yeah all ratio are to some extent related to the case by case's face. but his is actually in high 20s not in 30s
Yup. PFL measured in a ratio would be much better
and that's why smb like chico used to have so much appeal in his prime : isolated his ratio were "uhm ok" but Taken into account his face and overall structure - even of the skull- it's what him so harmonious
In relation to harmony, a higher pfl will look better overall than a lower one. We're not talking about the eye area itself, but how it looks with the rest of your face.
true ngl, i'm coping by saying that it's not that important but i would probably give up a finger to have longer PFL
Sorry didn't read this bit. It's what supports chadlitea to Chad, I agree.
the thing is that it's pretty easy to fix pfh
fuaaark literally no way to increase PFL without surgically raping your orbitals and ending up with artificial looking eyes
No way... I thought it was the hardest thing to fix.
lower eyelid rétractation, upper eyelid fillers/fat graft.
I'm not too good on what's a long midface and what isn't. There was a thread on it though
i reckon you should remove or at least limit UEE with fat grafts and improve under eye support with infraorbital implants or smth like that
That doesn't increase the width, just lowered the height
Tbh I actually think vertical narrowness is way overrated... The ideal vertical height is as high as possible without vertical scleral show (think Barrett/O'pry) , of course this works better on high PFL cause with bad PFL your eyes would look like legit circles
