greycel
It's hard to be Good in a World of Evil 🧑🏻🌾
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Posts
- 9,080
- Reputation
- 18,993
You might think of @davidlaidisme67 as being a retarded user, but he made a good thread once:
Of course, factors such as higher T = lower entry requirements (looks), contribute to this... but the above cannot be discounted. You'll also see below, that anything specialized (to a sufficient enough degree), can be used to be associated to something else. What that means is, if you have something too general in nature, it has connections to multiple events (present everywhere), whereas something specific enough can only be linked to far fewer events (even 1)...
This extends from the visual domain to touch too. The somatosensory system, which concerns any sensory information related to touch/pain/temperature...
It goes even further than this, to the auditory, cognitive, olfactory, vestibular... etc
I remember this thread where this guy whenever he used to get his girl wet for sex, before engaging he would pinch her at a specific part of her stomach
He did this for years
Eventually whenever he pinched her there she would instantly become wet, before he even got her in the mood
The link was made
It makes you wonder, how many of these reinforced loops exist, everywhere
People are good at conditioning themselves to conform to not just physical stimuli, but also deeper mental and emotional... anything environmental really, they'll innately justify and work incorporating it
You can use this to your advantage, and I have before when I was younger, but it feels almost predatory... intentionally moulding the other person for yourself. I personally would never do it
If you do, make sure whatever action the other person is experiencing you do (words/movements), deviates sufficiently from the norm, so it can't be classed as generic... it needs to be specific enough + consistent [enough], until it becomes 2nd nature for them
Of course, factors such as higher T = lower entry requirements (looks), contribute to this... but the above cannot be discounted. You'll also see below, that anything specialized (to a sufficient enough degree), can be used to be associated to something else. What that means is, if you have something too general in nature, it has connections to multiple events (present everywhere), whereas something specific enough can only be linked to far fewer events (even 1)...
How often are you doing an action as specific as pinching somebody on the stomach, specifically before sexual intercourse... that too being done consistently - your brain will form a link even though there aren't any apparent underlying connections
This extends from the visual domain to touch too. The somatosensory system, which concerns any sensory information related to touch/pain/temperature...
It goes even further than this, to the auditory, cognitive, olfactory, vestibular... etc
I remember this thread where this guy whenever he used to get his girl wet for sex, before engaging he would pinch her at a specific part of her stomach
He did this for years
Eventually whenever he pinched her there she would instantly become wet, before he even got her in the mood
The link was made
It makes you wonder, how many of these reinforced loops exist, everywhere
People are good at conditioning themselves to conform to not just physical stimuli, but also deeper mental and emotional... anything environmental really, they'll innately justify and work incorporating it
You can use this to your advantage, and I have before when I was younger, but it feels almost predatory... intentionally moulding the other person for yourself. I personally would never do it
If you do, make sure whatever action the other person is experiencing you do (words/movements), deviates sufficiently from the norm, so it can't be classed as generic... it needs to be specific enough + consistent [enough], until it becomes 2nd nature for them
Last edited:
