D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,378
Imagine some bloated, fat, ugly landlord, store manager, country club executive, etc. who looks like this:
Now imagine some broke, weirdo who looks like this:
Who do you think would get free, easy sex more? Which would have more options, more halo effect, more fun in life considering the status difference? One has lots of money, more pull, etc. A landlord certainly has more financial power, but will he suddenly be a slayer?
Inb4 "muh muh you gotta be a bajillionaire household name or status is cope" LMAO if that is "status" then congrats, less than 0.001% of men have it then. So better swallow the cope and realize that if "high status men" means what not even 1 in 1,000,000 men will be, what's the point of considering it? How is it realistic at all to say "a billionaire mogs broke Chad" when almost NOBODY is a billionaire?! It's a dumb comparison. A super rich, super celeb dude is gonna be many times more rare than just a reasonably gl dude IRL so it's not realistic.
Chad is more common than billionaire. Chadlite is many times more common than famous actor, musician, rich man/elite CEO, etc. It's cope to think some notable sense of status in the realm of NORMALCY is gonna get you puss ... Managers can still be incel or cucks/beta at best; business guys can be incel if ugly too. A nigga can have more money and more "power" but still be incel AF IRL vs. broke Chadlite+ looks.
If what constitutes "status" is rich and famous household name then that's like saying "just become a worldwide celebrity" instead of "become better looking." Which sounds more ridiculous and non-straightforward? Looksmaxxing can be straightforward, but becoming a mega status symbol certainly IS NOT. It is AUTISM to say status matters and use like a 0.000000001% example of such LOL GET REAL NIGGA
Me waiting on the copes/DNR/etc. posts like:
Now imagine some broke, weirdo who looks like this:
Who do you think would get free, easy sex more? Which would have more options, more halo effect, more fun in life considering the status difference? One has lots of money, more pull, etc. A landlord certainly has more financial power, but will he suddenly be a slayer?
Inb4 "muh muh you gotta be a bajillionaire household name or status is cope" LMAO if that is "status" then congrats, less than 0.001% of men have it then. So better swallow the cope and realize that if "high status men" means what not even 1 in 1,000,000 men will be, what's the point of considering it? How is it realistic at all to say "a billionaire mogs broke Chad" when almost NOBODY is a billionaire?! It's a dumb comparison. A super rich, super celeb dude is gonna be many times more rare than just a reasonably gl dude IRL so it's not realistic.
Chad is more common than billionaire. Chadlite is many times more common than famous actor, musician, rich man/elite CEO, etc. It's cope to think some notable sense of status in the realm of NORMALCY is gonna get you puss ... Managers can still be incel or cucks/beta at best; business guys can be incel if ugly too. A nigga can have more money and more "power" but still be incel AF IRL vs. broke Chadlite+ looks.
If what constitutes "status" is rich and famous household name then that's like saying "just become a worldwide celebrity" instead of "become better looking." Which sounds more ridiculous and non-straightforward? Looksmaxxing can be straightforward, but becoming a mega status symbol certainly IS NOT. It is AUTISM to say status matters and use like a 0.000000001% example of such LOL GET REAL NIGGA
Me waiting on the copes/DNR/etc. posts like:
Last edited: