kranerman23123
Luminary
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2022
- Posts
- 5,763
- Reputation
- 6,299
They faceapped this guy to make him more attractive as a martyr and because they knew more liberal 30 yr old would throw a fit about him. He is objectively more attractive in the edited photo and the reality is that while he has bad features, most women in his age range would consider him to be above average.
On here? Both images would get rated exactly the same, and both would get rated as ugly and below average and as incels. But in reality older women WOULD simp over the second image and cheat on the first image with the second, you kids don't know how to actually rate faces, you just see oogee curve and typical preppy faces and think those are the only phenotypes that are attractive. You're wrong, it's much more nuanced, ratios matter more than features, and this guy in the second image probably mogs you.
On here? Both images would get rated exactly the same, and both would get rated as ugly and below average and as incels. But in reality older women WOULD simp over the second image and cheat on the first image with the second, you kids don't know how to actually rate faces, you just see oogee curve and typical preppy faces and think those are the only phenotypes that are attractive. You're wrong, it's much more nuanced, ratios matter more than features, and this guy in the second image probably mogs you.
