sean o'pry is true wabi sabi

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

wabi sabi is unique flaws that help if I am not mistaken and this is perfectly the case with sean
his uper third has lots of flaws life eyebrow tilt, eyeshape, ressed under eyes but is still HEAVENLY and mogs mathematicly beter eyes like jordan,

His flaws are
narrow maxila, very bad nose shape, lips, downgrowth, medium remus, gonions and flawed bite so you whould think he is subhuman but no he is a gigachad.

 

[pfl]

He just looks htn

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

He just looks htn

htn in the chrystal palaces of hyperborea

 

[pfl]

htn in the chrystal palaces of hyperborea

Htn in real life

 

[Aryan Incel]

Just have a perfect eye area theory

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Just have a perfect eye area theory

no hella flawed and brakes the psl skale, in theory de la cruz mogs his eyes JFL

 

[Avagar Nexus]

I think his “flaws” are the things that are the least noticeable, eyes seem to carry most of the weight, and to have a decent jaw, plus his ratios are good enough, and nose it’s just hooked I wouldn’t called it a bad shape, Lowkey it’s somehow true wabi sabi nose, special

 

[boxillo]

wabi sabi is unique flaws that help if I am not mistaken and this is perfectly the case with sean
his uper third has lots of flaws life eyebrow tilt, eyeshape, ressed under eyes but is still HEAVENLY and mogs mathematicly beter eyes like jordan,

His flaws are
narrow maxila, very bad nose shape, lips, downgrowth, medium remus, gonions and flawed bite so you whould think he is subhuman but no he is a gigachad.

shut up

 

[The Fool]

hes proof eyes and angularity are everything

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

shut up

 

[boxillo]

View attachment 4346077

ha funny man

 

[jaaba]

Yeah the concept of “wabi sabi” somewhat holds true but not in the way bluepilled copetards say

Wabi sabi would be the entire face being near perfect aside from one small non-failo-level flaw that could be considered charming

Example:

Rosie Huntington whitely has a near perfect face except for her nose which isn’t very close to the female ideal. This unique trait could be seen as “cute” but only because everything else is exceptionally attractive.

bluepillers missed the entire point, “a little off centre” doesn’t mean complete facial recession it means a slight flaw ( if it was entirely perfect it’d be better, but when things are mostly perfect flaws can gain some charm)