Suicide is legit when you are 40

[Bug]

That's when all the pro athletes retire at, they rely on their body and mind for their livelihood. past 40 you are too weak, slow mentally and physically

just suicide in late 30s early 40s

 

[Bug]

imagine being 45 trying to do anything

like dude you are just coping until death, nothing is improving anymore, everything is decreasing

so thats why i need death at 40 or so

 

[noodlelover]

That's when all the pro athletes retire at, they rely on their body and mind for their livelihood. past 40 you are too weak, slow mentally and physically

You're too weak, and mentally and physically slow to be a pro athlete now.

just suicide in late 30s early 40s

By your own logic, you should suicide right now.

 

[Bug]

You're too weak, and mentally and physically slow to be a pro athlete now.

By your own logic, you should suicide right now.

i dont think you understand. if i am weak now i will be even weaker at 40, so i should live now at my strongest then kill myself before i get too weak

 

[TitusA]

That's when all the pro athletes retire at, they rely on their body and mind for their livelihood. past 40 you are too weak, slow mentally and physically

just suicide in late 30s early 40s

U are a retard with a bitch/faggot mentality or u are 15 one of the two. I see 60 year old men getting 30 year olds pregnant and you think life is over at 40.

Also by the age of 40 mental decline and strength decline isn't big (if at all tbh). Its the speed that goes first in pro athletes and shortens their careers strenght lasts way longer. Besides can still be in the 95th percentile for strength, speed etc at 40 (compared to 20 years olds). Ur comparison to pro athletes where even a minor decrease in performance/millisecond slower reaction times or a bad injury can end their career is retarded.

Also what relevance does having the speed to be a pro athlete having to pick up foids in the first place. Ur post is so retarded on so many levels.

 

[noodlelover]

i dont think you understand. if i am weak now i will be even weaker at 40,

You can be stronger and faster at 40 than you are now.

so i should live now at my strongest then kill myself before i get too weak

 

[Pavol]

Or if you look like this

 

[Vincent Freeman]

i dont think you understand. if i am weak now i will be even weaker at 40, so i should live now at my strongest then kill myself before i get too weak

dont mind noodlelover he is over 40 so obviously he will be coping

 

[Bug]

U are a retard with a bitch/faggot mentality or u are 15 one of the two. I see 60 year old men getting 30 year olds pregnant and you think life is over at 40.

Also by the age of 40 mental decline and strength decline isn't big (if at all tbh). Its the speed that goes first in pro athletes and shortens their careers strenght lasts way longer. Besides can still be in the 95th percentile for strength, speed etc at 40 (compared to 20 years olds). Ur comparison to pro athletes where even a minor decrease in performance/millisecond slower reaction times or a bad injury can end their career is retarded.

Also what relevance does having the speed to be a pro athlete having to pick up foids in the first place. Ur post is so retarded on so many levels.

soft nigga too scared of death so you have to cope

 

[Bug]

You can be stronger and faster at 40 than you are now.

you will never be as strong as you could have been at 20, 25, 30. at 40 you are now DECREASING.... you will never get stronger again, you will never look better

 

[noodlelover]

soft nigga too scared of death so you have to cope

You're too scared of life.

 

[Bug]

You're too scared of life.

bro you are 40, its finished for you. old ass dude still trying to looksmaxx when your entire body is telling you to shut it down

 

[reasonably_likeable]

You're too weak, and mentally and physically slow to be a pro athlete now.

By your own logic, you should suicide right now.

isn't it amazing how these copers always draw the line away from their situation

 

[Bug]

isn't it amazing how these copers always draw the line away from their situation

i dont think you understand. if i am weak now i will be even weaker at 40, so i should live now at my strongest then kill myself before i get too weak

dumb ass oldcels man

 

[got.daim]

The argument that suicide becomes legitimate after the age of 40, particularly for former athletes whose livelihoods depend on physical prowess, is a flawed and deeply troubling conclusion. The proposition rests on a simplistic understanding of human value, reducing individuals to mere physical capabilities that naturally decline with age. This view ignores the complexity of human existence, which extends far beyond physical performance. It overlooks the fact that human life does not only have value based on physical output. People possess intellect, creativity, emotional depth, and the ability to influence the world in ways that transcend the body's limitations. The assertion that life is only worth living for those who can continue to perform physically or mentally at a peak level betrays a narrow, utilitarian view of human existence. It assumes that once one's ability to compete or excel in a specific domain diminishes, life itself loses meaning. Moreover, the comparison between professional athletes and the general population is misguided. While athletes may experience intense pressure to maintain physical perfection, most individuals lead lives not dictated by the demands of public spectacle or constant physical competition. The struggles of aging are universal, but they are not necessarily a death sentence for one's purpose or sense of fulfillment. People can, and do, find new avenues for meaning in life as they age, through relationships, intellectual pursuits, or other forms of contribution to society. Also the notion that one should end their life based on the inevitable decline of physical and mental faculties is both despairing and destructive. The essence of life is not to be measured by a constant state of physical excellence, but by the accumulation of experience, wisdom, and the ability to adapt to new challenges. Suicide should not be seen as an escape from the inevitable, aging, decay, and death are parts of the human condition, not signals of life's end. To embrace life, in its fullest form, is to accept its fragility and continue striving for meaning despite the limitations imposed by time. Such an argument dismisses the full spectrum of human experience, reducing individuals to their most transitory and material aspects. It ignores the potential for growth and fulfillment at any age and presents an unreasonably bleak view of the future. Life, even beyond 40, is still full of possibilities.

TLDR: Aging doesn't strip someone's value of living.

 

[Bug]

The argument that suicide becomes legitimate after the age of 40, particularly for former athletes whose livelihoods depend on physical prowess, is a flawed and deeply troubling conclusion. The proposition rests on a simplistic understanding of human value, reducing individuals to mere physical capabilities that naturally decline with age. This view ignores the complexity of human existence, which extends far beyond physical performance. It overlooks the fact that human life does not only have value based on physical output. People possess intellect, creativity, emotional depth, and the ability to influence the world in ways that transcend the body's limitations. The assertion that life is only worth living for those who can continue to perform physically or mentally at a peak level betrays a narrow, utilitarian view of human existence. It assumes that once one's ability to compete or excel in a specific domain diminishes, life itself loses meaning. Moreover, the comparison between professional athletes and the general population is misguided. While athletes may experience intense pressure to maintain physical perfection, most individuals lead lives not dictated by the demands of public spectacle or constant physical competition. The struggles of aging are universal, but they are not necessarily a death sentence for one's purpose or sense of fulfillment. People can, and do, find new avenues for meaning in life as they age, through relationships, intellectual pursuits, or other forms of contribution to society. Also the notion that one should end their life based on the inevitable decline of physical and mental faculties is both despairing and destructive. The essence of life is not to be measured by a constant state of physical excellence, but by the accumulation of experience, wisdom, and the ability to adapt to new challenges. Suicide should not be seen as an escape from the inevitable, aging, decay, and death are parts of the human condition, not signals of life's end. To embrace life, in its fullest form, is to accept its fragility and continue striving for meaning despite the limitations imposed by time. Such an argument dismisses the full spectrum of human experience, reducing individuals to their most transitory and material aspects. It ignores the potential for growth and fulfillment at any age and presents an unreasonably bleak view of the future. Life, even beyond 40, is still full of possibilities.

TLDR: Aging doesn't strip someone's value of living.

did not read

 

[noodlelover]

you will never be as strong as you could have been at 20, 25, 30. at 40 you are now DECREASING.... you will never get stronger again, you will never look better

Technology and Knowledge are increasing.

When you're 20, you'll won't know how to exercise right, how to maximize sleep, what supplements to take, what foods to eat. By the time you're 40, science and technology will have advanced two decades. This includes nutrition knowledge and body building knowledge.

That's more papers you can read, to understand how to optimize muscle growth and speed (or whatever your goals are). You also have two decades of trial and error, to understand your own body better.

I worked out when I was 20, but I'm bigger and stronger now, mostly because I know so much more.

But technology also increases. Technology to maximize muscle growth and repair that we didn't have twenty years ago. And in twenty years from now that technology will be even better.

We have technology to slow and reverse some types of aging damage now, and that technology will have advanced twenty years, in twenty years.

You personally, can be better looking, stronger, and faster, at 40 than you are right now, if you choose to keep improving and keep learning, and I hope you do.

 

[TiktokUser]

The argument that suicide becomes legitimate after the age of 40, particularly for former athletes whose livelihoods depend on physical prowess, is a flawed and deeply troubling conclusion. The proposition rests on a simplistic understanding of human value, reducing individuals to mere physical capabilities that naturally decline with age. This view ignores the complexity of human existence, which extends far beyond physical performance. It overlooks the fact that human life does not only have value based on physical output. People possess intellect, creativity, emotional depth, and the ability to influence the world in ways that transcend the body's limitations. The assertion that life is only worth living for those who can continue to perform physically or mentally at a peak level betrays a narrow, utilitarian view of human existence. It assumes that once one's ability to compete or excel in a specific domain diminishes, life itself loses meaning. Moreover, the comparison between professional athletes and the general population is misguided. While athletes may experience intense pressure to maintain physical perfection, most individuals lead lives not dictated by the demands of public spectacle or constant physical competition. The struggles of aging are universal, but they are not necessarily a death sentence for one's purpose or sense of fulfillment. People can, and do, find new avenues for meaning in life as they age, through relationships, intellectual pursuits, or other forms of contribution to society. Also the notion that one should end their life based on the inevitable decline of physical and mental faculties is both despairing and destructive. The essence of life is not to be measured by a constant state of physical excellence, but by the accumulation of experience, wisdom, and the ability to adapt to new challenges. Suicide should not be seen as an escape from the inevitable, aging, decay, and death are parts of the human condition, not signals of life's end. To embrace life, in its fullest form, is to accept its fragility and continue striving for meaning despite the limitations imposed by time. Such an argument dismisses the full spectrum of human experience, reducing individuals to their most transitory and material aspects. It ignores the potential for growth and fulfillment at any age and presents an unreasonably bleak view of the future. Life, even beyond 40, is still full of possibilities.

TLDR: Aging doesn't strip someone's value of living.

Nigga really used ChatGPT

DNRD

 

[got.daim]

Nigga really used ChatGPT

DNRD

Use a detector, also I was a writer before becoming a full time NEET.

did not read

Lazy retard.
I literally included a TLDR

 

[TiktokUser]

You personally, can be better looking, stronger, and faster, at 40 than you are right now, if you choose to keep improving and keep learning.

This is such fucking cope

 

[Bugmaxxed]

my dad is 46 and is a terramiddleclassworkingchad

 

[got.daim]

This is such fucking cope

If you think that's cope, I'm done responding to your idiocy.

 

[noodlelover]

This is such fucking cope

It's not for him, if his profile pic is what he looks like now.

 

[TiktokUser]

Technology and Knowledge are increasing.

When you're 20, you'll won't know how to exercise right, how to maximize sleep, what supplements to take, what foods to eat. By the time you're 40, science and technology will have advanced two decades. This includes nutrition knowledge and body building knowledge.

That's more papers you can read, to understand how to optimize muscle growth and speed (or whatever your goals are). You also have two decades of trial and error, to understand your own body better.

I worked out when I was 20, but I'm bigger and stronger now, mostly because I know so much more.

But technology also increases. Technology to maximize muscle growth and repair that we didn't have twenty years ago. And in twenty years from now that technology will be even better.

We have technology to slow and reverse some types of aging damage now, and that technology will have advanced twenty years, in twenty years.

You personally, can be better looking, stronger, and faster, at 40 than you are right now, if you choose to keep improving and keep learning, and I hope you do.

If you think that's cope, I'm done responding to your idiocy.

It’s not just a significant physical decline, the brain also begins to deteriorate around the age of 30. This includes slower cognitive processing, memory changes, white matter reduction, and brain shrinkage. These effects become significantly worse pasts that age. You oldcels are coping because you can’t admit the harsh reality. You’re also a larper @got.daim you didnt write that shit, literally most obvious ChatGPT response. Cringefuel

 

[got.daim]

It’s not just a significant physical decline, the brain also begins to deteriorate around the age of 30. This includes slower cognitive processing, memory changes, white matter reduction, and brain shrinkage. These effects become significantly worse pasts that age. You oldcels are coping because you can’t admit the harsh reality. You’re also a larper @got.daim you didnt write that shit, literally most obvious ChatGPT response. Cringefuel

I did write it. Also you can still find enjoyment in things, I'm done responding to this bait.

 

[noodlelover]

It’s not just a significant physical decline, the brain also begins to deteriorate around the age of 30. This includes slower cognitive processing, memory changes, white matter reduction, and brain shrinkage. These effects become significantly worse pasts that age. You oldcels are coping because you can’t admit the harsh reality. You’re also a larper @got.daim you didnt write that shit, literally most obvious ChatGPT response. Cringefuel

You're confusing correlation with causation.

The average person is deteriorating by age 40, but you can continue learning, improving, and getting sharper and stronger through your 40s.

Slower cognitive processing, and white matter reduction are not an inevitability, and neither is muscle loss by 40.

 

[noodlelover]

Another point on pro-athletes, is that their hormone profiles weather genetic or exogenous are optimized for peak performance in their 20s over anti-aging and repair.

So they will be less effective in their 40s. But a regular person who is continuing to improve, could quiet easily be stronger, faster, smarter, and better looking in their 40s compared to their 20s.