extraz
Science Based Looksmaxer
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2024
- Posts
- 34
- Reputation
- 60
There's been a lot of talk about how aromatase inhibitors "can't stop local aromatization in the growth plates", and to me this brings up the concern about using AAS during development. I'm using anabolics during development to maximize my frame, physique, and facial growth.
I'm opening this thread to let (High IQ, Educated users) debate on the topic of using AI's + Androgens + HGH on development.
This is what the average AAS user does and suggest I do (BB forum users suggests cycles like this):
Option 1: Blast 500 mg test → cruise 280mg test (i would be running 10iu GH daily during the duration of the entire cycle for height gains)
This is what a user on here suggested I do to maximize my bone growth + height
Option 2: Blast 200mg test + 100mg tren → cruise 100mg test + low dose tren + 10iu GH daily.
Their Thought Process: Lower test in Option #2 = less estrogen/aromatization, and tren's non-aromatizing + gives stronger androgenic benefits. Thoughts?
Can using a lower dose of testosterone contribute to a taller final adult height? And can combining this with more potent androgens like tren be beneficial to your face, frame, and physique more than a traditional steroid cycle? This debate to me opens up a new way of thinking when it comes to FULLY maximizing development while utilizing pharmacology.
Maybe I'm an idiot or this makes no sense, or this is already water, let me know your thoughts.
Don't reply to this thread if you're a clavicular meat sucker running your shitty 280 mg of Test Propionate. Test is NOT best there are way better ways to use pharmacology.
I'm opening this thread to let (High IQ, Educated users) debate on the topic of using AI's + Androgens + HGH on development.
This is what the average AAS user does and suggest I do (BB forum users suggests cycles like this):
Option 1: Blast 500 mg test → cruise 280mg test (i would be running 10iu GH daily during the duration of the entire cycle for height gains)
This is what a user on here suggested I do to maximize my bone growth + height
Option 2: Blast 200mg test + 100mg tren → cruise 100mg test + low dose tren + 10iu GH daily.
Their Thought Process: Lower test in Option #2 = less estrogen/aromatization, and tren's non-aromatizing + gives stronger androgenic benefits. Thoughts?
Can using a lower dose of testosterone contribute to a taller final adult height? And can combining this with more potent androgens like tren be beneficial to your face, frame, and physique more than a traditional steroid cycle? This debate to me opens up a new way of thinking when it comes to FULLY maximizing development while utilizing pharmacology.
Maybe I'm an idiot or this makes no sense, or this is already water, let me know your thoughts.
Don't reply to this thread if you're a clavicular meat sucker running your shitty 280 mg of Test Propionate. Test is NOT best there are way better ways to use pharmacology.
