Should we introduct the Sub0 PSL rating?

D

Deleted member 2933

Kraken
Joined
Aug 24, 2019
Posts
8,379
Reputation
7,310
Who would fit in a Sub0 PSL rating? Like -1 -2 -3
 
Who would fit in a Sub0 PSL rating? Like -1 -2 -3
Some people just don't qualify for human ratings. Deformed, acid burnt people. They can't be rated on an human scale. So can't currycels. So yes, sub0 PSL is redundant (since dogs can't get a PSL rating).
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Ekeoma_The_BBC, About2Rope, Newguyaround and 4 others
Some people just don't qualify for human ratings. Deformed, acid burnt people. They can't be rated on an human scale. So can't currycels. So yes, sub0 PSL is redundant (since dogs can't get a PSL rating).

:feelsgood:
 
the disfigured and blackops2cels
 
the disfigured and blackops2cels
blackops2cel's best picture is like 2.75PSL tbh

0PSL means there is 0% chance of ever succeeding within the normal relationships game/sexual marketplace
 
blackops2cel's best picture is like 2.75PSL tbh

0PSL means there is 0% chance of ever succeeding within the normal relationships game/sexual marketplace
blackops is a virgin in his 30s

there is no chance of him whatsoever
 
What’s the max PSL?
 
blackops is a virgin in his 30s

there is no chance of him whatsoever
if he looksmaxed hard like a decade ago instead of playing black ops 2 all day I think he could have made it, like at least 25% of the guys with gfs in my country are as ugly as him
 
Below a 3 no girl is ever gonna want to sleep with you so you may as well be a 0 tbh
 
0 and below zero should be allowed, as there are people who don't even look like humans on a scale like this: It is hesitant to give 1/10 to some beings out there (not that attractive people cease to be beings ), but whatever
 

Similar threads

Leomorass
Replies
6
Views
194
anthony111553
anthony111553
MOGMASTER69
Replies
1
Views
84
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
Leomorass
Replies
97
Views
969
Leomorass
Leomorass
GigaAryenMaxxer
Replies
6
Views
177
Anth0ny
A
Timmy.
Replies
0
Views
31
Timmy.
Timmy.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top