chad8281828
Silver
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2024
- Posts
- 725
- Reputation
- 589
Only one right answer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Gerrard is a better football player then lampard and it’s not even closeAs football player Lampard.
Gerrard in nowadays football would have to play more ahead.
Nah man, i've been a witness to both players careers. Both had fantastic teams, Torres was for a couple of years like the best striker in the world, he had Alonso, Carragher, Riise, Kewell, Kuyt, Morientes, Mascherano, AggerGerrard is a better football player then lampard and it’s not even close
Both do have close stats tbf but look at the teams lampards played with at Chelsea Vs what Gerrard played with at Liverpool .Prolly played w one good team in 20 years vs Lampard who played w ballers for years .
Gerrard was a better defender and overall put lots of effort, he was like an all around player. Lampard was way more offensive, id say he was a better passer actuallyGerrards better in terms of passing,work rate ,strenghth,is smarter and 100 other things
Gerrard played with some good players over the years yes but only played with overall good teams in 2004-2008 and in the 13/14 season .Apart from then yeah he might have one other player in the squad who was good aswell but doesn’t mean much when the rest are shitNah man, i've been a witness to both players careers. Both had fantastic teams, Torres was for a couple of years like the best striker in the world, he had Alonso, Carragher, Riise, Kewell, Kuyt, Morientes, Mascherano, Agger
Its just Chelsea had a more solid core in general that was built upon always (Cech-Terry-Lampard-Drogba)
Gerrard was a better defender and overall put lots of effort, he was like an all around player. Lampard was way more offensive, id say he was a better passer actually
Crazy to think England had them both plus Beckham and never achieved anything
I think Lampards a better finisher than Gerard tbf ,not by much but he still is ,but no one can ping a ball 40 yards like Gerard did .Nah man, i've been a witness to both players careers. Both had fantastic teams, Torres was for a couple of years like the best striker in the world, he had Alonso, Carragher, Riise, Kewell, Kuyt, Morientes, Mascherano, Agger
Its just Chelsea had a more solid core in general that was built upon always (Cech-Terry-Lampard-Drogba)
Gerrard was a better defender and overall put lots of effort, he was like an all around player. Lampard was way more offensive, id say he was a better passer actually
Crazy to think England had them both plus Beckham and never achieved anything
Man during those times there werent super teams except Real and Barsa, and even them had 2-3 local players starting like Salgado/Oleguer/Joe Cole/whoever it might beGerrard played with some good players over the years yes but only played with overall good teams in 2004-2008 and in the 13/14 season .Apart from then yeah he might have one other player in the squad who was good aswell but doesn’t mean much when the rest are shit
Benitez was a great coach, one of the best during his stance in PoolAswell as that he always had shit managers,imagine him with the managers that were at Chelsea,Jose,Ancelotti etc.
Definetly, Lampard was a fantastic player and scored as much as Drogba during many seasons, that by itself says a lot. I guess to you your views and to me mine, there's no problem with thatDo u really think if u replaced Gerard instead of Lampard in that Chelsea team of Terry,Cech,Drogba ,that this would still even be a debate?The fact that they are even comparable with the circumstances Gerard was given is amazing
Yeah I guess ,are u a Chelsea fan?Man during those times there werent super teams except Real and Barsa, and even them had 2-3 local players starting like Salgado/Oleguer/Joe Cole/whoever it might be
Benitez was a great coach, one of the best during his stance in Pool
Definetly, Lampard was a fantastic player and scored as much as Drogba during many seasons, that by itself says a lot. I guess to you your views and to me mine, there's no problem with that
Nah, i liked them though when the Drogba-Lampard daysYeah I guess ,are u a Chelsea fan?
Yeah I am ,I do rate Lampard tho .Yeah PL back in the 2000s is of much higher standerds then PL today .Nah, i liked them though when the Drogba-Lampard days
I was obsessed with PL back in the day. To me the best time to be a football fan. What about you, are you a pool fan?
Dont get me wrong, i know the majority would say Gerrard was better.