Should I add primo to my cycle and extend it to 24/28 weeks

redskull31

redskull31

Iron
Joined
Jun 26, 2024
Posts
15
Reputation
5
Currently I’ve been running 350mg test P + 6IU HGH for about 4 weeks, planning to run it for 20 weeks and gains have been great and strength is increasing like crazy. However I’ve noticed a lot of subcutaneous water retention which makes me look a lot rounder than I’d like so I’ve thought of adding 100mg primo a week, titrating up in 50mg increments each week until I reach 200mg which most likely will reduce my estrogen enough to minimise the water retention as well as risk of gyno (i’ll take a blood test to confirm this). I’ve experienced no signs of hair loss while on test so I think I’m genetically protected on that side. I’ll also probably take 20mg telmisartan a day to lower my BP and reduce some of the bloat I’m experiencing. Will this fix my problem?

I need to look my best around 8 weeks after my cycle ends at which I’ll end my lean bulk and enter a semi-aggressive cut where I think I’ll be using 150mg test and 100mg primo to taper down and improve my biomarkers as I’ll be drinking a lot in the summer. I’ll also add 20mg of Anavar a day for the 6 weeks leading up to when I need to look best supported with NAC and TUDCA to be sure my liver isn’t damaged and can handle some alcohol intake. Should I extend my blast past 20 weeks to ensure I maintain my muscle when cutting fat? Or would lowering the test down to a trt dose be preferable as it’d prevent having moon face?
 
primo isnt really a good comp to run, if youre in puberty you would be WAY better off just switching it for aromasin. it would prolong plate closure make you look drier and leaner and would save you hundreds across your cycle. you also would get less scar tissue since youre lowering your oil amount by a lot. primo also destroys your hair.

you shouldnt be drinking period

this is a pretty weak cycle, you could run this year round tbh except for the var.

if you want progress you have to stop caring about your current looks
 
primo isnt really a good comp to run, if youre in puberty you would be WAY better off just switching it for aromasin. it would prolong plate closure make you look drier and leaner and would save you hundreds across your cycle. you also would get less scar tissue since youre lowering your oil amount by a lot. primo also destroys your hair.

you shouldnt be drinking period

this is a pretty weak cycle, you could run this year round tbh except for the var.

if you want progress you have to stop caring about your current looks
Thanks for reply I’m 18 rn and haven’t grown for about 2 years so I’m not bothered about closing my plates since I’m 99% sure they’re already closed. I’m doing this solely for the muscular hypertrophy

I’m trying to prioritise growth rn and for the entire cycle hence the primo and I would increase the test to 500mg but I’m worried about the aging effects you usually see with guys on roid cycles. I don’t mind gaining fat in the meantime whilst getting big as I know that’s what I’m gonna have to do if I want to optimise muscle growth through a calorie surplus and it’ll mean I’ll look better in the long run so it’s worth it.

As for the drinking to be clear I hardly drink at all, maybe once every 2 months absolute max. It’s just that I want to look best for the summer when I’ll be going on a couple vacations with my friends and that’ll sort of force me to drink a bit. And by then I want to have gained muscle from the cycle and also cut as much of the fat as possible.

Do you think increasing the test up to 500mg would be a good idea? As I said I want to stay looking somewhat youthful and healthy rather than a hypertensive roided up ball of muscle
 

Similar threads

ThePrinceOfPersia
Replies
9
Views
115
JkCel
JkCel
acromegalic
Replies
5
Views
91
Zagro
Zagro
J
Replies
6
Views
77
BR32
BR32
03/29/2009
Replies
18
Views
107
03/29/2009
03/29/2009

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top