SMV to bodyfat chart

[Deleted member 22829]

@defezman
water thread btw

 

[Deleted member 19174]

why tf did you tag me?

 

[Deleted member 22829]

why tf did you tag me?

because your fatmaxxing

 

[Chinacurry]

It's wrong though, SMV peaks around 12-14%

 

[Deleted member 24235]

by this logic a 6 ft 110 pound man should have high smv because he has low bodyfat, even if underweight

 

[Deleted member 22829]

It's wrong though, SMV peaks around 12-14%

No, 10-12%, 14% you still wont be lean enough. 10% is hard to maintain though so 12% is best.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

by this logic a 6 ft 110 pound man should have high smv because he has low bodyfat, even if underweight

This graph is assuming you at a normal BMI. you can be lean and fat while still having a normal body mass index.

 

[Deleted member 25667]

This is retarded because you could be a skinny twig with no muscle and be 10% bf

 

[Deleted member 19453]

corrected

 

[Deleted member 22829]

View attachment 2085534
corrected

You're right honestly, 10% and 12% are basically the same, your chart is better.

 

[Deleted member 24235]

This graph is assuming you at a normal BMI. you can be lean and fat while still having a normal body mass index.

u didn't specify that

 

[thecel]

This is retarded because you could be a skinny twig with no muscle and be 10% bf

Your reply is retarded because it’s just a correlation and not a function.

You can make a lot more SMV graphs with other traits on the X axis, and all of the graphs would matter.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

This is retarded because you could be a skinny twig with no muscle and be 10% bf

as I said earlier this is assuming you have normal bmi and above average muscle mass.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

u didn't specify that

just be lean bro

 

[Deleted member 25667]

Your reply is retarded because it’s just a correlation and not a function.

You can make a lot more SMV graphs with other traits on the X axis, and all of the graphs would matter.

The correlation is wrong if you don't take other variables into account though

 

[Deleted member 22829]

The correlation is wrong if you don't take other variables into account though

I will update this graph.

 

[thecel]

The correlation is wrong if you don't take other variables into account though

Retarded

 

[Deleted member 22924]

View attachment 2085531

@defezman


water thread btw

I'm 20% and htn so probably not accurate

 

[Deleted member 24235]

just be lean bro

underweight ppl are lean

 

[thecel]

I'm 20% and htn so probably not accurate

This forum’s IQ is below sea level. Microsoft Sydney already has 114 IQ.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

Updated

 

[Deleted member 22924]

This forum’s IQ is below sea level. Microsoft Sydney already has 114 IQ.

i am a low iq cell

 

[Deleted member 25667]

Retarded

Elaborate. If we take a random sample of individuals and measure their smv and bf% it would most likely peak around 12-15% considering most people do not have "above average" muscle mass. 10%bf with no muscles has lower appeal/smv than 12-15%, remember overall size is important when taking appeal and smv into account

 

[thecel]

View attachment 2085538
Updated

Complete shit.

Why can’t someone just Google a study that has real data on this and post its graphs here?

Oh yea, it’s cus the studies show the literal opposite:

Research Proves Overweight People Have More Sex Than You

Eat up, fatty!

www.thrillist.com

 

[Deleted member 22829]

Elaborate. If we take a random sample of individuals and measure their smv and bf% it would most likely peak around 12-15% considering most people do not have "above average" muscle mass. 10%bf with no muscles has lower appeal/smv than 12-15%, remember overall size is important when taking appeal and smv into account

updated the thread

 

[Deleted member 19174]

because your fatmaxxing

No, I’m leanmaxxing rn

 

[Deleted member 22829]

Complete shit.

Why can’t someone just Google a study that has real data on this and post its graphs here?

most incels are too low iq to find it

 

[Deleted member 22829]

No, I’m leanmaxxing rn

Finally

 

[thecel]

most incels are too low iq to find it

Turns out the studies show the opposite:

Research Proves Overweight People Have More Sex Than You

Eat up, fatty!

www.thrillist.com

 

[Deleted member 22829]

Turns out the studies show the opposite:

Research Proves Overweight People Have More Sex Than You

Eat up, fatty!

www.thrillist.com

Dont listen to the soy studies, be realistic. do you really think a fatass would have more slays than a gymmaxed guy? dont forget bodyfat HEAVILY influences your face too.

 

[Deleted member 19174]

Finally

If this shit doesn’t work then I’m roping

 

[thecel]

Dont listen to the soy studies, be realistic. do you really think a fatass would have more slays than a gymmaxed guy? dont forget bodyfat HEAVILY influences your face too.

The studies reveal something that blackpillers never discuss.

The fact that lower-SMV people have more sexual activity.

Poor people and fat people have sex more than rich people (excluding the top 0.1%) and physically fit people have.

 

[User49]

Turns out the studies show the opposite:

Research Proves Overweight People Have More Sex Than You

Eat up, fatty!

www.thrillist.com

I’m not reading allat but dieting / caloric deficit has a significant impact on sex drive aswell which could be a factor

send some study on facial leanness and attraction correlation

 

[Deleted member 25667]

Complete shit.

Why can’t someone just Google a study that has real data on this and post its graphs here?

Oh yea, it’s cus the studies show the literal opposite:

Research Proves Overweight People Have More Sex Than You

Eat up, fatty!

www.thrillist.com

Turns out the studies show the opposite:

Research Proves Overweight People Have More Sex Than You

Eat up, fatty!

www.thrillist.com

Lifetime sex partners doesn't equate to smv tbhgnl

 

[Deleted member 22829]

The studies reveal something that blackpillers never discuss.

The fact that lower-SMV people have more sexual activity.

Poor people and fat people have sex more than rich people (excluding the top 0.1%) and physically fit people have.

This is complete bullshit and you know it.

WHO SLAYS MORE?

 

[Deleted member 25667]

This is complete bullshit and you know it.

WHO SLAYS MORE?

According to @thecel the second guy does because he dumpster dives with 300lb whales

 

[thecel]

This is complete bullshit and you know it.

WHO SLAYS MORE?

The 1st one slays more, but the 2nd one has more sex, from a sociologically level. At an individual level, the higher SMV the better.

People with lower socioeconomic status engage in degenerate behaviors more. Poor, fat, ugly people have more sex and more unprotected sex.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

The 1st one slays more, but the 2nd one has more sex, from a sociologically level. At an individual level, the higher SMV the better.

People with lower socioeconomic status engage in degenerate behaviors more. Poor, fat, ugly people have more sex and more unprotected sex.

WHAT?

ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?

SLAYS AND SEX IS THE SAME THING, MAKE UP YOUR MIND!

DIDNT READ THE REST BTW

 

[Deleted member 22829]

According to @thecel the second guy does because he dumpster dives with 300lb whales

hes braindead.

 

[Constantin Denis]

It's wrong though, SMV peaks around 12-14%

wrong it peaks at 10-12

 

[thecel]

WHAT?

ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?

SLAYS AND SEX IS THE SAME THING, MAKE UP YOUR MIND!

DIDNT READ THE REST BTW

A “slay” is the same as a “lay” is the same as “an occurrence of sex”.

Slaying is going out to bars, clubs, parties and hooking up with women there. It’s not the same as just getting laid. Having sex with your girlfriend is not slaying.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

A “slay” is the same as a “lay” is the same as “an occurrence of sex”.

Slaying is going out to bars, clubs, parties and hooking up with women there. It’s not the same as just getting laid. Having sex with your girlfriend is not slaying.

WHO DO YOU THINK IS MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A GIRLFRIEND..

 

[User49]

i

WHO DO YOU THINK IS MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A GIRLFRIEND..

i don’t think u get the point son

 

[Deleted member 22829]

im a stinky pajeet coper

 

[thecel]

WHO DO YOU THINK IS MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A GIRLFRIEND..

The 1st one is more likely to have a girlfriend in a given moment, because he doesn’t slay. The 2nd one doesn’t need a girlfriend just to get sex; he does hundreds of casual hookups per year.

The 2nd one is more likely to have a higher number of girlfriends in his lifetime.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

The 1st one is more likely to have a girlfriend in a given moment, because he doesn’t slay. The 2nd one doesn’t need a girlfriend just to get sex; he does hundreds of casual hookups per year.

The 2nd one is more likely to have a higher number of girlfriends in his lifetime.

keep coping incel, if you want sex, then put down the fork you fat shit.

 

[Wallenberg]

@thecel explain yourself

 

[Deleted member 22829]

@thecel explain yourself

jfl at @thecel

he's trying to argue that fat people have higher smv than lean people @thecel on suicide watch @LastTemp W @defezman tagging because you're fat Original thread https://looksmax.org/threads/smv-to-bodyfat-chart.667677/#post-10597377

looksmax.org

 

[thecel]

keep coping incel, if you want sex, then put down the fork you fat shit.

I agree.

But you, a low-IQ brainlet, can’t make the distinction between micro and macro. Dumb fuck.

 

[Deleted member 22829]

I agree.

But you, a low-IQ brainlet, can’t make the distinction between micro and macro. Dumb fuck.

MY FRIEND...

YOU ARE TRYING TO JUSTIFY BEING A FAT SHIT BECAUSE "MORE SEX"


ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID? YOU CALL ME LOW IQ WHEN YOUR IQ LEVELS ARE BEING MOGGED BY THE SEA LEVEL! WHAT THE FUCK??