@REGULUS is a thief that infringed my rights as a person

[Regulus Corneas]

Do you not understand the most basic, rudimentary concept of respect and personal ownership? The first thing I must ask is: how could you dare to take something so inherently mine, something that defines who I am — my name — and claim it as your own? To ask why it’s important to address this, to demand an explanation as to why this should even be considered a problem, is itself the root of the issue. It’s a fundamental breach of the most basic etiquette, and it exposes a severe misunderstanding of both boundaries and self-awareness. To impersonate me is the same as invalidating my worth as a person. I would never trample over the rights of others in such an arrogant, imperious, patronizing way. As a person, my identity is a prized possession, the most valuable thing I own, the thing that defines me as an individual, and you dare take that away? I find it astounding that people can hold such blatant disregard for others, that people so easily dismiss those things which others hold dear, that people can casually, offhandedly, obliviously request that others discard their very selves for the sake of their own amusement. Now, do not mistake me. I am not so arrogant as to ask another to change their ways. I simply think that you should feel utter disgust for yourself for the reprehensible crime you have committed. That is my opinion, and nothing more, and you cannot rob me of that. My thoughts are my own, and only the deplorable and filthy would think to plunder the sanctuary of other minds. I am free to think anything of myself and of others, regardless of any opinion you might hold.

 

[vevcred2_0]

What the fuck could ts mean vro?

 

[Neucher]

I knew it
@Volksstaffel
@REGULUS
@R1PPer
@Underdog9494

 

[PsychoH]

so you're the original or what?

 

[Regulus Corneas]

so you're the original or what?

Do you not understand the basic concept of identity? The very first question you ask, “Am I the original Regulus Corneas?” — Do you not see the complete absurdity of it? You think it's acceptable to question my authenticity, to suggest that I, Regulus Corneas, could somehow be a mere copy? The idea itself is beyond any reasonable comprehension. You ask as if my identity is something you can casually question, as if I should just answer with a simple “yes” or “no” as if it’s some trivial matter. This is an infringement to my rights as a person. It’s as if you believe that being "the original" is something to be doubted or debated — as if you are entitled to redefine or challenge who I am. But let me make this clear: I am Regulus Corneas, the Sin Archbishop of Greed, and there is no “original” or “copy” when it comes to me. There is only the existence that I am — unchallenged, undeniable, and far beyond any petty need for validation from others.

 

[Volksstaffel]

Do you not understand the most basic, rudimentary concept of respect and personal ownership? The first thing I must ask is: how could you dare to take something so inherently mine, something that defines who I am — my name — and claim it as your own? To ask why it’s important to address this, to demand an explanation as to why this should even be considered a problem, is itself the root of the issue. It’s a fundamental breach of the most basic etiquette, and it exposes a severe misunderstanding of both boundaries and self-awareness. To impersonate me is the same as invalidating my worth as a person. I would never trample over the rights of others in such an arrogant, imperious, patronizing way. As a person, my identity is a prized possession, the most valuable thing I own, the thing that defines me as an individual, and you dare take that away? I find it astounding that people can hold such blatant disregard for others, that people so easily dismiss those things which others hold dear, that people can casually, offhandedly, obliviously request that others discard their very selves for the sake of their own amusement. Now, do not mistake me. I am not so arrogant as to ask another to change their ways. I simply think that you should feel utter disgust for yourself for the reprehensible crime you have committed. That is my opinion, and nothing more, and you cannot rob me of that. My thoughts are my own, and only the deplorable and filthy would think to plunder the sanctuary of other minds. I am free to think anything of myself and of others, regardless of any opinion you might hold.

Thank you far the evidence

 

[gemy448]

Do you not understand the basic concept of identity? The very first question you ask, “Am I the original Regulus Corneas?” — Do you not see the complete absurdity of it? You think it's acceptable to question my authenticity, to suggest that I, Regulus Corneas, could somehow be a mere copy? The idea itself is beyond any reasonable comprehension. You ask as if my identity is something you can casually question, as if I should just answer with a simple “yes” or “no” as if it’s some trivial matter. This is an infringement to my rights as a person. It’s as if you believe that being "the original" is something to be doubted or debated — as if you are entitled to redefine or challenge who I am. But let me make this clear: I am Regulus Corneas, the Sin Archbishop of Greed, and there is no “original” or “copy” when it comes to me. There is only the existence that I am — unchallenged, undeniable, and far beyond any petty need for validation from others.

Are you the original regulus

 

[PsychoH]

Do you not understand the basic concept of identity? The very first question you ask, “Am I the original Regulus Corneas?” — Do you not see the complete absurdity of it? You think it's acceptable to question my authenticity, to suggest that I, Regulus Corneas, could somehow be a mere copy? The idea itself is beyond any reasonable comprehension. You ask as if my identity is something you can casually question, as if I should just answer with a simple “yes” or “no” as if it’s some trivial matter. This is an infringement to my rights as a person. It’s as if you believe that being "the original" is something to be doubted or debated — as if you are entitled to redefine or challenge who I am. But let me make this clear: I am Regulus Corneas, the Sin Archbishop of Greed, and there is no “original” or “copy” when it comes to me. There is only the existence that I am — unchallenged, undeniable, and far beyond any petty need for validation from others.

alright shut the fuck up you james sapphire wannabe.

 

[Regulus Corneas]

alright shut the fuck up you james sapphire wannabe.

What I do—who I am—has nothing to do with someone else’s existence or their actions. To say that I am a “wannabe” of anyone, to define me by their standards, is not only disrespectful but it shows an appalling lack of understanding. To label my actions as mere mimicry is to completely disregard the effort and thought I put into establishing my self. What kind of person would even do that? Obviously a loathsome and bothersome person with no manners whatsoever, with not a single decent trait to be seen. Now, you may argue that it’s simply easier to reduce others to familiar categories and fit them into pre-made molds that align with your limited understanding of the world. But in doing so, you are committing a direct violation of my rights as an individual.

 

[PsychoH]

What I do—who I am—has nothing to do with someone else’s existence or their actions. To say that I am a “wannabe” of anyone, to define me by their standards, is not only disrespectful but it shows an appalling lack of understanding. To label my actions as mere mimicry is to completely disregard the effort and thought I put into establishing my self. What kind of person would even do that? Obviously a loathsome and bothersome person with no manners whatsoever, with not a single decent trait to be seen. Now, you may argue that it’s simply easier to reduce others to familiar categories and fit them into pre-made molds that align with your limited understanding of the world. But in doing so, you are committing a direct violation of my rights as an individual.

dnrd.

 

[R1PPer]

Dnr tbh

 

[Neucher]

dnr as well

 

[Regulus Corneas]

dnrd.

Dnr tbh

dnr as well

What kind of person just ignores someone else's messages? Do you think your time is that more valuable than mine? How could you dismiss my words so flippantly without even giving them a thought? This kind of thing is not just rude, it's a gross lackof common decency, of goodmanners. It is an affront to my peaceof mind, my dignity, and my time! I have expended my effort to write words, to speak with you in a mannerthat signifies something, and you dismiss that effort with such blatant disdain! Horrible, absolutely toxic disrespect of the highest degree a human can spew.

 

[gemy448]

Dnr

 

[Underdog9494]

Read a little bit.
Repped for high effort.

 

[PsychoH]

What kind of person just ignores someone else's messages? Do you think your time is that more valuable than mine? How could you dismiss my words so flippantly without even giving them a thought? This kind of thing is not just rude, it's a gross lackof common decency, of goodmanners. It is an affront to my peaceof mind, my dignity, and my time! I have expended my effort to write words, to speak with you in a mannerthat signifies something, and you dismiss that effort with such blatant disdain! Horrible, absolutely toxic disrespect of the highest degree a human can spew.

tales from mumbai dnr.

 

[REGULUS]

Do you not understand the most basic, rudimentary concept of respect and personal ownership? The first thing I must ask is: how could you dare to take something so inherently mine, something that defines who I am — my name — and claim it as your own? To ask why it’s important to address this, to demand an explanation as to why this should even be considered a problem, is itself the root of the issue. It’s a fundamental breach of the most basic etiquette, and it exposes a severe misunderstanding of both boundaries and self-awareness. To impersonate me is the same as invalidating my worth as a person. I would never trample over the rights of others in such an arrogant, imperious, patronizing way. As a person, my identity is a prized possession, the most valuable thing I own, the thing that defines me as an individual, and you dare take that away? I find it astounding that people can hold such blatant disregard for others, that people so easily dismiss those things which others hold dear, that people can casually, offhandedly, obliviously request that others discard their very selves for the sake of their own amusement. Now, do not mistake me. I am not so arrogant as to ask another to change their ways. I simply think that you should feel utter disgust for yourself for the reprehensible crime you have committed. That is my opinion, and nothing more, and you cannot rob me of that. My thoughts are my own, and only the deplorable and filthy would think to plunder the sanctuary of other minds. I am free to think anything of myself and of others, regardless of any opinion you might hold.

incel...

i don't really know if you used an AI like gpt for writing this novel, that truly would be a disservice to me and a violation to regulus' rights~

but i ll give you the benefit of the doubt, incel. I think you may come far in this little forum, but as @ReadBooksEveryday said himself;

Caring about such things is useless and insolent.
Focus on reading, and developing yourself incel~ and success will follow.

 

[moggerofhumanity]

@REGULUS gotta chatgpt. What the hell actually uses this "—"?

 

[REGULUS]

@REGULUS gotta chatgpt. What the hell actually uses this "—"?

such bots don't have the privlage of using this; ~~

 

[Offensive Bias]

Are you someone's alt or just an autist who loves to larp as an anime character?

 

[Regulus Corneas]

incel...

i don't really know if you used an AI like gpt for writing this novel, that truly would be a disservice to me and a violation to regulus' rights~

but i ll give you the benefit of the doubt, incel. I think you may come far in this little forum, but as @ReadBooksEveryday said himself;

Caring about such things is useless and insolent.
Focus on reading, and developing yourself incel~ and success will follow.


View attachment 3558206

Don’t you understand basic concepts like politeness? You stand there, tossing around serious accusations, claiming that my words are somehow stolen or unoriginal. Stolen, you say? What a laughable, feeble attempt to undermine the freedom of my expression.
It's as though you believe I, Regulus Corneas, the most satisfied existence in the world! The most indisputably asserted, an existence without any wavering aspects ,would ever need to "steal" anything. Steal from whom, exactly? From those inferior, pitiful beings who cannot even begin to fathom the depths of my understanding and eloquence? The thought itself is preposterous! I speak only what is mine by right what I have earned through my unparalleled greatness. In other words, that is denying my individuality. It is nothing
less than infringing upon another’s rights. You are infringing on my rights me, a rational man free of want or desire. You pesky insects keep trampling over my rights, my individuality. What kind of obnoxious irrational monsters are all of you?

 

[Regulus Corneas]

Are you someone's alt or just an autist who loves to larp as an anime character?

I am Regulus Corneas representing greed , I simply feel the need to defend my individuality ,my identity ,my rights that are being threatened by vexing, dirty, unsightly scum. That shamelessly make misunderstandings, that are from my point of view, are hilariously wrong, this is why I hate getting involved with others. Scum that steal my name are better off dead. Scum that question my words are better off dead. Everyone that infringes my rights is better off dead !

 

[superpsycho]

dnr cuz lazy

 

[REGULUS]

Don’t you understand basic concepts like politeness? You stand there, tossing around serious accusations, claiming that my words are somehow stolen or unoriginal. Stolen, you say? What a laughable, feeble attempt to undermine the freedom of my expression.
It's as though you believe I, Regulus Corneas, the most satisfied existence in the world! The most indisputably asserted, an existence without any wavering aspects ,would ever need to "steal" anything. Steal from whom, exactly? From those inferior, pitiful beings who cannot even begin to fathom the depths of my understanding and eloquence? The thought itself is preposterous! I speak only what is mine by right what I have earned through my unparalleled greatness. In other words, that is denying my individuality. It is nothing
less than infringing upon another’s rights. You are infringing on my rights me, a rational man free of want or desire. You pesky insects keep trampling over my rights, my individuality. What kind of obnoxious irrational monsters are all of you?

mirin if you typing like this tbh~

 

[Neucher]

it's Regulus alt @Volksstaffel has proof

 

[Regulus Corneas]

it's Regulus alt @Volksstaffel has proof

DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF INDIVIDUALITY?! There is only one Regulus corneas me and only me . A single unique existence free of desire, free of everything. Unsightly scum like you don’t even have the basic level of consideration that normally shouldn’t be explained, am I wrong? Are you doing this on purpose ? Have you lived your life until now by denying people of their rights as an individual? Or are you having this obtuse manner in order to make me angry? Regardless, what you are doing is violating both mine and @REGULUS rights! Since you refuse to acknowledge us as a different entity thus invalidating both of us at the same time . No rational man would do such a thing . Is this place filled with irrational obnoxious people who throw around baseless accusations?!?