Rate The Beatles

[forthlord]

I've seen a couple of these, but they always seem to use the shittiest pictures of them
Obviously their perceived attractiveness was ridiculously inflated by their fame, but I've seen people that claim they would be incel if in 2019/not famous. Imo they're all at least average/slightly below average in today's standards (except Ringo obviously)

John

Paul

George

Ringo

 

[OldRooster]

This is a good side by side to access height. Ringo is about 3" shorter than John, Paul and George. A lot of BS on the interweb as to their absolute heights, my best guess is John, Paul and George were really 5'10" in their 20s.

Ringo was decent looking with a beard, but was a serious manlet, puzzling how he accomplished a short movie career. John and George looked good young, but did not age well. Paul aged much better than the other 3. When young (1964) John, Paul and George were all about 85th percentile, Ringo 35th percentile. Around 1970, John was 90th percentile, Paul and George 60th percentile.