Steroid Usage on Height : A Debate

[extraz]

There's been a lot of talk about how aromatase inhibitors "can't stop local aromatization in the growth plates", and to me this brings up the concern about using AAS during development. I'm using anabolics during development to maximize my frame, physique, and facial growth.

I'm opening this thread to let (High IQ, Educated users) debate on the topic of using AI's + Androgens + HGH on development.
This is what the average AAS user does and suggest I do (BB forum users suggests cycles like this):
Option 1: Blast 500 mg test → cruise 280mg test (i would be running 10iu GH daily during the duration of the entire cycle for height gains)
This is what a user on here suggested I do to maximize my bone growth + height
Option 2: Blast 200mg test + 100mg tren → cruise 100mg test + low dose tren + 10iu GH daily.
Their Thought Process: Lower test in Option #2 = less estrogen/aromatization, and tren's non-aromatizing + gives stronger androgenic benefits. Thoughts?

Can using a lower dose of testosterone contribute to a taller final adult height? And can combining this with more potent androgens like tren be beneficial to your face, frame, and physique more than a traditional steroid cycle? This debate to me opens up a new way of thinking when it comes to FULLY maximizing development while utilizing pharmacology.

Maybe I'm an idiot or this makes no sense, or this is already water, let me know your thoughts.
Don't reply to this thread if you're a clavicular meat sucker running your shitty 280 mg of Test Propionate. Test is NOT best there are way better ways to use pharmacology.

 

[Bryce]

Thank you science based looksmaxer

 

[Grievous]

I'm opening this thread to let (High IQ, Educated users) debate on the topic of using AI's + Androgens + HGH on development.

ain't no one using this lil nigga

 

[extraz]

ain't no one using this lil nigga

 

[extraz]

Thank you science based looksmaxer

ofc

 

[exsttttt]

There's been a lot of talk about how aromatase inhibitors "can't stop local aromatization in the growth plates", and to me this brings up the concern about using AAS during development. I'm using anabolics during development to maximize my frame, physique, and facial growth.

I'm opening this thread to let (High IQ, Educated users) debate on the topic of using AI's + Androgens + HGH on development.
This is what the average AAS user does and suggest I do (BB forum users suggests cycles like this):
Option 1: Blast 500 mg test → cruise 280mg test (i would be running 10iu GH daily during the duration of the entire cycle for height gains)
This is what a user on here suggested I do to maximize my bone growth + height
Option 2: Blast 200mg test + 100mg tren → cruise 100mg test + low dose tren + 10iu GH daily.
Their Thought Process: Lower test in Option #2 = less estrogen/aromatization, and tren's non-aromatizing + gives stronger androgenic benefits. Thoughts?

Can using a lower dose of testosterone contribute to a taller final adult height? And can combining this with more potent androgens like tren be beneficial to your face, frame, and physique more than a traditional steroid cycle? This debate to me opens up a new way of thinking when it comes to FULLY maximizing development while utilizing pharmacology.

Maybe I'm an idiot or this makes no sense, or this is already water, let me know your thoughts.
Don't reply to this thread if you're a clavicular meat sucker running your shitty 280 mg of Test Propionate. Test is NOT best there are way better ways to use pharmacology.

tren would accelerate bone age way more than test would, its very retarded if you wanna maximize height to use tren, and aromatase inhibs DO penetrate the growth plates and inhibit aromatization there aswell, if it didnt it wouldnt be used as a line of treatement combined with gh for ISS. also local aromatization contributes a signficant proportion to fusion but peripheral aromatization also plays role.

 

[extraz]

tren would accelerate bone age way more than test would, its very retarded if you wanna maximize height to use tren, and aromatase inhibs DO penetrate the growth plates and inhibit aromatization there aswell, if it didnt it wouldnt be used as a line of treatement combined with gh for ISS. also local aromatization contributes a signficant proportion to fusion but peripheral aromatization also plays role.

good point on AI's, well said

 

[Brava]

There's been a lot of talk about how aromatase inhibitors "can't stop local aromatization in the growth plates", and to me this brings up the concern about using AAS during development. I'm using anabolics during development to maximize my frame, physique, and facial growth.

I'm opening this thread to let (High IQ, Educated users) debate on the topic of using AI's + Androgens + HGH on development.
This is what the average AAS user does and suggest I do (BB forum users suggests cycles like this):
Option 1: Blast 500 mg test → cruise 280mg test (i would be running 10iu GH daily during the duration of the entire cycle for height gains)
This is what a user on here suggested I do to maximize my bone growth + height
Option 2: Blast 200mg test + 100mg tren → cruise 100mg test + low dose tren + 10iu GH daily.
Their Thought Process: Lower test in Option #2 = less estrogen/aromatization, and tren's non-aromatizing + gives stronger androgenic benefits. Thoughts?

Can using a lower dose of testosterone contribute to a taller final adult height? And can combining this with more potent androgens like tren be beneficial to your face, frame, and physique more than a traditional steroid cycle? This debate to me opens up a new way of thinking when it comes to FULLY maximizing development while utilizing pharmacology.

Maybe I'm an idiot or this makes no sense, or this is already water, let me know your thoughts.
Don't reply to this thread if you're a clavicular meat sucker running your shitty 280 mg of Test Propionate. Test is NOT best there are way better ways to use pharmacology.

I really wanna hop on stuff like hgh but unfortunately no money.

 

[Aqualad]

Genetics dnr