Status is cope

D

Deleted member 20704

Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Posts
1,484
Reputation
2,378
Imagine some bloated, fat, ugly landlord, store manager, country club executive, etc. who looks like this:

Brian_Baumgartner_LF.JPG


Now imagine some broke, weirdo who looks like this:

maxresdefault.jpg


Who do you think would get free, easy sex more? Which would have more options, more halo effect, more fun in life considering the status difference? One has lots of money, more pull, etc. A landlord certainly has more financial power, but will he suddenly be a slayer?

Inb4 "muh muh you gotta be a bajillionaire household name or status is cope" LMAO if that is "status" then congrats, less than 0.001% of men have it then. So better swallow the cope and realize that if "high status men" means what not even 1 in 1,000,000 men will be, what's the point of considering it? How is it realistic at all to say "a billionaire mogs broke Chad" when almost NOBODY is a billionaire?! It's a dumb comparison. A super rich, super celeb dude is gonna be many times more rare than just a reasonably gl dude IRL so it's not realistic.

Chad is more common than billionaire. Chadlite is many times more common than famous actor, musician, rich man/elite CEO, etc. It's cope to think some notable sense of status in the realm of NORMALCY is gonna get you puss ... Managers can still be incel or cucks/beta at best; business guys can be incel if ugly too. A nigga can have more money and more "power" but still be incel AF IRL vs. broke Chadlite+ looks.

If what constitutes "status" is rich and famous household name then that's like saying "just become a worldwide celebrity" instead of "become better looking." Which sounds more ridiculous and non-straightforward? Looksmaxxing can be straightforward, but becoming a mega status symbol certainly IS NOT. It is AUTISM to say status matters and use like a 0.000000001% example of such LOL GET REAL NIGGA

Me waiting on the copes/DNR/etc. posts like:

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ArcticStorm, Deleted member 23778, Gaia262 and 5 others
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22126
Make a good thread for once
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mogging, Deleted member 20704 and RIPPED IRL
didn't read but you're right
 
  • +1
Reactions: ArcticStorm and Deleted member 20704
that is not what status is
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: TeenAscender and Deleted member 20704
as long as you do the bare minimum you're fine

= active on insta/snap, have a social circle.
 
Yup Ed sheran definitely didn’t benefit from status at all
 
  • +1
Reactions: HeightPilledum and Deleted member 22126
Yup Ed sheran definitely didn’t benefit from status at all
The weeknd literally fucked bella hadid but he would have been called ltn and would be over cause ethnic
 
  • +1
Reactions: HeightPilledum and Deleted member 22780
The weeknd literally fucked bella hadid but he would have been called ltn and would be over cause ethnic
He’s also 5’6 jfl. Status is legit
 
  • +1
Reactions: HeightPilledum and Deleted member 22126
Why does status is positive correlated to bloated,ugly and fat individual?
In fact ironically Chico mogs in status cuz of his looks, he was a super model and could igmaxxing to 1M+ followers in his prime
Another example is Gandy
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
Keep writing essays bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS, Xangsane and Deleted member 20704
He’s also 5’6 jfl. Status is legit
Celebs fuck celebs it is proximity theory brah

How does any of that prove status is legit? Who here is gonna be Ed fucking Sheeran? LOL cope harder

Ed Sheeran also doesn't use his status to fuck normie Becky strangers anyways, he fucks celebs who he is NT and in proximity with.

It is much like a restaurant manager fucks another restaurant manager because they work and hang out together AKA LTRmaxxing

All guys with muh status aren't slaying either, willingly or not

It is easier to be Chad than to go from nobody to celebrity household name.

And anythibg less than that barely benefits from low grade status especially if sub 6
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: HeightPilledum, IMZLEGEND and Artemis
The problem is you all look at some uggo who is famous and say "status is legit"

How is that any different than saying "NT is legit" in some context? For WHOM?

It is about the big picture not particular contexts in isolation

If you gotta be a mega celeb for status to kick in then it is many times more ridiculous than feasibly looksmaxxing from a LTN to a HTN+ ecen with the same status

Therefore status is more retarded concept than looksmaxxing

Plus celebs hang out with celeb you might as well just call that being NT or social circle theory than status.

After all it is fucking people in their league

It is like a 4/10 normie dating a Becky he works with at Burger King cuz "NT"

If celebs will fuck celebs than where in the big picture did status matter if they are all celebs and in prozimity anyways? It ain't like Ed Sheeran admitted he was incel before he waa famous did he? Same with other dudes called "subhuman" here who weren't necessarily incel even prior to household fame.

Keep copin niggaz
 
What a dumb comparison. Dude, imagine being this 1/10. It would actually be better being this 1 in a billion Chad. Wow. Groundbreaking stuff.

Dude, looks are cope, because imagine being 4'9 wheelchair bound literal midget with Chico face compared to 6'4 athlete with warrior skull but MTN face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender
1- You're picking 2 extremes for example

2- Don't need to be billionarie to have status, many other people have

3- Don't need to have global status, but local status can be enough in local situations. For example, in neighbourhood you're a big celebrity for whatever reason, outside it nobody knows you. Ok, if you go outside you lose your status, but still you can have easily girls from the neighbourhood

Saying all of that, of course being good looking will help you a lot, the more good looking you are the more your status will stand out
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender
Imagine some bloated, fat, ugly landlord, store manager, country club executive, etc. who looks like this:

Brian_Baumgartner_LF.JPG


Now imagine some broke, weirdo who looks like this:

maxresdefault.jpg


Who do you think would get free, easy sex more? Which would have more options, more halo effect, more fun in life considering the status difference? One has lots of money, more pull, etc. A landlord certainly has more financial power, but will he suddenly be a slayer?

Inb4 "muh muh you gotta be a bajillionaire household name or status is cope" LMAO if that is "status" then congrats, less than 0.001% of men have it then. So better swallow the cope and realize that if "high status men" means what not even 1 in 1,000,000 men will be, what's the point of considering it? How is it realistic at all to say "a billionaire mogs broke Chad" when almost NOBODY is a billionaire?! It's a dumb comparison. A super rich, super celeb dude is gonna be many times more rare than just a reasonably gl dude IRL so it's not realistic.

Chad is more common than billionaire. Chadlite is many times more common than famous actor, musician, rich man/elite CEO, etc. It's cope to think some notable sense of status in the realm of NORMALCY is gonna get you puss ... Managers can still be incel or cucks/beta at best; business guys can be incel if ugly too. A nigga can have more money and more "power" but still be incel AF IRL vs. broke Chadlite+ looks.

If what constitutes "status" is rich and famous household name then that's like saying "just become a worldwide celebrity" instead of "become better looking." Which sounds more ridiculous and non-straightforward? Looksmaxxing can be straightforward, but becoming a mega status symbol certainly IS NOT. It is AUTISM to say status matters and use like a 0.000000001% example of such LOL GET REAL NIGGA

Me waiting on the copes/DNR/etc. posts like:

giphy.gif
Dn'rd.

Your first status-maxxed subhuman will have 100x pussy than Chico no question. You are just a Zoomer retard if you think otherwise :feelsokman:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
this isnt status

status is being a pro athlete/CEO/musician/brotherhood leader/social media influencer not being a fucking landlord or country club owner where u just hang around old people

REAL status is what is extremely important, that + NT can allow any MTN+ to have a fulfilling life
 
  • +1
Reactions: mogger797 and looksseg
that is not what status is
this guy thinks status is being a fuckin landlord when it really should be when your in any position of influence respected by other people of your age demographic.

And its not just top 0.0001% of ppl who have status that differntiates that, a big example of status more accesible to the above avg person is joining a top frat in college which is an example of status that doesnt require being part of the top 0.0001%
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksseg, Deleted member 22126 and PURE ARYAN GENETICS
I literally got laid from being a niche microcelebrity on Facebook.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
What's even worse is some here correlate looks with status, so the two concepts can't even be separated and assessed adequately.

Also, you use famous guy examples having sex with the same people in their social circle but you also use non-famous normies having sex with girls in their circles but you don't call that "status" you call it "NT" yet it's the same thing, just a different social ranking basically

I'm not saying being a liked, popular guy isn't a halo...

But you fuckers think things autistically and not in a clear and sensible way IRL according to averages, norms and realistic causalities. Of course a not so gl dude can have sex if he's in the same circle with "hot" females just as popular. Of course gl famous guys get laid. LOL does anyone even need to ask how or why? The statement answers itself. It's asking to what end status is gonna supposedly enhance the sex appeal of an otherwise NON-SEXUAL guy. Sheeran has lots of fans and he has an oofy/cute beta look so some girls will want him, duh -- but that's still looks too.

You all act as if status alone is some trait that makes a huge difference when looks intertwine with it for most guys still.

But it's understandable ... Ugly niggas gotta cope ... Autists gotta cope ... They gotta see that "one for all" pull that "makes the difference" even tho lots of high status guys are also decent looking + fuck in their circle so it's a moot point overall regarding sex appeal broadly. If it's sex appeal you gotta show an ugly freak who suddenly "got popular" and then can have free sex with the same girls who rejected him prior to him becoming famous. Also can't have to do with money, so hookers are cope. Gotta be legit!
 
Last edited:
Exactly

@HarrierDuBois
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
  • +1
Reactions: ArcticStorm

Similar threads

NormieKilla
Replies
5
Views
91
NormieKilla
NormieKilla
vratisevojvodo
Replies
12
Views
404
halloweed
halloweed
J
Replies
9
Views
291
xantrooper
xantrooper
Growth Plate
Replies
2
Views
108
Growth Plate
Growth Plate

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top