Side of the Blackpill No One Talks About

[noka]

We all know that looks matter a lot in dating and social situations. People with less attractive appearances or cuck frame and short height often get treated worse. So, what can we do about this?

I've seen very few opinions on the topic. Should we stop letting sub4s reproduce to create a world where only the "ideal" features are valued? Or should we focus on making personality more important? Could teaching self-improvement in schools help?

Or is the blackpill mindset meant for individuals rather than society as a whole?

Many of these ideas might sound dumb or unrealistic, but I’m curious about what others think could be a solution.

Just sharing my thoughts, not trying to be hateful.

 

[Azr616]

Low IQ water thread. You must be new here

 

[Darkeningstar]

I think you're right, that is, changes would be welcome, but some changes need, even when effective, a long time. Very long time.

Example: when talking to a person, even about a topic in which he or she is interested, it probably takes hours for a cue to come up.

 

[noka]

Low IQ water thread. You must be new here

can you explain why? i think i wrote very good question

 

[ngannou]

Pray to Jesus Christ rely on him.

 

[Freixel]

There was already an attempt to create a world of "perfect" beings and the project failed: Germany NS

Furthermore, that would be throwing away the beloved brocels who created these spaces and the blackpill knowledge, that would be being ungrateful.

 

[Fusionxz]

I feel surgery and genetic engineering is our best bet since nazi Germany 2.0 would be impossible to implement now

 

[TAChipmunk]

Can we appreciate truly appreciate beauty without the ugly being present? I'd argue probably not, as our framework for deciding what is and what isn't, is relative to a benchmark. Spectra don't exist, we create our own spectra, as we have subordinated ourselves to create an ordinance for everything, so even if everyone was beautiful, we would still try to class what is beautiful and what is ugly, as humans are not Marxist in nature. Therefore, the self-improvement theory holds more substance.

The only reason I would choose eugenics is that beauty is usually a derivation of good health, and we can create a healthier society by creating a selection pressure to reproduce better-looking individuals. To counter the first point too, since beauty is an emergent property of many different things, one of those being biology, if we narrow down society to a point where only a set biology of certain physical traits is passed on, then biology becomes less of a factor in determining the attractiveness of someone {also as the effect of genetic recombination becomes weaker), and therefore the scale of beauty shrinks, thus more people have a chance in forming a relationship. I guess a counter-counterargument to that could be that this would limit genetic diversity, ironically antithetical to producing a healthier society, but I think as modern science goes, certain physical traits aren't linked to cofactors for the increased susceptibility of developing a certain type of diseases, e.g. if you have hunter eyes, you aren't more likely to get ebola.

Excluding sub4s from the gene pool could have disastrous consequences. These small ER-esque incel rampages are nothing compared to the impending doom of an already realised reality of a generation of entirely sexless, and sexually frustrated men. I'm not sure how much longer rising depression rates and increased loneliness can continue until such resentment hits like a bubble waiting to be burst, whereby civil war might ensue. I guess Japan is a good example to look to for the future, where prostitution, rental girlfriends, and state-sponsored pornography become the bandaids we think of given our time and budget constraints on the wider constraint of biology and hypergamy.

I believe a solution would be when the singularity nears us, is to have free female androids for sub4s, virtually indistinguishable from real females, for the purpose of companionship. By that time though, there is a possibility that we will be medically advanced enough to solve almost any problem we have, and be able to chadify ourselves under the knife, but due to the laws of physics, that seems more unfeasible than the former option.

 

[noka]

Can we appreciate truly appreciate beauty without the ugly being present? I'd argue probably not, as our framework for deciding what is and what isn't, is relative to a benchmark. Spectra don't exist, we create our own spectra, as we have subordinated ourselves to create an ordinance for everything, so even if everyone was beautiful, we would still try to class what is beautiful and what is ugly, as humans are not Marxist in nature. Therefore, the self-improvement theory holds more substance.

The only reason I would choose eugenics is that beauty is usually a derivation of good health, and we can create a healthier society by creating a selection pressure to reproduce better-looking individuals. To counter the first point too, since beauty is an emergent property of many different things, one of those being biology, if we narrow down society to a point where only a set biology of certain physical traits is passed on, then biology becomes less of a factor in determining the attractiveness of someone {also as the effect of genetic recombination becomes weaker), and therefore the scale of beauty shrinks, thus more people have a chance in forming a relationship. I guess a counter-counterargument to that could be that this would limit genetic diversity, ironically antithetical to producing a healthier society, but I think as modern science goes, certain physical traits aren't linked to cofactors for the increased susceptibility of developing a certain type of diseases, e.g. if you have hunter eyes, you aren't more likely to get ebola.

Excluding sub4s from the gene pool could have disastrous consequences. These small ER-esque incel rampages are nothing compared to the impending doom of an already realised reality of a generation of entirely sexless, and sexually frustrated men. I'm not sure how much longer rising depression rates and increased loneliness can continue until such resentment hits like a bubble waiting to be burst, whereby civil war might ensue. I guess Japan is a good example to look to for the future, where prostitution, rental girlfriends, and state-sponsored pornography become the bandaids we think of given our time and budget constraints on the wider constraint of biology and hypergamy.

I believe a solution would be when the singularity nears us, is to have free female androids for sub4s, virtually indistinguishable from real females, for the purpose of companionship. By that time though, there is a possibility that we will be medically advanced enough to solve almost any problem we have, and be able to chadify ourselves under the knife, but due to the laws of physics, that seems more unfeasible than the former option.

very good points, high IQ answer

 

[Acion]

Many of these ideas might sound dumb or unrealistic, but I’m curious about what others think could be a solution.

Just sharing my thoughts, not trying to be hateful.

I discovered the solution to the problem of inceldom

Greyscels, come here and learn how to get pussy one last time. I've spent 2 years teaching incels how to get pussy , but only a few were wise enough to listen. What I have to offer is better than the present options of Looksmaxing and geomaxing.

looksmax.org

Magick School

Here is some stuff from UncleSpertz What I would recommend for someone wanting to do magic and why Thread starterUncleSpertz Start dateWednesday at 4:35 AM First I would start off by doing meditations while chanting a black flame enn, the reason why is so that by doing so you start to...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 48024]

You're a bluecel who joined about a month ago. You know pretty much nothing about the BP