Refuting a Common Face > Height Argument

[TeenAscender]

A common argument used by people who claim height>face use the argument that you never see short chads who are incels, but you see ugly tall people who are incel.


First of all this argument is not based off a fair comparison because:
- chad by PSL standards top 0.5 Percentile in looks, and "short" defined in this comparison is simply anything below 5'9(175cm)/bottom 40 percentile height

- A "tall" guy is a lot more common than a legitimate PSL Chad or chadlite, if we define tall as say an unfrauded 6'1/185cm or taller, then this is roughly the top 10 percentile, and ugly by PSL standards is anyone below PSL 4/ bottom 40 percentile.


The reason why no short chads are incels but tall uglies are sometimes incel is because well short chads by PSL standards are 10-20x rarer than a tall incel.


Short non-chad normies will always worry about being ridiculed for being short, and tall LTN+s will continue to be able to not only slay, but have bigger frames for strength and size, increased respect from men, be favored for LTRs, make more money, and overall be favored in this current day where seemingly the biggest thing a girl looks for is a man over 6 foot.

if you are not top 1 percentile face and short


Personally I would much rather be 6'3 and 3.5PSL then 5'6 5PSL (the two are about as rare as each other, but I think the majority of people here would agree with this statement)

***Of course Face is more important than height for creatine attention, but the failo of being short will not be made up for with a chad face as much as the failo of a below avg face being made up for with a tall masculine height

 

[Deleted member 15004]

PSL standards are fucked if you think chads are top 0.5% lmao

 

[TeenAscender]

PSL standards are fucked if you think chads are top 0.5% lmao

your right, its top 0.5% or even rarer,

I basically never see a PSL Chad when I go out irl

 

[mafiaboy]

A common argument used by people who claim height>face use the argument that you never see short chads who are incels, but you see ugly tall people who are incel.


First of all this argument is not based off a fair comparison because:
- chad by PSL standards top 0.5 Percentile in looks, and "short" defined in this comparison is simply anything below 5'9(175cm)/bottom 40 percentile height

- A "tall" guy is a lot more common than a legitimate PSL Chad or chadlite, if we define tall as say an unfrauded 6'1/185cm or taller, then this is roughly the top 10 percentile, and ugly by PSL standards is anyone below PSL 4/ bottom 40 percentile.


The reason why no short chads are incels but tall uglies are sometimes incel is because well short chads by PSL standards are 10-20x rarer than a tall incel.


Short non-chad normies will always worry about being ridiculed for being short, and tall LTN+s will continue to be able to not only slay, but have bigger frames for strength and size, increased respect from men, be favored for LTRs, make more money, and overall be favored in this current day where seemingly the biggest thing a girl looks for is a man over 6 foot.

if you are not top 1 percentile face and short


Personally I would much rather be 6'3 and 3.5PSL then 5'6 5PSL (the two are about as rare as each other, but I think the majority of people here would agree with this statement)

***Of course Face is more important than height for creatine attention, but the failo of being short will not be made up for with a chad face as much as the failo of a below avg face being made up for with a tall masculine height

Actually to be considered short you have to be 2 standard deviations behind the average height. A standard deviation in height is 2.5 inches so 2 are 5 inches 5'9.5 - 5 = 5'4.5. So in order to be considered short objectively speaking you have to be less than 5'4.5 if you are more than that you are just below average. I am not saying that 5'4.5-5'9.5 is a good height range its just that its not considered short. In order to be consdiered tall you have to be 2 standard deviations above average so you have to be 6'2.5. if you are in a university add an extra inch to that.

 

[incel194012940]

Actually to be considered short you have to be 2 standard deviations behind the average height. A standard deviation in height is 2.5 inches so 2 are 5 inches 5'9.5 - 5 = 5'4.5. So in order to be considered short objectively speaking you have to be less than 5'4.5 if you are more than that you are just below average. I am not saying that 5'4.5-5'9.5 is a good height range its just that its not considered short. In order to be consdiered tall you have to be 2 standard deviations above average so you have to be 6'2.5. if you are in a university add an extra inch to that.

Wtf is this autistic cope muhhh standard deviation who cares nigga 5’8 is short 6’2 is tall simple as that

 

[mafiaboy]

Wtf is this autistic cope muhhh standard deviation who cares nigga 5’8 is short 6’2 is tall simple as that

people are using the word short and tall wrong and i got annoyed. Its not autistic cope because its correct. You dont even explain why you consider 5'8 is short while i using the definitions of short and tall i explained it.

 

[Zylk]

Actually to be considered short you have to be 2 standard deviations behind the average height. A standard deviation in height is 2.5 inches so 2 are 5 inches 5'9.5 - 5 = 5'4.5. So in order to be considered short objectively speaking you have to be less than 5'4.5 if you are more than that you are just below average. I am not saying that 5'4.5-5'9.5 is a good height range its just that its not considered short. In order to be consdiered tall you have to be 2 standard deviations above average so you have to be 6'2.5. if you are in a university add an extra inch to that.

Less than 5'8 is short for the female gaze, world standards for men is 5'7-5'9 less than 5'6 is short.

 

[Erik-Jón]

Wtf is this autistic cope muhhh standard deviation who cares nigga 5’8 is short 6’2 is tall simple as that

From my experience even 5’8 is fucking midget to girls gotta be at least 5’10 without shoes or your smv is fucked

 

[mafiaboy]

From my experience even 5’8 is fucking midget to girls gotta be at least 5’10 without shoes or your smv is fucked

Yeah but its not considered short. In order to be short you have to be shorter than 98% of people thats the definition you cant change it. Growth hormone is given to people who are considered short and geues swhat is the criteria. It is to have prediced height 5'4 or less.

 

[Erik-Jón]

Yeah but its not considered short. In order to be short you have to be shorter than 98% of people thats the definition you cant change it. Growth hormone is given to people who are considered short and geues swhat is the criteria. It is to have prediced height 5'4 or less.

Stfu retard, 5’8 is short 5’9 is pretty much short 5’10 is passable with lifts

 

[TeenAscender]

Yeah if we lower the definition of short to 5’6 and tall to 6’2.5 then that only furthers my point

 

[Richard_Hungwell]

Height>face

Your face only starts to matter once you are tall enough.

There are much more short incels than there are tall incels.

 

[Tallooksmaxxer]

Personally I would much rather be 6'3 and 3.5PSL then 5'6 5PSL