STOP micro-rating people "high mtn "high htn" "low chadlite"

[Usernames]

No more of this micro rating shit. Just return back to the old way of rating:

Subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, chadlite, and chad.

No more micro rating people, if you think someone is in between categories then just say "mtn-htn" or "ltn-mtn" etc.

 

[notsocommonthumb]

View attachment 3183104

woah

 

[nathan]

that's stupid

 

[Usernames]

that's stupid

explain, rating people in a range is much better than pinpointing someone to a tiny rate which is completely subjective anyway because people never agree someone is one exact rate

 

[cytoplasm]

No more of this micro rating shit. Just return back to the old way of rating:

Subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, chadlite, and chad.

Thats micro rating already

 

[Usernames]

Thats micro rating already

well then stop hyper micro rating people

 

[cytoplasm]

well then stop hyper micro rating people

*nano

 

[tombradylover]

Cope it’s a valid way of rating

 

[goodgamebro]

bro got ratioed by a cock

 

[Usernames]

Cope it’s a valid way of rating

how is it valid when no one here even agrees on rates, people rate YOU low htn and then sometimes high chadlite lmao

 

[tombradylover]

how is it valid when no one here even agrees on rates, people rate YOU low htn and then sometimes high chadlite lmao

Because ratings are subjective and ppl here don’t know how to rate period. Whether they use low htn high htn or just regular baseline htn chadlite etc their ratings suck. But using those tiers within the system like low mid high is valid because not every HTN is the same. Not every MTN is the same etc etc. low htn is like decent looking while strong HTN is borderline model tier

 

[Usernames]

Because ratings are subjective and ppl here don’t know how to rate period. Whether they use low htn high htn or just regular baseline htn chadlite etc their ratings suck. But using those tiers within the system like low mid high is valid because not every HTN is the same. Not every MTN is the same etc etc.

Yes but what is the point in even deciphering what tier of MTN someone is, or what tier of HTN someone is, when people don't even get rated anywhere near the same range sometimes. I have a friend here who got rated anywhere from MTN to CHADLITE on his thread. So might as well just simplify the rates

 

[tombradylover]

Yes but what is the point in even deciphering what tier of MTN someone is, or what tier of HTN someone is, when people don't even get rated anywhere near the same range sometimes. I have a friend here who got rated anywhere from MTN to CHADLITE on his thread. So might as well just simplify the rates

There is no point. Ratings are subjective. Just use advice on what u think is accurate or legit on how to fix ur fixable failos and improve.

 

[notsocommonthumb]

There is no point. Ratings are subjective. Just use advice on what u think is accurate or legit on how to fix ur fixable failos and improve.

of course they are subjective, but if you get 10 htn rating 2 chadlite and 2 mtn then you know that you are htn for the majority of people

 

[saiya_online]

Because ratings are subjective and ppl here don’t know how to rate period. Whether they use low htn high htn or just regular baseline htn chadlite etc their ratings suck. But using those tiers within the system like low mid high is valid because not every HTN is the same. Not every MTN is the same etc etc. low htn is like decent looking while strong HTN is borderline model tier

Most people rate based off instinct as well very very subjective very subjective most rates are not based on actual measurements because too much work and effort to formulate a proper system and know what they're doing

 

[tombradylover]

of course they are subjective, but if you get 10 htn rating 2 chadlite and 2 mtn then you know that you are htn for the majority of people

Yea it helps u know where u stand but the label itself doesn’t mean much tbh. I think it’s valid to use tiers within tiers to categorically rate someone because like I said not every HTN is the same not every MtN is the same but all the labels itself are meaningless all that matters is most ppl think ur good looking. So yea like u said if ur getting htn and above ratings ur in great shape cuz most ppl think ur good looking

 

[notsocommonthumb]

Yea it helps u know where u stand but the label itself doesn’t mean much tbh. I think it’s valid to use tiers within tiers to categorically rate someone because like I said not every HTN is the same not every MtN is the same but all the labels itself are meaningless all that matters is most ppl think ur good looking. So yea like u said if ur getting htn and above ratings ur in great shape

people should just use out of ten rating, makes it much easier. 1/10

 

[tombradylover]

people should just use out of ten rating, makes it much easier. 1/10

I agree but it’s too normie and gay cuz everyone would rate each other 6 or 7/10 even if u ugly it’s retarded normies are dumb

 

[try2beme]

No more of this micro rating shit. Just return back to the old way of rating:

Subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, chadlite, and chad.

No more micro rating people, if you think someone is in between categories then just say "mtn-htn" or "ltn-mtn" etc.

Half the people who liked this have used such terms….. nonsense thread

 

[try2beme]

Yea it helps u know where u stand but the label itself doesn’t mean much tbh. I think it’s valid to use tiers within tiers to categorically rate someone because like I said not every HTN is the same not every MtN is the same but all the labels itself are meaningless all that matters is most ppl think ur good looking. So yea like u said if ur getting htn and above ratings ur in great shape cuz most ppl think ur good looking

Just look at op’s join date and posts, someone put socks in they mouth for thinking they did something

 

[Timmy]

No more of this micro rating shit. Just return back to the old way of rating:

Subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, chadlite, and chad.

No more micro rating people, if you think someone is in between categories then just say "mtn-htn" or "ltn-mtn" etc.

Bro this is bullshit too. Just say sub5, normie or chad

 

[Clark69]

agreed. this makes people comfortable with overrating themselves and others. "im a low HTN". what it actually means: im an LTN/MTN too delusional to accurately rate myself

it overcomplicates things, too. there should be no questioning if someone is a high HTN or low Chadlite. the difference between a MTN, HTN, and Chadlite should be obvious and clearcut

 

[normie_joe]

No more of this micro rating shit. Just return back to the old way of rating:

Subhuman, ltn, mtn, htn, chadlite, and chad.

No more micro rating people, if you think someone is in between categories then just say "mtn-htn" or "ltn-mtn" etc.

Who gives a shit in the end, whether you get low ltn or high ltn or whatever the fuck, ultimately what matters is if those ratings mirror your IRL experience.

What makes me cage are the self declared htns that say only Chads get women and not them.

 

[Usernames]

Just look at op’s join date and posts, someone put socks in they mouth for thinking they did something

You look as dumb as you are you dumbass gorilla monkey. You really think this is my first account lol

 

[try2beme]

You look as dumb as you are you dumbass gorilla monkey. You really think this is my first account lol

I frankly do not care bitch