Reminder to never listen to Andrew Tate

[dreamcake1mo]

This is who you look up to.

They are generally two types of people in this world. GOY, and actual intelligent beings. The goy is synonymous to a human animal. This in my observation is the more prolific class of people. They represent the biological preposition and are in prolific numbers, both male and female. These are typically men and women who subscribe to their animal instincts and nature, instead of subscribing to their inner intelligence that takes possession over their animal preposition. This is important.

See, andrew tate is a larp, because he pretends to portray the image of a man who subscribed over his animal preposition. But what he really is doing, is rebranding the animal preposition to be something of noble character, and not goy behavior. If you've been paying attention, this is done a lot. With toxic masculinity and masculinity spaces portraying particular archetypes as masculine. People who subscribe to self harm beliefs and copes, provider mentalities, genetic survival (dad/leader) troupes and archetypes, and such all are trying to fulfil the image of masculinity though animal prepositions.

When intelligence refers to the "blind leading the blind" this is what they refer to. The blind being the animal preposition. The human body is scheduled to die. The time is always ticking for the body, and is thus not a sutiable instrument of life, but death. The animal is a being of death and darkness. It knows nothing outside of itself and its own instinct. intelligence, virtue, moral precision, on the other hand is a glimpse of something greater.

One thing you should keep in mind is how these goy desperately want you to suffer and live like an animal. Genetic failures like andrew tate who project closeted homosexuality for the sake of reproducing are the ones creating these class of goy and failures we see today. Ironically, if sex was more about pleasure instead of reproduction we would be seeing less destruction as humanity.

 

[Deleted member 54067]

he is a larper. he surrounds himself with bimbos then he says what he said in the tweet. anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see that he isnt smart just because his dad is muh pro chess player

 

[ElTruecel]

Nah he’s right sex is for making children lol but due to the sexual revolution it’s more pleasure based. It always was used that way but not as bad as now.

That take from him isn’t really wrong.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Nah he’s right sex is for making children lol but due to the sexual revolution it’s more pleasure based. It always was used that way but not as bad as now.

That take from him isn’t really wrong.

Its very wrong.

I wouldn't say kids is the purpose of sex at all. But what i will say is that its paradoxal. That's because, sex is one of, if not the greatest form of connection two bodies can have. Yet kids have always been a consequence of sex. The reason a man would have sex with a women naturally would be for pleasure and connection. Its ideals after this which would subscribe a man to initially want to have sex with a women for kids.

Most intelligent beings that ever walked the planet or were told as myths never had kids. Jesus, Buddha, Tesla etc. Even Hitler (allegedly).

Tates probably trolling, but nonetheless, he's wrong and is trying to subscribe the male burden (biological preposition) as some noble act. This is what the voice of the goys do often.

Its more homosexual to have kids for the sake of genetic survival than it is for pleasure. This is precisely why the world is so fake and gay now. A bunch of ideologist eunech men who probably have very bad genetic behavior decide to subscribe to traditional masculine ideology, despite lacking truly great masculine traits (like divergency, intelligence, moral precision etc.) to figure out its a big sham in the first place. These guys have kids and pass their genes and biological preposition to the next. The apple does not rot far from the tree.

The same way homosexuals have girlfriends and wives, and pretend as if they are straight, yet at night swing their wives and themselves. A huge larp. There's no natural T man who will tell you sex for pleasure is more gay than sex for reproduction. Even the intelligent ones know having kids is a huge Pandora's box. On top of that, this is coming from a dude who probably has lived his life having sex for pleasure. But he will have the goys believe this.

 

[karpeltunnel]

Its very wrong.

I wouldn't say kids is the purpose of sex at all. But what i will say is that its paradoxal. That's because, sex is one of, if not the greatest form of connection two bodies can have. Yet kids have always been a consequence of sex. The reason a man would have sex with a women naturally would be for pleasure and connection. Its ideals after this which would subscribe a man to initially want to have sex with a women for kids.

Most intelligent beings that ever walked the planet or were told as myths never had kids. Jesus, Buddha, Tesla etc. Even Hitler (allegedly).

Tates probably trolling, but nonetheless, he's wrong and is trying to subscribe the male burden (biological preposition) as some noble act. This is what the voice of the goys do often.

Its more homosexual to have kids for the sake of genetic survival than it is for pleasure. This is precisely why the world is so fake and gay now. A bunch of ideologist eunech men who probably have very bad genetic behavior decide to subscribe to traditional masculine ideology, despite lacking truly great masculine traits (like divergency, intelligence, moral precision etc.) to figure out its a big sham in the first place. These guys have kids and pass their genes and biological preposition to the next. The apple does not rot far from the tree.

The same way homosexuals have girlfriends and wives, and pretend as if they are straight, yet at night swing their wives and themselves. A huge larp. There's no natural T man who will tell you sex for pleasure is more gay than sex for reproduction. Even the intelligent ones know having kids is a huge Pandora's box. On top of that, this is coming from a dude who probably has lived his life having sex for pleasure. But he will have the goys believe this.

Do you think ideally as men we should seek sex? Like you said the most intelligent beings to walk the earth never had kids, and were reported to have little or no girlfriends/wives.

Also in the same vein, what do you think about masturbation? Is it a normal behaviour that should be acted on, or is it a perversion of our sexual drive.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Do you think ideally as men we should seek sex? Like you said the most intelligent beings to walk the earth never had kids, and were reported to have little or no girlfriends/wives.

Also in the same vein, what do you think about masturbation? Is it a normal behaviour that should be acted on, or is it a perversion of our sexual drive.

I have no idea where you are in your stage of life and understanding. I am not the author of your life.

I think the natural progression would be asexuality. Though, i wont say this is where you should be at w. Let me explain. Remember, sex is essentially connection and pleasure. The childbirth stuff is ultimately the consequences after sex. But look, i personally don't think you will really find any authentic and genuine connection, loyalty, and companionship with a modern women in todays society due to various circumstances of our society im sure you also understand. So really the remaining values of sex would only be worth it for pleasure, and even thats barely worth the squeeze and overpriced. Especially with stds and diseases (Of course another consequence to sex without companionship).

So the choices are laid out for you. Masturbation is the same. Its definitely a perversion of sexual drive. But, realize the life of our generation is a far greater evil and injustice that instructs these perversions to occur. So if your in conflict of the morality of your behavior, always consider that. Not to say you should masturbate.

Eventually i think, in todays time, the best decision you can make would be asexuality. You may even grow to be this way through intelligent narrative. Perhaps even biologically, as the body does tend to shut of inefficiencies naturally, thus perhaps your libido and drive to have sex. But i cant recommend it due to me knowing part cause is likely a romantic injustice itself.

Im not quite sure if theres light at the end of the tunnel when it comes to this.. Im also dealing with the same conflictions you have asked me.

Also, i will say, archetypes like tate who say marriage this and marriage that are grifters. Notice how they themselves seek and have the pleasures of sex, while with the same breath encourage trad shit like marriage despite current society. Meanwhile, their brothers admit to having sex with thousands of women, while they themselves get rich of pimping and exploiting the sufferings of men who desperately look for leadership.

 

[karpeltunnel]

I have no idea where you are in your stage of life and understanding. I am not the author of your life.

I think the natural progression would be asexuality. Though, i wont say this is for certain where you should be at right now. Let me explain. Remember, sex is essentially connection and pleasure. The childbirth and stuff is ultimately the consequences after sex. But look, i personally dont think you wont really find any authentic and genuine connection, loyalty, and companionship with a modern women in todays society due to various circumstances of our society im sure you also understand. So really the value of sex is really worth it for pleasure, and even thats barely worth the squeeze and overpriced.

So the choices are laid out for you. Masturbation is the same. Its definitely a perversion of sexual drive. But look, realize that the life of our generation is a far greater evil and injustice that instructs these perversions to occur than masturbation. So if your in conflict of the morality of your behavior, always consider that.

Eventually i think, in todays time, the best decision you can make would be asexuality. You may even grow to be this way through intelligent narrative. Perhaps even biologically, as the body does tend to shut of inefficiencies naturally, thus perhaps your libido and drive to have sex. Im not quite sure whats at the end of the tunnel when it comes to this, as im also dealing with these same conflictions you yourself have and asked me.

Also, what i will say is this, these archetypes like tate who say marriage this and marriage that are grifters. Notice how they themselves seek and have the pleasures of sex, while with the same breath encourage all this trad shit like marriage despite current society. Meanwhile, their brothers admit to having sex with thousands of women, while they themselves get rich of pimping and exploiting the sufferings of men who desperately look for leadership.

I agree on your anyalsis of tate, nothing they say can really be taken seriously as they have profit as their bottom line for every action they take, plus they aren't really intelligent.

I understand thats it's very hard to find a competent women in this day and age and if you give up on attaining them that effort and energy must be placed elsewhere, and I believe thats what truly great and intelligent people do, they don't even think of women because they're so focused on their goal/purpose. Da vinci and Newton being modern examples, as both were reported to be asexual ,and are geniuses, which fits with what you said as asexuality being the next intelligent step.

The problem is 99% of people if not having sex don't have a goal and instead resort to masturbation usually with porn and doing it in excess. In this case masturbation seems like a normal function, an abundance of energy with no outlet and since they can't divert it into a women and or a goal, they masturbate. From my own experience I've found that limiting masturbation and obviously no porn/ limiting lusting at any overly sexual women, has had profound effects both mentally and physically. You're very knowledgable, from the posts of yours i've read, so I was wondering if you had any insights if trying to never masturbate has any positive effects. Or would it have the opposite effect and due to repressing all sexual activity, negative issues would arrive instead both mentally and physically?

In short, is limiting sexual activity/lust both via sex and masturbation something that should be strived for? Or is it a useless and or fruitless affair.

 

[fukmylyf]

does he even have children

 

[mrdouchebag]

Tate is a moron. He fucked god knows how many whores. He claims that he is a Muslim, yet he still engages in debauchery and degeneracy. He owned a cam business and he was the one who was typing messages to some oldcel trying to help him reach climax. He and his brother reproduced with a couple of camwhores and they somehow call them "wives". These camwhores are showing their punani and shoving all kinds of objects inside them for every random man on the internet to see. Also, Tristan was known to abuse and blackmail his own baby mama in order for her to keep working on tiktok and onlyfans and was threatening to kick her about of the house along with his kid.

The Tates:
a)are debaucherous degenerates
b)are faggotmaxxers
c)are hypocrites and are the farthest away from god and religion one can be
d)have reproduced with prosties, thus all their kids are spawns of dirty prostitutes full of plastic
e)allegedly were involved in a bunch of shady business, from virtual pimping to money laundering
f)have terrible taste in bugatti colors

Noone should take them seriously obviously.

 

[LVZZO]

Like many things is not a 1 or 0
He is a true liar and a manipulative scumbag but you have to separate the words from who says the words, some of his advice is pretty legit

 

[dreamcake1mo]

I agree on your anyalsis of tate, nothing they say can really be taken seriously as they have profit as their bottom line for every action they take, plus they aren't really intelligent.

I understand thats it's very hard to find a competent women in this day and age and if you give up on attaining them that effort and energy must be placed elsewhere, and I believe thats what truly great and intelligent people do, they don't even think of women because they're so focused on their goal/purpose. Da vinci and Newton being modern examples, as both were reported to be asexual ,and are geniuses, which fits with what you said as asexuality being the next intelligent step.

The problem is 99% of people if not having sex don't have a goal and instead resort to masturbation usually with porn and doing it in excess. In this case masturbation seems like a normal function, an abundance of energy with no outlet and since they can't divert it into a women and or a goal, they masturbate. From my own experience I've found that limiting masturbation and obviously no porn/ limiting lusting at any overly sexual women, has had profound effects both mentally and physically. You're very knowledgable, from the posts of yours i've read, so I was wondering if you had any insights if trying to never masturbate has any positive effects. Or would it have the opposite effect and due to repressing all sexual activity, negative issues would arrive instead both mentally and physically?

In short, is limiting sexual activity/lust both via sex and masturbation something that should be strived for? Or is it a useless and or fruitless affair.

I think you pretty much answered your own question. Its not a fruitless affair. Let me give you some personal experiences going nofap.

I for one practiced no fap for a long time. And i can agree, it definitely has very profound affects when it comes to productivity. The only thing is that, its hard to tell if it was the actual act of deciding to go nofap (practicing dedication daily), or if it was a biological component. But eventually i failed. Negative effects did arise such as a constant sexual desire, wet dreams and such. And i think this is because masturbating itself is a deviancy that normally should not prolifically exist, and has not existed until very recent modern times.

The practice of abstaining is especially powerful if your in a healthy relationship with a partner, and i think this is where the true benefits are realized. For example, even the smart guys who practiced asexuality like newton, da vinci and such still had relationships with their loved one. Just that many were vocal in abstaining to give complete focus on their careers. If your in a relationship with a girl you like and can have sex with, there's zero option you masterbate when you choose to abstain. And back then relationships were not this hard, women and media weren't this actively feministic and such things that create this reality of sexual injustice today.

What people call abstaining in todays time is not this. The case with nofap is not a man choosing to not eat food. Its usually a case of a man not having enough food from the start and needing to not eat food out of necessity. Two different things which lead to two different residual effects.

I think masturbation is ultimately a result of not having quality sexual relationships in your life. The reason masturbation is not spoken of in religious texts, or even by old intelligent men in detail is because back then, the situation with women and relationships never really got this bad. Going back, i would certainly have at least attempted to cultivate more sexual relationships, especially ones where i actively practice and achieve dynamics typically counter culture of todays time.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Like many things is not a 1 or 0
He is a true liar and a manipulative scumbag but you have to separate the words from who says the words, some of his advice is pretty legit

If hes a liar than you should already know most of his good advice is probably out bad faith . If i have to separate and filter out his words as a majority its simply better to listen to someone else who at least can give me majorly good information.

Because lets be honest, most of it is conventional wisdom. Theres no lack of information on the internet.

 

[Thebuffdon]

Isn’t his body count like 600+? How tf do these people spout such hypocritical nonsense? Blows my fucking mind.

 

[Deleted member 47042]

He's right but also extremely delusional and a lier, mirin

 

[Dylan]

View attachment 2879024



This is who you look up to.

They are generally two types of people in this world. GOY, and actual intelligent beings. The goy is synonymous to a human animal. This in my observation is the more prolific class of people. They represent the biological preposition and are in prolific numbers, both male and female. These are typically men and women who subscribe to their animal instincts and nature, instead of subscribing to their inner intelligence that takes possession over their animal preposition. This is important.

See, andrew tate is a larp, because he pretends to portray the image of a man who subscribed over his animal preposition. But what he really is doing, is rebranding the animal preposition to be something of noble character, and not goy behavior. If you've been paying attention, this is done a lot. With toxic masculinity and masculinity spaces portraying particular archetypes as masculine. People who subscribe to self harm beliefs and copes, provider mentalities, genetic survival (dad/leader) troupes and archetypes, and such all are trying to fulfil the image of masculinity though animal prepositions.

When intelligence refers to the "blind leading the blind" this is what they refer to. The blind being the animal preposition. The human body is scheduled to die. The time is always ticking for the body, and is thus not a sutiable instrument of life, but death. The animal is a being of death and darkness. It knows nothing outside of itself and its own instinct. intelligence, virtue, moral precision, on the other hand is a glimpse of something greater.

One thing you should keep in mind is how these goy desperately want you to suffer and live like an animal. Genetic failures like andrew tate who project closeted homosexuality for the sake of reproducing are the ones creating these class of goy and failures we see today. Ironically, if sex was more about pleasure instead of reproduction we would be seeing less destruction as humanity.

That tweet sounded based as fuck and I'm not even a Tate fan.

 

[Deleted member 46941]

I'm an anti natalist and Andrew Tate is my enemy

 

[LegitUser]

why is he yapping again. He should go back to prision

 

[looksmaxxed]

he's right, sex is retarded. pleasure and stimulating dopamine release for the sake of it is gay and low iq. doing what's hard, receiving pain instead of pleasure, while securing the survival of our children and the future of white race is very based

 

[dreamcake1mo]

he's right, sex is retarded. pleasure and stimulating dopamine release for the sake of it is gay and low iq. doing what's hard, receiving pain instead of pleasure, while securing the survival of our children and the future of white race is very based

Very based and also the dumbest shit a person can believe in today.

Imagine passing this belief to your children. That he should strive to be a selfless cuck who basically is a host for the worlds pain.

If you love pain, then you should love hell.

Society is cucked, especially men. Men have been deceived for generations to believe there's value in struggling, or that getting the bad end of the stick makes you a man. Meanwhile women and the elites (wealthiest people in society), who "collectively" do less of these things, sit around and gaslight you into this mindset, so you are better slaves for them. Its very convenient to the person benefiting, if they can make you believe that your a host of endless struggle they are collectively part responsible of causing.

Its to the point where men would literally deny their own instincts and body for this delusion. Like, thinking pleasure and stimulating dopamine is gay and low iq. Is this common sense? It may be a low form instinct, but this lets me know that men are even more low when they mark it as something it is not. Especially to say, living a painful life is to strive for. Bro, pleasure and stimulation is pretty much the only good things our bodies can do for us.

The future is not striving to remove these things, but at best replacing them with alternative, healthy and sustainable substitutions. So that, pleasure and stimulating dopamine is not a harmful thing that requires others sacrifices and other dull ends.

Also, fuck having children. The only reason you need to ensure the survival of your children - is if you brought them in a world that requires such a harsh standard for survival in the first place. Bad judgement in todays society.

 

[Charles the Fat]

I find it hard to believe he doesn’t fuck his whores or get blowjobs from them

 

[New Poster]

This is the logical end of thr redpill. Living a life of non-stop suffering and work to provide for others. Any pleasure you experience has to be incidental at best in this worldview. Suicide seems more appealing tbh.

 

[Latinus]

1: Does he really think anyone believe what he says? Does anyone seriously believe that Andrew only engage in sexual intercourse for reproductive purposes?

2: Wow! And I thought gay meant: a dude who's only sexually atracted to men. But it seems that the definitions have changed (or expanded). If it wasn't for the majestic mind of Andrew Tate I wouldn't be aware of the change.

3: Projection? Could it be that this mockery is actually what he says when is engaging in sexual intercourse?

4: Again with the expansion of the definition of what it means to be a gay man.

According to him some poor/miserable guy should have 5 or more kids (and condemn them to a shit life) because, according to him, that's what makes you a "real man".

Having 5 or more kids is easy for him to say, because he's rich. If he was poor, I doubt he would romantize having many kids.

Just another dude living a bubble totally disconected from the reality of the average joe.

5: "Muh legacy". And it's not like some ugly receded bald dude with an inferiority complex will leave a good legacy to this world.

Ironically, his shaming of men that don't live according to his view of the world is not much different from a woman bashing a guy (and calling him gay) simply for refusing her advances.

 

[iblamericky]

Andrew Tate is such a larping faggot can’t believe I used to think he had value in the world

 

[LKSMAXPerson]

If you thought this guy was smart. Your either gullible or low iq because he said some of the most lukewarm takes