![randomvanish](/data/avatars/l/5/5897.jpg?1690909486)
randomvanish
České srdce, otevřené všem!
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2020
- Posts
- 13,119
- Reputation
- 16,810
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why comical?Ascended but comical none the less
Are you blind?Why comical?
He needed CCWR and bimax Jfl every time with one of these retardsWow holy fuck this is awful.
His Gonial Angle is still 128.9 deg.
He needs that to be 110 - 122.
He must feel like shit.
The chin looks goodAre you blind?
Nigga the shit clearly looks artificial muh ramus it’s what happens u slap a giant piece of silicone on someone who got bullied their entire lifeThe chin looks good
Is it because the Ramus is too short?
Yea his mandible is still recessed.He needed CCWR and bimax Jfl every time with one of these retards
A money hungry jew is who did itImagine this exact implant on a non-recessed person? Holy shit would be a Chad jawline. Who did the surgery?
anyone do the jaw implants in Europe?
This bro, it’s always the fucking recessed dogs every time who look like absolute jokesYea his mandible is still recessed.
This is how people enter uncanny valley, not by "omg hes full of plastic"
Just by being unknowledgible about surgery.
No the chin and gonial angle are really bad.The chin looks good
Is it because the Ramus is too short?
not Eppley, a european surgeonA money hungry jew is who did it
you miscalculate the gonial angleNo the chin and gonial angle are really bad.
And he's still recessed.
Overall, take this dumbass as an example on what happens when you don't research.
Not all Jew surgeons are Eppleynot Eppley, a european surgeon
You're Right.you miscalculate the gonial angle
His gonial angle looks good in the after.You're Right.
It's 127 deg.
Extremely off the Ideal, and why me and every user here has shit on these results.
It's Awful.
His gonial angle looks good in the after.
miscalculation again. go along with ramus not to the earView attachment 1552639View attachment 1552640
It's actually remained roughly the same.
It's just more prominent of a jaw now.
That is on the ramus.miscalculation again. go along with ramus not to the ear
it's not 127 angle, that's what i'm saying. you must be blind to think this is high angle resultThat is on the ramus.
This is a botched result dude. No question.
Whatever you say man.it's not 27 angle, that's what i'm saying. you must be blind to think this is high angle result
you are fucking delusional get lostWhatever you say man.
Whatever you say man.you are fucking delusional get lost
Not the same angle. You can't be that dense lmfao.View attachment 1552639View attachment 1552640
It's actually remained roughly the same.
It's just more prominent of a jaw now.
"roughly the same" JFLNot the same angle. You can't be that dense lmfao.
It's not the same angle, that's what I said.Not the same angle. You can't be that dense lmfao.
Yea, I'd be sure to make sure you aren't recessed before surgery so you don't come out like this."roughly the same" JFL
imaging this guy designing your implant
![]()
"Roughly the same". It's drastically different.It's not the same angle, that's what I said.
Just tell someone to spend 2 years of their life getting braces and brutal jaw-sawing surgery at the end theory. You're acting as if bimax is a routine cosmetic procedure. It's a 2 year process + long recovery. Surgeons would rather just get a fat paycheck than to tell 90% of their prospective patients they need bimax (jaw width and forward growth are heavily correlated).Yea, I'd be sure to make sure you aren't recessed before surgery so you don't come out like this.
We'll which one is better advice for the patient?Just tell someone to spend 2 years of their life getting braces and brutal jaw-sawing surgery at the end theory. You're acting as if bimax is a routine cosmetic procedure. It's a 2 year process + long recovery. Surgeons would rather just get a fat paycheck than to tell 90% of their prospective patients they need bimax (jaw width and forward growth are heavily correlated).
stop miscalculating one of the easiest measurement on the face firstWe'll which one is better advice for the patient?
Measured it for the past 2min.stop miscalculating one of the easiest measurement on the face first
Shitty fucking surgeonsJust tell someone to spend 2 years of their life getting braces and brutal jaw-sawing surgery at the end theory. You're acting as if bimax is a routine cosmetic procedure. It's a 2 year process + long recovery. Surgeons would rather just get a fat paycheck than to tell 90% of their prospective patients they need bimax (jaw width and forward growth are heavily correlated).
Measured it for the past 2min.
Haven't measured an angle under 123.
So his gonial angle is probably like 123.9 - 125.9.
Happy now? Hope this helps you sleep tonight.
I don't know that they want me to say bro.
it's 119 degreeMeasured it for the past 2min.
Haven't measured an angle under 123.
So his gonial angle is probably like 123.9 - 125.9.
Happy now? Hope this helps you sleep tonight.
I calmly disagree.it's 119 degree
I calmly disagree.
Can you post your measurement?
Nice.
Nice.
This is still a bit off since the gonial angle line doesn't ride along the chin.
His gonial angle is NOT below 120.
I'd agree with 120 exactly before 118.