Relative Penetration of Wavelenghts Into The Skin

D

Deleted member 21532

6'4 mogger kid.
Joined
Aug 16, 2022
Posts
2,298
Reputation
2,203
View attachment CB9B696B-509B-4C99-B299-6612C2CFB32F.webp


This diagram is more like what you would find in peer reviewed published literature.

In several studies, the penetration ranges between 1mm to just beyond 5mm deep for both Red and NIR. Not much! Definitely not as much as those misleading diagrams!

Studies note that to optimize penetration they should also use higher intensities, skin contact, and continuous wave (not pulsing). Pulsing is helpful for penetration ONLY if excessive heating becomes a problem!

So it would be great if other panel companies would be honest about intensity so people can properly understand dosing and penetration. And at least acknowledge the disadvantage of being 6+ inches away. Oh yeah and not add pulsing just to make new false claims about it.

Some studies have found penetration up to 40-50mm when employing higher intensities (even with Red)! However, they note that high intensity can become detrimental to the skin and upper tissue. Which is where pulsing may be helpful.

And we know many people are getting great benefits with LED panels and parameters that don't directly penetrate as deeply as we thought.

So how does that work? Is it all placebo?

Certainly not, many studies understand that the penetration isn't as deep as we thought. And the benefits for the brain and deeper tissue could be explained through secondary mechanisms and systemic effects that bring the benefits deeper into the body.

So we don't need to get caught up trying to blast our brains with high intensity lights. We can use lower intensity and allow the body to do what it needs to do.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JawGuyFatFaceGuy
S3x?
 
  • +1
Reactions: JawGuyFatFaceGuy
View attachment 1844112


This diagram is more like what you would find in peer reviewed published literature.

In several studies, the penetration ranges between 1mm to just beyond 5mm deep for both Red and NIR. Not much! Definitely not as much as those misleading diagrams!

Studies note that to optimize penetration they should also use higher intensities, skin contact, and continuous wave (not pulsing). Pulsing is helpful for penetration ONLY if excessive heating becomes a problem!

So it would be great if other panel companies would be honest about intensity so people can properly understand dosing and penetration. And at least acknowledge the disadvantage of being 6+ inches away. Oh yeah and not add pulsing just to make new false claims about it.

Some studies have found penetration up to 40-50mm when employing higher intensities (even with Red)! However, they note that high intensity can become detrimental to the skin and upper tissue. Which is where pulsing may be helpful.

And we know many people are getting great benefits with LED panels and parameters that don't directly penetrate as deeply as we thought.

So how does that work? Is it all placebo?

Certainly not, many studies understand that the penetration isn't as deep as we thought. And the benefits for the brain and deeper tissue could be explained through secondary mechanisms and systemic effects that bring the benefits deeper into the body.

So we don't need to get caught up trying to blast our brains with high intensity lights. We can use lower intensity and allow the body to do what it needs to do.
Why do that bs just go to dermatologist and get treatment done.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexBrown84

Similar threads

irrumator praetor
Replies
31
Views
771
boss8055
boss8055
Bread&Butter
Replies
32
Views
2K
typeshitboutme
T
n9wiff
Replies
30
Views
946
NoLongerHuman
NoLongerHuman
donkeyskin
Replies
17
Views
1K
BinPanda
BinPanda

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top