Take a look at this Indian hunter gatherer tribe couple with exceptional facial development and straight white teeth

[Sidewalk_knights]

Honestly didn't know they were Indian, I thought they were fully African. How come almost all indigenous people along the southern latitude in the entirety of the old world (middle east, south India, SEA etc) look fully African? Even native Filipinos and Malaysians look african, with curly hair and skull shape and everything. Why is this???

 

[6ft4]

Mogged by a chavvy Bri'ish JB with narrow palate and flat maxilla but has upturned nose and giga feminine appeal

 

[TrueBlueRetard]

How come almost all indigenous people along the southern latitude in the entirety of the old world (middle east, south India, SEA etc) look fully African? Even native Filipinos and Malaysians look african, with curly hair and skull shape and everything. Why is this???

less evolved, duh

 

[BimaxLaser]

Honestly didn't know they were Indian, I thought they were fully African. How come almost all indigenous people along the southern latitude in the entirety of the old world (middle east, south India, SEA etc) look fully African? Even native Filipinos and Malaysians look african, with curly hair and skull shape and everything. Why is this???

Do you have a fucking disability. Its obviously because thats the best pheno for that climate

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

Mogged by a chavvy Bri'ish JB with narrow palate and flat maxilla but has upturned nose and giga feminine appeal

Yeah, I think the giant orbitals are a giga failo, paired together with the roundish skull. If they had Caucasian narrow orbitals they'd be turbo moggers, huge eye area pill.

Regardless though, their smiles are super wide and charming and their eyes are bright and lively, great symmetry. Certaintly not unattractive, just a little bit of unideal things here and there, can't really lose with such a developed face I think.

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

Do you have a fucking disability. Its obviously because thats the best pheno for that climate

But native Americans, even those that lived in very hard climates never had curly hair or very dark skin or huge orbitals.

 

[BimaxLaser]

But native Americans, even those that lived in very hard climates never had curly hair or very dark skin or huge orbitals.

Different climate different culture different phenos to begin with and shiiit. Native americans basically had non stop tribal warfare so they evolved armour basically with massive face bones

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

Different climate different culture different phenos to begin with and shiiit. Native americans basically had non stop tribal warfare so they evolved armour basically with massive face bones

Yeah, these cheekbones are catroonishly large lol

 

[BimaxLaser]

Yeah, these cheekbones are catroonishly large lol
View attachment 3310087

The Native American woman have somewhat less cartoonisbly large ones. Looks good asf tbh

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

The Native American woman have somewhat less cartoonisbly large ones. Looks good asf tbh

There are also some african tribes with exceptionally large cheekbones and more angular faces.

 

[BimaxLaser]

View attachment 3310093
Er zijn ook enkele Afrikaanse stammen met uitzonderlijk grote jukbeenderen en hoekigere gezichten.

Similar lifestyle. Our soft food overall doet and sedentary life also influences this but im not sure to what extent

 

[Deleted member 107618]

But native Americans, even those that lived in very hard climates never had curly hair or very dark skin or huge orbitals.

because theyre not from america, theyre oriental in genetics

 

[looks>books]

Damn better than most influencers.

This is what the liberal west has taken from us

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

because theyre not from america, theyre oriental in genetics

But shouldn't SEA also be "oriental" in genetics (also isn't that a rude way of referring to east Asian people(s)?)

Here's indigenous Filipinos, some look 30% Asian, while others look full blooded African, look:

Seems beauty wasn't a big priority for them with those looks. Indigenous Filipinos seemed to have an "abundance over quality" mindset when it came to their people's. Preferring to birth a bunch of short weak and physically unattractive offspring as opposed to strong beautiful and noble ones.

A common affliction with people's born under certain latitudes; likely due to extreme harsh environmental elements and lack of food or unideal cultural phenomena (some cultures make themselves ugly on purpose or mutilate themselves)

Northern born peoples are always taller, stronger and better looking with more sophisticated states of existence, deeper sense of mental toughness, usually a higher level of technological achievement and much more culturally dignified in basically all aspects. Northern people's, no matter which continent, are usually of a better stock.

That's why the Chinese went to Singapore and mogged the natives with their superior skills and culture and built one of the greatest countries in the world, yet Cambodians can't figure out how to tie their shoe laces.

 

[Deleted member 107618]

But shouldn't SEA also be "oriental" in genetics (also isn't that a rude way of referring to east Asian people(s)?)

Here's indigenous Filipinos, some look 30% Asian, while others look full blooded African, look:
View attachment 3310456View attachment 3310458View attachment 3310459
Seems beauty wasn't a big priority for them with those looks. Indigenous Filipinos seemed to have an "abundance over quality" mindset when it came to their people's. Preferring to birth a bunch of short weak and physically unattractive offspring as opposed to strong beautiful and noble ones.

A common affliction with people's born under certain latitudes; likely due to extreme harsh environmental elements and lack of food or unideal cultural phenomena (some cultures make themselves ugly on purpose or mutilate themselves)

Northern born peoples are always taller, stronger and better looking with more sophisticated states of existence, deeper sense of mental toughness, usually a higher level of technological achievement and much more culturally dignified in basically all aspects. Northern people's, no matter which continent, are usually of a better stock.

That's why the Chinese went to Singapore and mogged the natives with their superior skills and culture and built one of the greatest countries in the world, yet Cambodians can't figure out how to tie their shoe laces.

uhhh not what im talking abt, its not oriental its mong*loid and didnt read for the most part, but the patagones were tall and also the southern most people in the americas

ohh i see what your talking about, african people never migrated to the americas until slavery majorly, it was through the baring strait that nothern asian or siberian people were able to migrate to the americas, they then grew darker features, and the "comical"cheekbones due to their diet and nomadic lifestyle.

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

uhhh not what im talking abt, its not oriental its mong*loid and didnt read for the most part, but the patagones were tall and also the southern most people in the americas

ohh i see what your talking about, african people never migrated to the americas until slavery majorly, it was through the baring strait that nothern asian or siberian people were able to migrate to the americas, they then grew darker features, and the "comical"cheekbones due to their diet and nomadic lifestyle.

The reason Patagonians were strong was because they were close to the south pole, the environment around either of the poles is usually conducive to producing a more sophisticated people. When I say "northern" people I'm merely speaking about the climate and environment. I ommitted outliers like Patagonia because it proves the rule more or less.

And if almost every indigenous peoples has curly hair and similar face structure in lower latituded in Eurasia does that mean they all come from the same group of people? Because amazionian natives don't have curly hair nor similar bone structure at all despite living in essentially the same environment. All primitives of the old world unanimously look african...

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

uhhh not what im talking abt, its not oriental its mong*loid and didnt read for the most part, but the patagones were tall and also the southern most people in the americas

ohh i see what your talking about, african people never migrated to the americas until slavery majorly, it was through the baring strait that nothern asian or siberian people were able to migrate to the americas, they then grew darker features, and the "comical"cheekbones due to their diet and nomadic lifestyle.

I also wanted to point out something interesting about the Patagonian natives.

Despite similar environmental circumstances and better access to large prey southern most natives are still facially inferior to the proper northern natives Americans, who have that noble stout look to them. Southern most natives are still descendants of subhumans that got beaten out of bufallo rich grounds in the north, pushed into the south, made their way through the amazon and into the plains of Argentina and Chile to begin properly developing into moggers.

So they are still descendants of a lesser people's then the ones in the north, who best them into south America against their will to begin with. Like look at this mog.

Patagonian natives.

American natives

North American amerindians were just giga moggers, seriously they might be some of the best looking people to ever exist. The southern amerindians are capped at high MTN.

 

[Deleted member 107618]

The reason Patagonians were strong was because they were close to the south pole, the environment around either of the poles is usually conducive to producing a more sophisticated people. When I say "northern" people I'm merely speaking about the climate and environment. I ommitted outliers like Patagonia because it proves the rule more or less.

And if almost every indigenous peoples has curly hair and similar face structure in lower latituded in Eurasia does that mean they all come from the same group of people? Because amazionian natives don't have curly hair nor similar bone structure at all despite living in essentially the same environment. All primitives of the old world unanimously look african...

okay, you should search migration patterns of early humans if your interested on what people can guess at, but just by looking you can see that central , south, and north americans are phenotypically close, and north natives just traveled down, to central, then to south

and yeah all people are "scientifically" descendants of africans,and some other stuff i guess but word your stuff better man i can barely understand

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

okay, you should search migration patterns of early humans if your interested on what people can guess at, but just by looking you can see that central , south, and north americans are phenotypically close, and north natives just traveled down, to central, then to south

and yeah all people are "scientifically" descendants of africans,and some other stuff i guess but word your stuff better man i can barely understand

Yes, I know that. But what I'm saying is that the amerindians that migrated to south America didn't do so by choice but were instead outcompeted and beaten out of that prime hunting land by some stronger amerindians who went on to become the moggers we know today.

What I'm saying essentially is that southern native Americans (south mexico and below) are incels, northern natives are the Chad's. And even though they are genetically similar, one was distinctly dominant enough to warrant it's own class, creating a sort of "lower caste" and "upper caste" dynamic between them. Similar blood, yet vastly different rates of exceptionalism. Amazonian amerindians look 100% SEA, northern natives look ambiguous at times and are significantly better in terms of facial attractiveness.

This (amazon natives)

Vs this (plains natives)

They don't look similar at all tbh, aside from being asiatic they are clearly distinct. One exudes superiority, the other incel vibes. The man on the right looks European almost actually.

 

[Deleted member 107618]

Yes, I know that. But what I'm saying is that the amerindians that migrated to south America didn't do so by choice but were instead outcompeted and beaten out of that prime hunting land by some stronger amerindians who went on to become the moggers we know today.

What I'm saying essentially is that southern native Americans (south mexico and below) are incels, northern natives are the Chad's. And even though they are genetically similar, one was distinctly dominant enough to warrant it's own class, creating a sort of "lower caste" and "upper caste" dynamic between them. Similar blood, yet vastly different rates of exceptionalism. Amazonian amerindians look 100% SEA, northern natives look ambiguous at times and are significantly better in terms of facial attractiveness.

This (amazon natives)
View attachment 3310542View attachment 3310543

Vs this (plains natives)
View attachment 3310544View attachment 3310545
They don't look similar at all tbh, aside from being asiatic they are clearly distinct. One exudes superiority, the other incel vibes. The man on the right looks European almost actually.

repmaxxing for what unc

 

[Sidewalk_knights]

repmaxxing for what unc

Those are genuine southern amerindians from the amazon... That's how they look. I think I saw them in a street walk video in Pattaya tbh lol.

Peruvians are moggers though, cannot lie:

Very striking faces. The look of an strong Inca descendant indeed.