Somatotypes only matter when...

D

Deleted member 1660

Diamond
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Posts
1,381
Reputation
2,252
Your body is fully developed and grown (up to 30)

This was eddie hall at 13
1659636174192


This is him now:
1659636250764





Somatotypes are at the end of the day, over-simpistic, and somewhat arbitrary characterizations of body types. For starters, a lot of the measurements used to classify the somatotypes are not entirely genetics-dependent, e.g. bicep circumference.

If someone who starts out as an "ectomorph" can decides to train bodybuilding style and eat surplus calories for decades and achieve a seriously impressive bicep (along with other measurements like calf size), does he now become a mesomorph? Then, at least the way somatotypes are commonly referred to as a genetic trait is misguided.

To classify a truly genetics-dependent body type, only factors that are genetically dependent, largely immutable, non-training-stimulus-dependent should be considered - e.g. wrist / ankle circumference, bone density, dimensions of the ribcage (ratio length vs. width), ratio of type 1 vs type 2 muscle fibers, the amount of fat cells you have, hormonal profile, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20565 and Deleted member 15827
+ to add the reason why many use the ecto excuse for lack of progress dont understand that muscle is a lot harder to build from nothing rather than if you had already built the muscle before and re-attain it via muscle memory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1660
Eddie Hall looked better at 13 lmao.
Roidcopers on suicide watch.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr.Proper and Deleted member 15827
Your body is fully developed and grown (up to 30)

This was eddie hall at 13
View attachment 1808857

This is him now:
View attachment 1808858




Somatotypes are at the end of the day, over-simpistic, and somewhat arbitrary characterizations of body types. For starters, a lot of the measurements used to classify the somatotypes are not entirely genetics-dependent, e.g. bicep circumference.

If someone who starts out as an "ectomorph" can decides to train bodybuilding style and eat surplus calories for decades and achieve a seriously impressive bicep (along with other measurements like calf size), does he now become a mesomorph? Then, at least the way somatotypes are commonly referred to as a genetic trait is misguided.

To classify a truly genetics-dependent body type, only factors that are genetically dependent, largely immutable, non-training-stimulus-dependent should be considered - e.g. wrist / ankle circumference, bone density, dimensions of the ribcage (ratio length vs. width), ratio of type 1 vs type 2 muscle fibers, the amount of fat cells you have, hormonal profile, etc.
Wtf he used to be a hairline mogger
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
36
Views
5K
Deleted member 24712
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top