Raw food Vs Cooked

IWANTTOHELPEVERYONE

IWANTTOHELPEVERYONE

𝓓𝓶 𝓶𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓷𝔂 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷
Joined
Jul 27, 2025
Posts
48
Reputation
23
Let me summarize the differences between raw and cooked foods for you. I hope you’ll enjoy it, guys and at the end, let me know how you usually eat them(y)
Swedish Chef Cooking GIF



Vitamin differences:
Raw milk retains 5–10% more B2 and B12 than pasteurized milk
Raw meat has 10–40% more B vitamins (especially B6, B12, folate) than cooked meat
Raw liver contains 15–30% more B12 and folate than cooked liver
Vitamin A (in liver) is heat stable loss during cooking is minimal (10–15%)
Vitamin C present in low amounts, decreases by 10–30% with heat

Protein differences:
Cooking concentrates protein due to water loss
Raw meat and liver: 20 g protein per 100 g
Cooked meat and liver: 25–30 g protein per 100 g
Milk: protein remains unchanged (3.4 g/100 ml), raw or pasteurized

Fat differences:
Fat content is mostly stable during cooking
Some fat may melt/drip out in cooked meat/liver, slightly reducing total fat
Raw and pasteurized milk both contain 3.6 g fat per 100 ml

Mineral differences:
Minerals (iron, zinc, calcium, copper) are heat stable nearly no loss
Iron in liver: 6,7 mg/100 g, same raw or cooked
Calcium in milk: 115 120 mg/100 ml, unchanged by pasteurizatio

Enzyme differences:
Raw milk contains enzymes deactivated by pasteurization
These enzymes have negligible nutritional value
No critical enzyme difference in meat or liver

Raw versions contain slightly more heat sensitive vitamins, but differences are small (mostly 10–30%)
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: itsallgenesbtw, KYS RETARD COPERS and otterhaspants
You get way more raw than cooked + raw liver tastes way better then cooked liver i can eat raw liver easily but cooked liver makes me puke. Drinking milk always gave me diarhea or severe acne but raw milk is fine for me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: vincentzygo
You get way more raw than cooked + raw liver tastes way better then cooked liver i can eat raw liver easily but cooked liver makes me puke. Drinking milk always gave me diarhea or severe acne but raw milk is fine for me.
Taste is subjective
"get way more" nutritionally from raw liver isn’t accurate
as I said before cooking reduces some heat sensitive B vitamins like B12 and folate by about 10–30% there
 
Would you be able to make up for the lost nutrients with supplements? Or food diversity?

The risk to reward doesn’t seem too good.
 
Would you be able to make up for the lost nutrients with supplements? Or food diversity?

The risk to reward doesn’t seem too good.
Yes, absolutely friend. The small nutrient losses from cooking (mainly B12, folate, B6, vitamin C) can be easily replaced through dietary diversity or minimal supplementation:tiny:
 
  • +1
Reactions: otterhaspants
Let me summarize the differences between raw and cooked foods for you. I hope you’ll enjoy it, guys and at the end, let me know how you usually eat them(y)
Swedish Chef Cooking GIF



Vitamin differences:
Raw milk retains 5–10% more B2 and B12 than pasteurized milk
Raw meat has 10–40% more B vitamins (especially B6, B12, folate) than cooked meat
Raw liver contains 15–30% more B12 and folate than cooked liver
Vitamin A (in liver) is heat stable loss during cooking is minimal (10–15%)
Vitamin C present in low amounts, decreases by 10–30% with heat

Protein differences:
Cooking concentrates protein due to water loss
Raw meat and liver: 20 g protein per 100 g
Cooked meat and liver: 25–30 g protein per 100 g
Milk: protein remains unchanged (3.4 g/100 ml), raw or pasteurized

Fat differences:
Fat content is mostly stable during cooking
Some fat may melt/drip out in cooked meat/liver, slightly reducing total fat
Raw and pasteurized milk both contain 3.6 g fat per 100 ml

Mineral differences:
Minerals (iron, zinc, calcium, copper) are heat stable nearly no loss
Iron in liver: 6,7 mg/100 g, same raw or cooked
Calcium in milk: 115 120 mg/100 ml, unchanged by pasteurizatio

Enzyme differences:
Raw milk contains enzymes deactivated by pasteurization
These enzymes have negligible nutritional value
No critical enzyme difference in meat or liver

Raw versions contain slightly more heat sensitive vitamins, but differences are small (mostly 10–30%)
bump:confused:
 
No bump.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: IWANTTOHELPEVERYONE
Taste is subjective
"get way more" nutritionally from raw liver isn’t accurate
as I said before cooking reduces some heat sensitive B vitamins like B12 and folate by about 10–30% there
I see that you are low iq incel tell me how cooking that means heating burning destroying the food increases vitamins? + when heating you destroy all bacteria and parasites which are needed to your gut.
 
  • +1
Reactions: IWANTTOHELPEVERYONE
I see that you are low iq incel tell me how cooking that means heating burning destroying the food increases vitamins? + when heating you destroy all bacteria and parasites which are needed to your gut.
I never claimed that raw food is superior I cook my food It's just basic statistic
 
I see that you are low iq incel tell me how cooking that means heating burning destroying the food increases vitamins? + when heating you destroy all bacteria and parasites which are needed to your gut.
10-30% lose it's okey and I take multivitamin to replace the other important vitamins
 
10-30% lose it's okey and I take multivitamin to replace the other important vitamins
:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: you take supplements which are fake and tell people eating raw is not better are you retarded bro? I take 0 vitamins and get all the micronutrients daily from raw diet I cook some meat because it's from the store not safe to eat raw but i get liver and other organs from good source and just eat it raw.
 
:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: you take supplements which are fake and tell people eating raw is not better are you retarded bro? I take 0 vitamins and get all the micronutrients daily from raw diet I cook some meat because it's from the store not safe to eat raw but i get liver and other organs from good source and just eat it raw.
Cooking reduces bioavailability of some nutrients, but it eliminates biological threats. Also ‘supplements are fake’ is false pure micronutrients with verified content exist, and for many people with modern diets, they're the only reliable way to meet precise needs
 

Similar threads

asdvek
Replies
71
Views
409
RXnd
RXnd
Mainlander
Replies
31
Views
191
A8b4d0n
A8b4d0n
asdvek
Replies
37
Views
415
nosecel (sec acc)
nosecel (sec acc)

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top