Rate the young imran khan

[Deleted member 6111]

Hes actually less good looking than i thought hed be when i decided to make this ngl

 

[HellenicChad]

He has weird hair, average jaw, no zygos but still mogs because of god-tier eye area. Eye area > all

 

[Deleted member 756]

He has weird hair, average jaw, no zygos but still mogs because of god-tier eye area. Eye area > all

Ngl he looks greek or Sicilian more than pakistani

 

[HellenicChad]

Ngl he looks greek or Sicilian more than pakistani

true, he reminds me of this Greek actor. What's this eye area type called? You just can' lose with it regardless of body fat, bones, hair etc

 

[Deleted member 756]

true, he reminds me of this Greek actor. What's this eye area type called? You just can' lose with it regardless of body fat, bones, hair etc

View attachment 854859

hunter

 

[HellenicChad]

hunter

Hunter eyes or death, no other feature has so much endurance even after the agepill, fatpill, heightpill etc. There's no surgery for it, is there?

 

[Deleted member 6111]

He has weird hair, average jaw, no zygos but still mogs because of god-tier eye area. Eye area > all

His eye shape is very good but eyebrows and colour are lacking.

i agree he benefits a lot from pheno but i think hes also massively haloed by the whole "exotic intellectual" shtick and the kind of glamorous, mysterious duality of being both an oxford ppe grad and a world class sportsmen, a pakistani politician/statesman and a formerly hedonistic playboy

 

[Deleted member 5052]

Tall midface with hunter eyes gives high class masculine look

 

[Deleted member 6111]

Tall midface with hunter eyes gives high class masculine look

is tall midface just a cope way of saying long midface?

(i also have a long midface)

 

[Deleted member 5052]

is tall midface just a cope way of saying long midface?

(i also have a long midface)

Yeah i should've actually said long midface. Tall midface doesn't sound right lol

 

[reptiles]

Hes actually less good looking than i thought hed be when i decided to make this ngl

Greek chad ngl

 

[reptiles]

Ngl he looks greek or Sicilian more than pakistani

Hes pashtun meaning he has no nigger blood and i think pashtuns are closer to iranians hence why they look greekish this is why i said pakistan is the future of south asia it is removing its nigger blood 1 block at a time

 

[JizzFarmer]

Hes pashtun meaning he has no nigger blood and i think pashtuns are closer to iranians hence why they look greekish this is why i said pakistan is the future of south asia it is removing its nigger blood 1 block at a time

He is half Punjabi

 

[Deleted member 6111]

Hes pashtun meaning he has no nigger blood and i think pashtuns are closer to iranians hence why they look greekish this is why i said pakistan is the future of south asia it is removing its nigger blood 1 block at a time

Pashtuns are ethnically “Iranian”

He is half Punjabi

Source? As far as I’m aware both his parents are from Pashtun tribes settled in Punjab

 

[Deleted member 756]

Hes pashtun meaning he has no nigger blood and i think pashtuns are closer to iranians hence why they look greekish this is why i said pakistan is the future of south asia it is removing its nigger blood 1 block at a time

there are no blacks in South Asia

 

[Deleted member 8583]

there are no blacks in South Asia

where do you think dravidian bulls came from

 

[reptiles]

Pashtuns are ethnically “Iranian”
Source? As far as I’m aware both his parents are from Pashtun tribes settled in Punjab

I am aware hes pashtun however the ethnic groups beside him are also very common in pakistan also even the punjabis have near nigger 0 nigger blood but there very dark skinned my point is paksitan is the future for well all west eurasian of south asia

 

[reptiles]

He is half Punjabi

Punjabis are mostly caucasian

 

[Deleted member 6111]

I am aware hes pashtun however the ethnic groups beside him are also very common in pakistan also even the punjabis have near nigger 0 nigger blood but there very dark skinned my point is paksitan is the future for well all west eurasian of south asia

if you mean dravidian just say dravidian. why be vulgar AND misleading

 

[reptiles]

if you mean dravidian just say dravidian. why be vulgar AND misleading

Dravdians were Caucasian in fact i would go as far as to say the peoples of the indus valley neolethic iranians were closest to modern day iranians, That being said modern day dravdians area mixture of Abo,WHG,Neolethic iran it's the ABO that causes the subhumanity really never the less most punjabis are dark skinned caucasians

 

[Deleted member 6111]

Dravdians were Caucasian in fact i would go as far as to say the peoples of the indus valley neolethic iranians were closest to modern day iranians, That being said modern day dravdians area mixture of Abo,WHG,Neolethic iran it's the ABO that causes the subhumanity really never the less most punjabis are dark skinned caucasians

source? I know the dravidians came via iran, but idk if that makes them caucasian, especially considering it was before the IE migrations, but is there actual evidence modern dravidians are actually partially aborigine? isnt it just that aborigines are also at least partially descended from SAHG?

also the dravidians ancestors by definition werent WHG, theyre SAHG. unless you think whg literally migrated from europe to south asia?

 

[reptiles]

source? I know the dravidians came via iran, but idk if that makes them caucasian, especially considering it was before the IE migrations, but is there actual evidence modern dravidians are actually partially aborigine? isnt it just that aborigines are also at least partially descended from SAHG?

also the dravidians ancestors by definition werent WHG, theyre SAHG. unless you think whg literally migrated from europe to south asia?

>>source? I know the dravidians came via iran, but idk if that makes them caucasian, especially considering it was before the IE migrations, but is there actual evidence modern dravidians are actually partially aborigine? isnt it just that aborigines are also at least partially descended from SAHG?>>

Caucasian just means west Eurasian anyways the IVC people before mixing with SAHG were primarily neolethic iranians at around 87 percent that is more than enough though to claim they are west eurasian. Also note the Indo european invasion itself isn't the sole thing that is caucasian in Indians.

Were Indus Valley people Proto-Australoids in appearance?

Answer (1 of 4): No, they were most similar to modern Pakistanis/Indians and Iranians of this region. → They were/are Caucasoid (West-Eurasian). Possibly proto-Dravidian and also related to the ancient Elamites in southern Iran. The Indus Valley population was genetically similar to ancient Iran...

www.quora.com

>>also the dravidians ancestors by definition werent WHG, theyre SAHG. unless you think whg literally migrated from europe to south asia?>>


THe original dravdians aren't but modern dravidans due to mixing with Post proto Indo european steppe herder have WHG ancestry the original dravdians were just iran neolethic which isn't WHG it's more well iranian related or elamite related.

Remeber ANI was around half WHG and around HALF Iran neolethic.

Modern dravdians aren't caucasian though due to mixing with the tribals in the south the originals were very west eurasian

 

[Deleted member 6111]

>>source? I know the dravidians came via iran, but idk if that makes them caucasian, especially considering it was before the IE migrations, but is there actual evidence modern dravidians are actually partially aborigine? isnt it just that aborigines are also at least partially descended from SAHG?>>

Caucasian just means west Eurasian anyways the IVC people before mixing with SAHG were primarily neolethic iranians at around 87 percent that is more than enough though to claim they are west eurasian. Also note the Indo european invasion itself isn't the sole thing that is caucasian in Indians.

Were Indus Valley people Proto-Australoids in appearance?

Answer (1 of 4): No, they were most similar to modern Pakistanis/Indians and Iranians of this region. → They were/are Caucasoid (West-Eurasian). Possibly proto-Dravidian and also related to the ancient Elamites in southern Iran. The Indus Valley population was genetically similar to ancient Iran...

www.quora.com

>>also the dravidians ancestors by definition werent WHG, theyre SAHG. unless you think whg literally migrated from europe to south asia?>>


THe original dravdians aren't but modern dravidans due to mixing with Post proto Indo european steppe herder have WHG ancestry the original dravdians were just iran neolethic which isn't WHG it's more well iranian related or elamite related.

Remeber ANI was around half WHG and around HALF Iran neolethic.

Modern dravdians aren't caucasian though due to mixing with the tribals in the south the originals were very west eurasian

if youre going to say caucasian is west eurasian then sure.

WHG is totally separate from IE though? IE largely displaced/mixed with WHG when they got to central and western europe, they didnt descend from them.

 

[reptiles]

if youre going to say caucasian is west eurasian then sure.

WHG is totally separate from IE though? IE largely displaced/mixed with WHG when they got to central and western europe, they didnt descend from them.

>>if youre going to say caucasian is west eurasian then sure.<<

I'm not saying anything anthropologists are the ones saying Caucasian refers to western Eurasian.



>>WHG is totally separate from IE though? IE largely displaced/mixed with WHG when they got to central and western europe, they didnt descend from them.<<

I don't know what would you classify steppe emba ? i thought it was a proto europoid component even craniometrically it looks very similar to the tarim basin mummies found in the ughyur people.

It's yamnaya dna does that count as WHG ?

 

[Deleted member 6111]

>>if youre going to say caucasian is west eurasian then sure.<<

I'm not saying anything anthropologists are the ones saying Caucasian refers to western Eurasian.



>>WHG is totally separate from IE though? IE largely displaced/mixed with WHG when they got to central and western europe, they didnt descend from them.<<

I don't know what would you classify steppe emba ? i thought it was a proto europoid component even craniometrically it looks very similar to the tarim basin mummies found in the ughyur people.

It's yamnaya dna does that count as WHG ?

Its a matter of terminology, im not disputing what youre saying.

yeah yamnaya were proto indo european and ancestors of modern euros but they werent WHG. WHG is like cheddar man. when the Indo Europeans ie the Yamnaya and their relatives/descendants migrated into Europe they mixed with and for the most part displaced WHG in western central and southern europe and Eastern Hunter Gatherers in eastern europe. this happened after they got to europe though so the IE who went to India via central asia and Iran wouldnt have mixed with WHG.

Modern euros in different countries are for the most part various percentage mixtures of WHG, Yamnaya/IE and Neolithic farmers, in the same way that I presume Indians/south asians are various mixtures of SAHG, Yamnaya/IE and Iranian (dravidian) neolithic farmers. like theyre all descended from the same people but one group or other's dna will be more prevalent depending on where you are?

 

[reptiles]

Its a matter of terminology, im not disputing what youre saying.

yeah yamnaya were proto indo european and ancestors of modern euros but they werent WHG. WHG is like cheddar man. when the Indo Europeans ie the Yamnaya and their relatives/descendants migrated into Europe they mixed with and for the most part displaced WHG in western central and southern europe and Eastern Hunter Gatherers in eastern europe. this happened after they got to europe though so the IE who went to India via central asia and Iran wouldnt have mixed with WHG.

Modern euros in different countries are for the most part various percentage mixtures of WHG, Yamnaya/IE and Neolithic farmers, in the same way that I presume Indians/south asians are various mixtures of SAHG, Yamnaya/IE and Iranian (dravidian) neolithic farmers. like theyre all descended from the same people but one group or other's dna will be more prevalent depending on where you are?

Yrah except my point is for the longest indians were full on caucasians its the mixing with the dysgenic SAHG that destroyed most indians the south is 60 percent ani but 40 percent negro.


Pakistan has near 0 of that abo blood hence why i said they were the future of south asia south asia while predominantly of caucasian stock have mixex heavily with the tribals hence they can have nigger phenotypes.

 

[Gengar]

mongolian rape baby eyes/10

 

[Gengar]

there are no blacks in South Asia

bro actually we do. they are called siddis. they're pakistanis with west african heritage

 

[Deleted member 3679]

Looks like a taller Joaquim de Almeida

 

[Deleted member 20452]

@Thompsonz thoughts?