Rate this couple

Deleted member 616

Deleted member 616

BeChadOrDieTryin'
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Posts
16,295
Reputation
22,635
6D46780D 9D51 4494 8C12 630266AB1C9A
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 71 and SLA
High tier normies
 
Guy is like 4/10 and girl like 6/10
 
5/10 male - he is bloated, with beta upper eyelid exposure but has ok orbitals underneath is buccal fat and a good nose shape. However, his IPD is slightly too short
5.25/10 female - Her bloat doesnt dmg her looks. She has average orbits, zygos. Her IPD is fine. However, she has a slightly bulbous nose. Her IPD is fine.
Both have minimal nasolabial folds, no malocclusion and okay palates. both have ok, neutral canthal tilt, good nose shape and alar width. Both have very good soft tissue. both have a high iq, high class forehead with ok hairline. both have high collagen. They are a looks match.
Currently she slightly mogs him. However, if he loses weight he will mog her.
5/10 male - he is bloated, with beta upper eyelid exposure but has ok orbitals underneath is buccal fat and a good nose shape. However, his IPD is slightly too short
5.25/10 female - Her bloat doesnt dmg her looks. She has average orbits, zygos. Her IPD is fine. However, she has a slightly bulbous nose. Her IPD is fine.
Both have minimal nasolabial folds, no malocclusion and okay palates. both have ok, neutral canthal tilt, good nose shape and alar width. Both have very good soft tissue. both have a high iq, high class forehead with ok hairline. both have high collagen. They are a looks match.
Currently she slightly mogs him. However, if he loses weight he will mog her.
Also, worth adding that they are an above average couple. Average couple is actually 4/10 psl. They are very good looking couple for normies.
5/10 psl standards. 8/10 normie standards.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 616
recessed maxillas and poor malar fat distribution on both

probably 4-5 range

good phenotype and health indicators save them
 
Looksmatched and likely happy together

:feelsbadman:
 
jfl there maxillary is not noticeable.
when i think of maxillary retrusion i think of
Ttfpu.jpg

thats just the lower part of the bone being malformed there its more of a birth defect

what youre seeing in folks like this, and a lot of ugly people, is a general lack of forward growth due to a moderate recession of the entire maxillary structure.
thats just the lower part of the bone being malformed there its more of a birth defect

what youre seeing in folks like this, and a lot of ugly people, is a general lack of forward growth due to a moderate recession of the entire maxillary structure.
 
thats just the lower part of the bone being malformed there its more of a birth defect

what youre seeing in folks like this, and a lot of ugly people, is a general lack of forward growth due to a moderate recession of the entire maxillary structure.
jfl no maxillofacial surgeon would say that their faces are suffering from any noticeable degree of retrusion. sure there mandible or maxilla may not be as protruding as o' pry or palvin but this is not 'maxillary retrusion'.
 
jfl no maxillofacial surgeon would say that their faces are suffering from any noticeable degree of retrusion. sure there mandible or maxilla may not be as protruding as o' pry or palvin but this is not 'maxillary retrusion'.
right because they cant preform a lefort 3 to adjust the entire midface all they can do is move the aveolar process area forward

the source of them not being good looking comes down to bone, maxilla makes up the majority of the human face.
 
right because they cant preform a lefort 3 to adjust the entire midface all they can do is move the aveolar process area forward

the source of them not being good looking comes down to bone, maxilla makes up the majority of the human face.
imo their main issue is not to do with their alveolar process. this is too low. their main issue is to do with their infraorbitals and zygomatic process. their orbital surface and groove is shallow and not projecting. I think their upper mid face is the issue not their lower mid face.


retruded-maxilla-250x250.jpg
 
imo their main issue is not to do with their alveolar process. this is too low. their main issue is to do with their infraorbitals and zygomatic process. their orbital surface and groove is shallow and not projecting. I think their upper mid face is the issue not their lower mid face.


retruded-maxilla-250x250.jpg
Yes thats all accurate usually it’s the upper and center midface that is the problem which is unfortunate because only the lower is easily fixable. That is the black pill on surgery. You can do all sorts of things to mask an ugly face but you can’t fix it unless it’s a easy chin or rhino type issue. A recessed upper maxilla is a death sentence for aesthetics
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: sub6manletnozygos
Yes thats all accurate usually it’s the upper and center midface that is the problem which is unfortunate because only the lower is easily fixable. That is the black pill on surgery. You can do all sorts of things to mask an ugly face but you can’t fix it unless it’s a easy chin or rhino type issue. A recessed upper maxilla is a death sentence for aesthetics
legit
 
  • +1
Reactions: MicroPenis

Similar threads

Chadeep
Replies
6
Views
120
Bruce Wayne78
Bruce Wayne78
G
Replies
0
Views
54
gigatruecel
G
greeny05
Replies
5
Views
164
LTNUser
LTNUser
J
Replies
2
Views
86
FutureER
FutureER
K
OP Rate
Replies
9
Views
176
zerotohero
zerotohero

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top