![RichmondBread](/data/avatars/l/4/4042.jpg?1715756745)
RichmondBread
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
- Posts
- 5,111
- Reputation
- 7,699
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My Great-Granddaddy was considered very handsome in his day, but I bet on this site he'll get a 4 at best, lol.
He looks very noble. Nordid with some Atlantid influence.My Great-Granddaddy was considered very handsome in his day, but I bet on this site he'll get a 4 at best, lol.
He looks very noble. Nordid with some Atlantid influence.
I assume some British forefathers?
Decent jaw and chin, symmetric face. Probably was quite tall too.
What was his profession if i may ask?
What year were these pics taken
bro dont do op like that.Looks good and clasically handsome
I can't believe you are his descendant LOL
Mogs everyone in this site.Mogs me
No man, on this site he won't get a 4. He's very handsome, a Chad.My Great-Granddaddy was considered very handsome in his day, but I bet on this site he'll get a 4 at best, lol.
easily a chad. His blue eyes are what makes him very good looking though.My Great-Granddaddy was considered very handsome in his day, but I bet on this site he'll get a 4 at best, lol.
Chad granddadMy Great-Granddaddy was considered very handsome in his day, but I bet on this site he'll get a 4 at best, lol.
So not a suprise. As I assumed. Higher class with a probably WASP-english origins. Typical English higher-class nordid gentelmen face. USA used to be delightful before mass immigatrion, fiat money, and cultural revolution.He was an engineer. He was from the oldest of Virginia families.
No man, on this site he won't get a 4. He's very handsome, a Chad.
Even when used harsh PSL type of rating systems, like this one:
I would still give him 8 on that scale (aka 1/100)
Now on this site, there is harshness for normies, in rating. But not for Chads.
Because nromies (myself included) often delude themselfes, that we are like a 6.5/10.Like we are average. But that is like 4 psl. And if a dude is someone that gets considered in general a 5, then on psl he's like a 3 orso.
You grandfather took great care in his looks, it seems. Even though grooming products were much less back then, and more expensive comparative. Plus he didn't walk around with 25% bodyfat.
As far as his efforts on looks go, it would a person for you to take example in. He had great skin, great style, great grooming and maybe like max 15% bodyfat.
easily a chad. His blue eyes are what makes him very good looking though.
dang looks like a long midface or high fwhr but at the same time a tall mandible, did he have a tall rami?
any other pictures of his 3/4 or side?
Looks good and clasically handsome
I can't believe you are his descendant LOL
Lived and died a Chad life, he must have had better experiences then the majority of people out there with dopamine rushes 24/7.Well, golly, thanks a lot for that. He's dead and rotting in the ground now. So he... I look better than he does now! He also cheated on my great grandmother and he went broke with bad investments. At least I have better character than he does.
Lived and died a Chad life, he must have had better experiences then the majority of people out there with dopamine rushes 24/7.
4.5 maybe 5.5 if they had invented finasteride 100 years ago and he lifted
Probably should add I accounted for the time period
No man, on this site he won't get a 4. He's very handsome, a Chad.
Even when used harsh PSL type of rating systems, like this one:
I would still give him 8 on that scale (aka 1/100)
Now on this site, there is harshness for normies, in rating. But not for Chads.
Because nromies (myself included) often delude themselfes, that we are like a 6.5/10.Like we are average. But that is like 4 psl. And if a dude is someone that gets considered in general a 5, then on psl he's like a 3 orso.
You grandfather took great care in his looks, it seems. Even though grooming products were much less back then, and more expensive comparative. Plus he didn't walk around with 25% bodyfat.
As far as his efforts on looks go, it would a person for you to take example in. He had great skin, great style, great grooming and maybe like max 15% bodyfat.
That is a terrible rating scale tbh, by this metric im between an 8 - 8.5 and that's nowhere near the truth, the differences are very minute as you scale from bottom to top. Really I rate PSL as
1-3 Ugly over/truecell 3-4 Ugly low tier normiw 4-5 Normie/high tier normie 5-6 Hightier normie/chadlite 6-7 Chadlight/chad 7+Chad and anyhting more is just subjective attraction from who is looking at them.
Having seen your entire family tree here are the ratings adjusted for the time period.I am a 4, definitely. No lower. I can become a 6 if I lose weight. That will take time and I know I won't be as "pristine" as I would be if I were 22 years old, but I am happy with whatever I can manage.
I see a trend in the familyThe guy on the right at 5.5 for example shouldn't be over a 4
Having seen your entire family tree here are the ratings adjusted for the time period.
GGF 4.5-5 max
Father 3-3.5 Max
You 3.5 now Prime 4
Deal with it
No man, on this site he won't get a 4. He's very handsome, a Chad.
Even when used harsh PSL type of rating systems, like this one:
I would still give him 8 on that scale (aka 1/100)
Now on this site, there is harshness for normies, in rating. But not for Chads.
Because nromies (myself included) often delude themselfes, that we are like a 6.5/10.Like we are average. But that is like 4 psl. And if a dude is someone that gets considered in general a 5, then on psl he's like a 3 orso.
You grandfather took great care in his looks, it seems. Even though grooming products were much less back then, and more expensive comparative. Plus he didn't walk around with 25% bodyfat.
As far as his efforts on looks go, it would a person for you to take example in. He had great skin, great style, great grooming and maybe like max 15% bodyfat.
The guy on the right at 5.5 for example shouldn't be over a 4
Having seen your entire family tree here are the ratings adjusted for the time period.
GGF 4.5-5 max
Father 3-3.5 Max
You 3.5 now Prime 4
Deal with it
I see a trend in the family
Even by the Scale the poster provided, do you feel you are now more attractive than michael cera?
lol
The guy on the right at 5.5 for example shouldn't be over a 4
Having seen your entire family tree here are the ratings adjusted for the time period.
GGF 4.5-5 max
Father 3-3.5 Max
You 3.5 now Prime 4
Deal with it
I see a trend in the family
Even by the Scale the poster provided, do you feel you are now more attractive than michael cera?
lol
How and when was picture in OP colorized?
This scale, they use at the subreddit.: TrueratemeThat is a terrible rating scale tbh, by this metric im between an 8 - 8.5 and that's nowhere near the truth, the differences are very minute as you scale from bottom to top.
Without pictures, I always a bit difficult time. And people have more of a tendency to rate "all over" a scale, when it doesn't have pictures/examples.Really I rate PSL as
1-3 Ugly over/truecell 3-4 Ugly low tier normiw 4-5 Normie/high tier normie 5-6 Hightier normie/chadlite 6-7 Chadlight/chad 7+Chad and anyhting more is just subjective attraction from who is looking at them.
there are a few but I thought the ratings were simply a depiction of ones looks interact with their environments. like you can look at a guy and tell he is subhuman and what that entails. I guess it's relevant when someone does not know what makes someone good looking I guess.This scale, they use at the subreddit.: Truerateme
Without pictures, I always a bit difficult time. And people have more of a tendency to rate "all over" a scale, when it doesn't have pictures/examples.
Unfortunately I haven't found a PSL scale with example pictures.
You also see it here.
People rate all over the place on a person here, with using PSL scale.
Whereas at that subreddit Truerateme, they all rate a person much more within a small margin of difference.
The cause that PSL rating is all over the place, because we have no example references.
Is there a PSL scale with pictures?
Maybe someone or I should try to make one.
Quite good looking ngl
Only flaws I can see immediately are long midface and thin hair
Virtually everyone's hair thins as they older, I guarantee his was thicker as a young man.Fine hair, but not thinning. He had a full head of hair til his dying day
Virtually everyone's hair thins as they older, I guarantee his was thicker as a young man.
How old is he in the photos?He is a young man in the photos, and some people have finer hair than others.
How old is he in the photos?
I've never seen. Maybe you have? Or a link?there are a few
I agree. That's easy to see if someone is ugly, and it's we easy to see of someone is attractive. Like, easy to see someone is obviously subhuman or Chad.like you can look at a guy and tell he is subhuman and what that entails. I guess it's relevant when someone does not know what makes someone good looking I guess.
I've never seen. Maybe you have? Or a link?
I agree. That's easy to see if someone is ugly, and it's we easy to see of someone is attractive. Like, easy to see someone is obviously subhuman or Chad.
It's the normie-average range, type of men, where it gets difficult often. And people go all over the place in their rating, iften. One calling a dude a low tier normie subhuman 4 and another calling him an above average normie of 6.5
Guarantee at that point his hair had thinned since optimal density as a true youth.About 30 in the first one and mid 20s in the color.
Guarantee at that point his hair had thinned since optimal density as a true youth.
And no, it didn't.30 is a young man.
This is why I don't bother rating anyone above a 7 even if someone who was in that range made a post, after 7 you shouldn't have any issues unless you are looking for modelling gigs or something and then it's more about hairstyles, grooming, height and body critic tbh.I've never seen. Maybe you have? Or a link?
I agree. That's easy to see if someone is ugly, and it's we easy to see of someone is attractive. Like, easy to see someone is obviously subhuman or Chad.
It's the normie-average range, type of men, where it gets difficult often. And people go all over the place in their rating, iften. One calling a dude a low tier normie subhuman 4 and another calling him an above average normie of 6.5
By "true youth" I mean someone who usually hasn't had time to experience the full effects of post-puberty, someone who is a teenager or below. And yeah, I would bet it had. No way his hair was always that thin.30 is a young man.
And no, it didn't.