Some people are subhuman in pictures but GL IRL

[uksucks]

Saw a study by qoves, might link it where it had women rate men's looks in photos and then IRL in motion

Some men were 6 IRL which is decent, probably HTN level since women rate men low. The same guys were rated as a 3 in pictures.

 

[Sceptical]

6 is barely above average

 

[uksucks]

6 is barely above average

Women rating men

They barely rate anyone above that in the study, 8 is like chad tier

Real average is like 4.5

 

[registerfasterusing]

Saw a study by qoves, might link it where it had women rate men's looks in photos and then IRL in motion

Some men were 6 IRL which is decent, probably HTN level since women rate men low. The same guys were rated as a 3 in pictures.

Depends what kinda photos but yeah that makes sense tbh

 

[Wexilarious]

Ofc because fov in cameras is shit

 

[uksucks]

Ofc because fov in cameras is shit

I mean it's a scatter plot, most are equal in pics and IRL, some better in pics by a lot, some a lot worse

 

[scout1]

Saw a study by qoves, might link it where it had women rate men's looks in photos and then IRL in motion

Some men were 6 IRL which is decent, probably HTN level since women rate men low. The same guys were rated as a 3 in pictures.

foids rate me 7-8 all the time bro but obviously none of them will date me