Sarms are honestly great

Bitchwhipper2

Bitchwhipper2

Even at my lois I'm still a family guy
Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Posts
19,631
Reputation
30,634
Gained lots of muscle. 0 sides apart from acne on rad140 (shit sarms tbh)

Will do lgd4033 next
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts, itzyaboyJJ, GrainMunchingGoy and 1 other person
did you use any test base? Im cutting right now and feeling smaller than im used to is suifuel but dont really wanna touch needles.
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and Bitchwhipper2
did you use any test base? Im cutting right now and feeling smaller than im used to is suifuel but dont really wanna touch needles.
I use nolvadex. Shouldve used enclo, but im fine
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and GrainMunchingGoy
5ECD068C 7868 41A2 821D 0A354DA75296

until your hair starts thinning, falling apart. on minox and fin for life
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and Bitchwhipper2
you probably dint do any blood tests but do you feel fine, as in did your libido and other test markers stay similar to before, also how much muscle did you gain in how long of a cycle?
 
So.... you're a retard?

Nice to add another one to the list of "known retards".


You should be on that anyway.
keep coping while you’re balding, once you’re on it, your hair’s on life support. baldi :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
keep coping while you’re balding, once you’re on it, your hair’s on life support. baldi :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
Anyone who remotely cares about their looks and doesn't have the IQ of a donkey would be on Fin, unless you are like 16, which I am assuming you are, or younger.

And your claim about "still binding to the androgen receptor" goes to show you literally know absolutely fuck all about what you are talking about, and you should stop talking because you are embarrassing yourself with such incorrect information. You have no credibility to talk after such statement. In the context of RU, no, it is not binding to the androgen receptor.

Sounds like ragebait though due to how obviously incorrect you are.

Lgd doesn’t increase dht
All androgens cause hair loss if precautions aren't taken.
 
  • +1
Reactions: edodalic29
Anyone who remotely cares about their looks and doesn't have the IQ of a donkey would be on Fin, unless you are like 16, which I am assuming you are, or younger.

And your claim about "still binding to the androgen receptor" goes to show you literally know absolutely fuck all about what you are talking about, and you should stop talking because you are embarrassing yourself with such incorrect information. You have no credibility to talk after such statement. In the context of RU, no, it is not binding to the androgen receptor.

Sounds like ragebait though due to how obviously incorrect you are.


All androgens cause hair loss if precautions aren't taken.
LGD-4033 is highly selective. Even doses of 100 mg/kg/day in castrated rats (an equivalent of 1500 mg/day in humans) were not able to restore more than 50% of their prostate weight. At dosages of 30 mg/kg/day, prostate weight in intact rats DECREASED by approximately one-third. In other words, even very high doses of LGD-4033 caused a decrease in androgenic activity in the body. How could they cause hair loss? It does not make sense! Therefore, it is very likely that all the internet stories about "hair thinning" on LGD-4033 are pure paranoid fantasies.

BTW, I was taking LGD-4033 twice at only 2.5 mg/day (which was more than effective) and I did not observe any androgenic sides whatsoever - and I am extremely sensitive in this regard. In contrast, oxandrolone at 60+ mg/day used to make my skin oily. And it is the safest steroid available (together with nandrolone).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
LGD-4033 is highly selective. Even doses of 100 mg/kg/day in castrated rats (an equivalent of 1500 mg/day in humans) were not able to restore more than 50% of their prostate weight. At dosages of 30 mg/kg/day, prostate weight in intact rats DECREASED by approximately one-third. In other words, even very high doses of LGD-4033 caused a decrease in androgenic activity in the body. How could they cause hair loss? It does not make sense! Therefore, it is very likely that all the internet stories about "hair thinning" on LGD-4033 are pure paranoid fantasies.

BTW, I was taking LGD-4033 twice at only 2.5 mg/day (which was more than effective) and I did not observe any androgenic sides whatsoever - and I am extremely sensitive in this regard. In contrast, oxandrolone at 60+ mg/day used to make my skin oily. And it is the safest steroid available (together with nandrolone).
I have used it also before. I am not saying you are going to go blad or lose hair even on LGD. I am aware it is very hair safe and selective. It doesn't mean though you can't lose hair on it. Despite the fact it is selective, it can still bind to AR in hair and cause some loss. Its a:a is 10:1 so it is still androgenic somewhat. It doesn't hurt to use RU with it, just to be safe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: edodalic29 and Bitchwhipper2
literally affects your scalp too retard
Lgd is very tissue selective. Its activation of the androgen receptor in the scalp is very weak. The instance of hairloss on it is very rare compared to even other sarms such as rad140

So yea, sure. Theres a risk, but its very low to the point of near irrelevancy.
 
Therefore, it is very likely that all the internet stories about "hair thinning" on LGD-4033 are pure paranoid fantasies.
This is likely people without a test base who experience TE due to hormonal fluctuations mostly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: edodalic29 and Bitchwhipper2
Anyone who remotely cares about their looks and doesn't have the IQ of a donkey would be on Fin, unless you are like 16, which I am assuming you are, or younger.

And your claim about "still binding to the androgen receptor" goes to show you literally know absolutely fuck all about what you are talking about, and you should stop talking because you are embarrassing yourself with such incorrect information. You have no credibility to talk after such statement. In the context of RU, no, it is not binding to the androgen receptor.

Sounds like ragebait though due to how obviously incorrect you are.


All androgens cause hair loss if precautions aren't taken.
uh oh, baldi is angry? a cope pill to delay the inevitable :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: RU still affects the androgen pathway, whether it binds directly or acts as an antagonist, it’s still in the mix. why do people report hair shedding and shutdowns? your hairline’s not coming back. bald boy
 
I have used it also before. I am not saying you are going to go blad or lose hair even on LGD. I am aware it is very hair safe and selective. It doesn't mean though you can't lose hair on it. Despite the fact it is selective, it can still bind to AR in hair and cause some loss. Its a:a is 10:1 so it is still androgenic somewhat. It doesn't hurt to use RU with it, just to be safe.
A:A ratio is kinda cope tbh.

Apparently rad has an A:A rating of 1-100, but lgd deathmogs it in practice
 
uh oh, baldi is angry? a cope pill to delay the inevitable :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: RU still affects the androgen pathway, whether it binds directly or acts as an antagonist, it’s still in the mix. why do people report hair shedding and shutdowns? your hairline’s not coming back. bald boy
Shut up tbh
 
uh oh, baldi is angry? a cope pill to delay the inevitable :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: RU still affects the androgen pathway, whether it binds directly or acts as an antagonist, it’s still in the mix. why do people report hair shedding and shutdowns? your hairline’s not coming back. bald boy
Cope, my raped hairline due to AAS fully came back after RU, just like it was before usage.

What you gonna say now JFL?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
Hair loss or acne are the two most overhyped and fear mongered terms to ever be associated with steriods , they literally make this shit up , i was on way harsher stuff and still am doing fine
 
Cope, my raped hairline due to AAS fully came back after RU, just like it was before usage.

What you gonna say now JFL?
you’re still on it for life, what are you gonna do once you’re off it? your hairline’s gonna get fucked the moment you stop. you’re just a slave to it now. on a lifetime on it. living in fear of your next shipment running late or missing a dose of it. you didn’t fix shit. the second you stop, it’s over. follicle genocide :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
you’re still on it for life, what are you gonna do once you’re off it? your hairline’s gonna get fucked the moment you stop. you’re just a slave to it now. on a lifetime on it. living in fear of your next shipment running late or missing a dose of it. you didn’t fix shit. the second you stop, it’s over. follicle genocide :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
No it’s not. It’s called Dutasteride. I will use Dutasteride for life, like everyone that’s got some common sense. I’ve been off RU before and don’t lose a molecule due to Duta.
 
No it’s not. It’s called Dutasteride. I will use Dutasteride for life, like everyone that’s got some common sense. I’ve been off RU before and don’t lose a molecule due to Duta.
so you’re on dutasteride for life too. chained to that just to keep dead follicles pretending they’re alive. delaying the inevitable while nuking your dht. popping pills forever, scared to miss a dose of it, living with chemically castrated dht levels while your hormones rot :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 

Similar threads

RamirezDalitMax5000
Replies
26
Views
314
1966Ford
1966Ford
TheVoidInside
Replies
10
Views
167
Palang
Palang
shredded4summer
Replies
19
Views
221
lurker999
L
D
Replies
5
Views
117
134applesauce456
134applesauce456
Orthognathic
Replies
15
Views
240
zaebalsya
zaebalsya

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top