![billymidnight](/data/avatars/l/70/70662.jpg?1722809709)
billymidnight
🇲🇽
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2024
- Posts
- 1,740
- Reputation
- 1,668
“Im never settling for less than a handsome 6’4 man with money”- ugly , recessed flat feminist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
what a time to be a handsome 6'4 man with money“Im never settling for less than a handsome 6’4 man with money”- ugly , recessed flat feminist
Well done now you just about attracted the flat recessed ugly girl.what a time to be a handsome 6'4 man with money
Sentence doesn’t make sense , incel194012940so the average guy? go outside moron real life is not the discord selfies channel lul
there are no stats showing men despise women with hip dips, there are stats that show women despise manletsNobody fucking said that. Height is not important for women, dude. Its like women who think men care about their hip dips - "yeah bro she totally wants me to be 6'4, 5'11 is a manlet height!!"
Meanwhile women are out there dating average height guys
yeah i reported that user for being a foid infiltrator lulthere are no stats showing men despise women with hip dips, there are stats that show women despise manlets
There are no stats demonstrating that height matters in the way OP is describing it. No woman out there wants exclusively a top 1% height man.there are no stats showing men despise women with hip dips, there are stats that show women despise manlets
There are no stats demonstrating that height matters in the way OP is describing it. No woman out there wants exclusively a top 1% height man.
Most stats show that height has a tiny effect on SMV, actually. 6'3-6'4 only gets you 64% more matches than being 5'5-5'6. And nobody ever mentions how women are also affected by height, being tall reduces matches for women, by HALF!
View attachment 3055272
Okay, and i doubt 90% of men are getting rejected unless they're 5'4 or underI doubt that 50% if the girl in question is not above 6ft
And its 90% of women rejecting you at 5'4 and 50% at 5'8 (close to average height in america)
Are you retarded? that is littarly what the stat says meanwhile I said I doubt it if a certain numerical condition was fulfilledOkay, and i doubt 90% of men are getting rejected unless they're 5'4 or under
Yes a dating appRejecting you where? How was this measured? On dating apps your matches drop by ~50% at 5'4 compared to 5'8.
It was satirical, since you were trying to dismiss the effects of female height failoAre you retarded? that is littarly what the stat says meanwhile I said I doubt it if a certain numerical condition was fulfilled
Filters aren't a good way to assess this, if there's a filter for height specifically, then ofc women would use it. But IRL and on other dating apps, filtering isn't focused on height, as my chart shows (which you ignored). The way you know this is because of the hilarious drop in percentages between 6'0 and 5'11.Yes a dating app
![]()
![]()
Then bios are the next best thing and wow, it says 6ft is the number one word for these profilesFilters aren't a good way to assess this, if there's a filter for height specifically
Its completely over for IRL approaching and dating apps are now the majority way people meet in 2024But IRL
Thats kinda a fucking lot when you consider 63% of men aged 18-30 are single in America. And that graph just shows 5'9/5'10 is the bare minimum (agreed upon most people here) and below that is extreme difficulty. Height is not below 6'4 over but over below average by a lotYour avg 6'4 chad only gets 64% more slays than a 5'6 guy,
Its not the next best thing. The next best thing is matches, which is where we see the small effect of height. I need you to stop ignoring this chart:Then bios are the next best thing and wow, it says 6ft is the number one word for these profiles
Its completely over for IRL approaching and dating apps are now the majority way people meet in 2024
And your screenshot might as well be faked. No source
And that graph just shows 5'9/5'10 is the bare minimum (agreed upon most people here) and below that is extreme difficulty. Height is not below 6'4 over but over below average by a lot
These are the best words to include in your dating profile, according to eHarmony
A new study reveals the 10 words used in dating profiles for men and women that get the most
Its the same source. They're talking about the same pew research survey. And its not "another" one, since your first one was based on a shitty sample of 60 people, shown to be incorrect by other sources (proper ones)another source showing how couples met mostly online in America
and another![]()
My graph doesn't show anything like that. Get your eyes checkedAnd that graph just shows 5'9/5'10 is the bare minimum (agreed upon most people here) and below that is extreme difficulty.
Theres no stat there, its a list of words on bumble, where we already know a height filter exists. Theyre passing the height filter, its not even "the next best way" as you said it. Its the same thing. And i explained why its extremely biased and should be ignoredstat on the top word being 6ft
I pasted the wrong stat look againheres no stat there, its a list of words on bumble
I said majority which the graph tells me is rightThank you for linking me this survey which shows meeting people IRL in various ways is still common even among zoomers:
![]()
All
you arent proving anything but the fact that your cherrypicking when it suits youpieces of proof while im tearing your to shreds
Nigga there's nothing about height in that article you linked, you just linked me an unrelated article that listed a bunch of non-looks traits as being attractive
View attachment 3055346
Its the same source. They're talking about the same pew research survey. And its not "another" one, since your first one was based on a shitty sample of 60 people, shown to be incorrect by other sources (proper ones)
Thank you for linking me this survey which shows meeting people IRL in various ways is still common even among zoomers:
View attachment 3055338
And i want you to acknowledge the one i also linked, stop ignoring my pieces of proof while im tearing your to shreds
View attachment 3055341
I just found another one:
View attachment 3055344
My graph doesn't show anything like that. Get your eyes checked
The graph isnt telling you that, ignoramus. Theres no "majority" on your graph and its multiple-choice. The IRL ways to meet add up to a higher percentage.I said majority which the graph tells me is right![]()
Wrong. I've given you more pieces of proof and addressed all of yours. You've been ignoring mine and giving me shoddy sources (which i explained, were incorrect)you arent proving anything but the fact that your cherrypicking when it suits you
My stats arent outdated, your stats from 2024 show people still meet IRL. Online is just a more broad group, try aggregating all IRL ways and you'd see most people meet IRL nowadays.your stats are outdated, if I search up how most couples meet in 2024 it littarly says online right there.
I don't care about anecdotes, and i can find you just as many anecdotes from short men saying the opposite. Youre not turning anything over.And the actual anecdotes from short men and not bluepilled faggots such as yourself turn this "argument" on its head
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.0211 https://humboldt-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/2148/624/ThesisFinal.pdf![]()
Interactions between height and shoulder‑to‑hip ratio influence women's perceptions of men's attractiveness and masculinity
Heterosexual women prefer men who are taller and have broader shoulders, and consider them more masculine and better in fighting ability, according to new research published in Archives of Sexual Behavior. Additionally, while larger upper bodies boost attractive ratings for taller men, they...www.psypost.orgPage Cannot be Found![]()
Tall men get married earlier, but short men stay married
Height has a substantial effect on career earnings, though researchers are split on whether that’s because tall people are implicitly attractive or whether height signals early nutrition and health. It also has an effect on coupling up, impacting not only who people choose to marry, but also the...qz.com
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1570677X10000754 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691530060X?via%3Dihub https://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/online_dating_feb2005.pdf
not even a pixel bro, you cannot convince me my reality is somehow wrong because of clearly biased faggot with a 1:20 stat ratio of proving me wrong vs me proving you wrongThe graph isnt telling you that, ignoramus. Theres no "majority" on your graph and its multiple-choice. The IRL ways to meet add up to a higher percentage.
Wrong. I've given you more pieces of proof and addressed all of yours. You've been ignoring mine and giving me shoddy sources (which i explained, were incorrect)
My stats arent outdated, your stats from 2024 show people still meet IRL. Online is just a more broad group, try aggregating all IRL ways and you'd see most people meet IRL nowadays.
I don't care about anecdotes, and i can find you just as many anecdotes from short men saying the opposite. Youre not turning anything over.
You can spam shit you've never read all you want, it's not gonna make you more correct. One of your sources is mostly concerned with interethnic marriage, two others only make vague statements like "Height is correlated with attractiveness in men" which i never denied, one is about number of children which is completely irrelevant. I'm saying the effect is small.
Either quote relevant shit or get out. I dont have time for incel youtube videos and reddit posts.
I only posts concise, easy to read charts, i dont bombard you with links that happen to turn out irrelevant after closer inspection.
You made up your mind on reality based on incorrect information. Im not biased, you're biased when you keep linking me shit youve never read (because you never looked into this before this argument)not even a pixel bro, you cannot convince me my reality is somehow wrong because of clearly biased faggot with a 1:20 stat ratio of proving me wrong vs me proving you wrong
Dnr a single molecule, you can keep typing when every one even normies have accepted height is one of the most important things for dating in 2024, short guys agree, women agree and doubtful normies can cope when the two parties involved actions speak louder than wordsI need you to quote me where it shows an extreme statistical effect of height, which differs from the one i showed you. Until then, you stay defeated in the face of truth.
"Normies" haven't accepted that, normies dont talk about height like you incels do. And normies would have a level-headed take on it, that it matters, but isnt extreme.Dnr a single molecule, you can keep typing when every one even normies have accepted height is one of the most important things for dating in 2024, short guys agree, women agree and doubtful normies can cope when the two parties involved actions speak louder than words
I smell a foid. Your comment smells like fish. Like vagina.Nobody fucking said that. Height is not important for women, dude. Its like women who think men care about their hip dips - "yeah bro she totally wants me to be 6'4, 5'11 is a manlet height!!"
Meanwhile women are out there dating average height guys
This. Girls who are that chad-hungry always end up old and alone, or settled with an oofy doofy, or end up roping. Few will actually get chadWho cares. Vast majority of them won't get that and will be forced to settle anyways
"You incels""Normies" haven't accepted that, normies dont talk about height like you incels do. And normies would have a level-headed take on it, that it matters, but isnt extreme.
tbh kinda cope. Even if a girl is 6ft, there's still a shit ton dudes that like that and they're still gonna have a ton of options still.how women are also affected by height, being tall reduces matches for women, by HALF!