Jaws need to be narrower on women and noses need to be tinier and skinnier on women.None of her features are masculine enough to the point of being detrimental.
Her skull doesn't look as impressive as other models'. Your morph has made that discrepancy even worse.I never said her facial features are at a point where they are too masculine and make her look like a man. You still admit that her features are masculine (not necessarily extremely masculine), which is exactly what I am saying. Women need to be as feminine as possible to be closer to 8 PSL. This gif is self explanatory. Jaws need to be narrower on women and noses need to be tinier and skinnier on women.
View attachment 2130178
Taylor's chin is clearly wide, which is a masculine facial feature.
The foid in the middle looks like a man, she has more of a warrior skull than an angelic skull. Lol if you think that is more impressive or closer to ideal... if anything, it is more masculine. Taylor's skull is the best looking, most feminine and most angelic looking skull among them. She looks so submissive and delicate, which is the ideal look on females. Her slight mandibular recession helps her achieve this submissive look.Her skull doesn't look as impressive as other models'. Your morph has made that discrepancy even worse.
Mandibular recession isn't beneficial for either sex. Neoteny is important for females, but so are developed, prominent bones. Next, you'll be saying that she isn't "submissive" enough due to being over 5'9.The foid in the middle looks like a man, she has more of a warrior skull than an angelic skull. Lol if you think that is more impressive or closer to ideal... if anything, it is more masculine. Taylor's skull is the best looking, most feminine and most angelic looking skull among them. She looks so submissive and delicate, which is the ideal look on females. Her slight mandibular recession helps her achieve this submissive look.
If you knew a thing or two about basic looks theory, you would know that large neurocraniums are a feminine trait... which is why men look so subhuman, vulnerable and weak with larger neurocraniums. I'm aware that in this picture, the full head of the model in the middle of the picture isn't visible, but I'm sure her neurocranium is either just as big or smaller, which is masculine. The same is with the foid on the very left, she looks less feminine than Taylor because of her neurocranium size.
Also, from the pic, you can clearly see that Taylor, like a normal female, has a rounded protrusive forehead unlike the two other 'female' models. I bet you think this also doesn't look 'impressive' because of your androgyny-centred idealisations of female aesthetics.
I never said her mandibular recession is ideal anyway, it should be a little protrusive. I was talking about her skull and how her large neurocranium size plays a huge role in making her look feminine.Mandibular recession isn't beneficial for either sex.
There's a limit to bone structure show. Women can't have really protrusive, wide and large jaws. Women are supposed to have forward grown maxillas and protrusive cheekbones, but not hollow cheeks imo because that is PSL autism. Two much bone definition makes a foid look masculine. Neoteny is to be given more importance.Neoteny is important for females, but so are developed, prominent bones.
I've changed my opinion on height.Next, you'll be saying that she isn't "submissive" enough due to being over 5'9.
I never said her mandibular recession is ideal anyway, it should be a little protrusive. I was talking about her skull and how her large neurocranium size plays a huge role in making her look feminine.
There's a limit to bone structure show. Women can't have really protrusive, wide and large jaws. Women are supposed to have forward grown maxillas and protrusive cheekbones, but not hollow cheeks imo because that is PSL autism. Two much bone definition makes a foid look masculine. Neoteny is to be given more importance.
I've changed my opinion on height.
I'm 6'1.5" anyway so any woman shorter than 5'11" is feminine and submissive for my standards. But if you consider the average height of men from the whole world, a 5'9" woman is tall for them and they probably won't perceive her as feminine and submissive.
I never made a comment about the neurocranium. I already showed that she doesn't have a detrimentally masculine jaw by comparing her to her sister, who does.I never said her mandibular recession is ideal anyway, it should be a little protrusive. I was talking about her skull and how her large neurocranium size plays a huge role in making her look feminine.
There's a limit to bone structure show. Women can't have really protrusive, wide and large jaws. Women are supposed to have forward grown maxillas and protrusive cheekbones, but not hollow cheeks imo because that is PSL autism. Two much bone definition makes a foid look masculine. Neoteny is to be given more importance.
I've changed my opinion on height.
I'm 6'1.5" anyway so any woman shorter than 5'11" is feminine and submissive for my standards. But if you consider the average height of men from the whole world, a 5'9" woman is tall for them and they probably won't perceive her as feminine and submissive.
Taylor hill wo makeup is Indian tho
And then if I compare Taylor Hill's original face to the morph I made, she looks like a masculine ogre (only feature-wise) in comparison.I already showed that she doesn't have a detrimentally masculine jaw by comparing her to her sister, who does.
indians were meant to be moggers but got cucked by british and holy cow meme making us vegan. we were superior in ancient timesView attachment 2130113
View attachment 2130114
She looks really hot in the morph imo. Not the ideal colouring though, but still an improvement, feature-wise.
jfl whatcentral-Indian
True. If Indians are red meat, they would have better skin and would be moggers.indians were meant to be moggers but got cucked by british and holy cow meme making us vegan. we were superior in ancient times
*ateTrue. If Indians are red meat, they would have better skin and would be moggers.
we will rise again inshallah through I-POPTrue. If Indians are red meat, they would have better skin and would be moggers.
Nice shitpost. Her features look way better in the morph and you’re coping if you deny this.ALL THE NIGGERS IN THIS THREAD COPING
LITERALLY LOOKS UNATTRACTIVE BOTH IN THE BEFORE AND AFTER
MUH I WOULD ONLY SMASH "THE BEFORE"
JFL AT YOUR GIGA LOW STANDARDS
THEY ARE THE ONES, THE MOMENT THEY GET A CHANCE WITH THIS ULTRA SUBHUMAN "MODEL" (FUCKING CAGE AT THAT), WHO WOULD RUN TO HER LIKE THE SEX DEPRIVED INCELS THEY ARE
ALL FOR THAT UTTER STINKY TERA SUBHUMAN "PUSSY"
"HER" IS A BOLD STATEMENT BTW, THIS BITCH COULD BE ON HRT FOR ALL EVERYONE KNOWS
she looks better in the after obviouslyNice shitpost. Her features look way better in the morph and you’re coping if you deny this.
If I lightened her skin in the the morphed pic in the OP, she would be a gigastacy then, right?she looks better in the after obviously
im making fun of the incels who would rather sleep with the before, she looks like a hideous tranny
noIf I lightened her skin in the the morphed pic in the OP, she would be a gigastacy then, right?
Then what do you think is failoing her from being a stacy other than her obvious dark skin?no
"she looks better in the after" doesnt mean she's a good looking person, just looks better than "the before".
Her face is uglyThen what do you think is failoing her from being a stacy other than her obvious dark skin?
Then what features does she need to be good looking?Her face is ugly