
Manchild_v2
He/Him | Muslim | Zionist | Latinx | Black ✊🏿
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2025
- Posts
- 4,942
- Reputation
- 7,028
Real recognize real.
He is passing in Europe.
@SecularIslamist whiter than any curry in bollywood. Looks almost like an American WASP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Real recognize real.
He is passing in Europe.
@SecularIslamist whiter than any curry in bollywood. Looks almost like an American WASP.
He is clearly a Muslim.He should marry Israeli woman
This will always be a backhanded compliment, and everybody knowsBrooooootal haha "you don't look Indian, that's so nice!"
I didn't play the vid the first time I wrote in this thread, then I played the vid and heard that, I was like LMFAO. So typical.This will always be a backhanded compliment, and everybody knows![]()
Either parsi, or probably some muslim exclusive group like rohilla pashtun or some other high caste muslim group.He might be Parsi
All the indians in the comment section
"SAAR HE LOOKS SO INDIAN SAAR, SAAR YOU NEVER SAW NORTH INDIAN SAAR!?"
Meanwhile the first images i see when i look up north indian in Google images:
View attachment 3940744
View attachment 3940748View attachment 3940749![]()
I really think he's mixed race.Either parsi, or probably some muslim exclusive group like rohilla pashtun or some other high caste muslim group.
The vast majority of exotic white-ish Indians are muslims who got displaced by the british/russians. Bollywood cucks itself by refusing to use muslims for political reasons.Fuark he is more whiter than Neil Nitin Mukesh. He could tell me he's from Sweden.
How tf did this happen? His mother clearly got raped by some white boy.
@CFW432 @JohnDoe @Diarrhoea @shia.jihadist
My guess too, he could be a displaced Iranian though. Regardless he is definitely a muslim and none of his ancestors were hindu shitskins, so it makes sense he is white lookingI really think he's mixed race.
Are you talking about Parsis? All the South Asians who looked like this were always half white at the very least.My guess too, he could be a displaced Iranian though. Regardless he is definitely a muslim and none of his ancestors were hindu shitskins, so it makes sense he is white looking
Yeah I don't think this guy is fully Indian, looks too white to be anything in that region but an very exceptional Afghan.Are you talking about Parsis? All the South Asians who looked like this were always half white at the very least.![]()
Tbh, all those ethnic groups you mentioned, they still have distinctive facial features that set them apart from actual whites (a la thicker eyebrows, bigger noses, fuller lips). This guy's facial features are completely white (thinner eyebrows, smaller nose and thinner lips). I'd be surprised if he's fully ethnic.Yeah I don't think this guy is fully Indian, looks too white to be anything in that region but an very exceptional Afghan.
Iranic groups, Parsis are whiter but they still have a bit of curry in them. I'm talking the Muslims, Kashmiris, Pathans, etc. Groups that lived isolated in the mountains and maintained a lot of Central Asian and Aryan DNA and never were hindus and went straight from Pagans and Buddists into muslims
Yeah he looks like he's from Poland. Might be half white half muslim curry because even half curries (i'm talking standard curry) doesn't usually look this whiteTbh, all those ethnic groups you mentioned, they still have distinctive facial features that set them apart from actual whites (a la thicker eyebrows, bigger noses, fuller lips). This guy's facial features are completely white (thinner eyebrows, smaller nose and thinner lips). I'd be surprised if he's fully ethnic.
zero percent jattJatt tajik mix
Hmm idk he could be jatt, similar skin tone and then half pamiri tajikzero percent jatt
Probably.Yeah he looks like he's from Poland. Might be half white half muslim curry because even half curries (i'm talking standard curry) doesn't usually look this white
Jatt are high Steppe, or specifically Jat and Ror. Ror especially have the highest Steppe in all of South Asia, closely followed by Jats. However, genotype =/= phenotype, I've posted a picture before of a 44.4% Steppe-scoring Jat who looked like your typical north Indian.zero percent jatt
Anything higher then 20 is super atypical for non European ethnic groups (except tajiks it seems)Probably.
Jatt are high Steppe, or specifically Jat and Ror. Ror especially have the highest Steppe in all of South Asia, closely followed by Jats. However, genotype =/= phenotype, I've posted a picture before of a 44.4% Steppe-scoring Jat who looked like your typical north Indian.
Steppe doesn't make you white especially not when the rest of the ancestry is from south asian groups and the steppe is OGProbably.
Jatt are high Steppe, or specifically Jat and Ror. Ror especially have the highest Steppe in all of South Asia, closely followed by Jats. However, genotype =/= phenotype, I've posted a picture before of a 44.4% Steppe-scoring Jat who looked like your typical north Indian.
Indo iranic Steppe is very light (look at sintashta reconstructions and scythian descriptions) so it would make sense that groups high in that admixture would look much whiter then their neighboursSteppe doesn't make you white especially not when the rest of the ancestry is from south asian groups and the steppe is OG
Is that so? That cannot be true. I score 22% Steppe and I don't have any Steppe haplogroups, neither Y-DNA nor mtDNA. Maybe I'm using the wrong calculator. Can you get me the link for that one?Anything higher then 20 is super atypical for non European ethnic groups (except tajiks it seems)
View attachment 3940820
That's true, but the fact this guy had Steppe similar to northern Europeans and looked incredibly different from them is kinda funny in and of itself. It's the SAHG ancestry that really ruins it for people when it comes to phenotypes.Steppe doesn't make you white especially not when the rest of the ancestry is from south asian groups and the steppe is OG
Sythians were/are shitskins with gook dnaIndo iranic Steppe is very light (look at sintashta reconstructions and scythian descriptions) so it would make sense that groups high in that admixture would look much whiter then their neighbours
This image is just how genetically close some Eurasian groups are to CWC, cwc it's self only has 70% steppe. It's strange that you assume the steppe all together with haplogroups as they don't matter that much individually.Is that so? That cannot be true. I score 22% Steppe and I don't have any Steppe haplogroups, neither Y-DNA nor mtDNA. Maybe I'm using the wrong calculator. Can you get me the link for that one?
Its because there's still a shit ton of undefined/ghost ancestry among steppe groups. Not even including the white looking steppe related people in Russia and Europe predate those in India by over a thousand years.That's true, but the fact this guy had Steppe similar to northern Europeans and looked incredibly different from them is kinda funny in and of itself. It's the SAHG ancestry that really ruins it for people when it comes to phenotypes.![]()
That's absolutely incorrect about scythians as every single source has said that scythians were red headed and blue eyed, and whilst yes they had east Eurasian admixture it was incredible dependant on the individual as there is alot of varying ee admixture from close to half to absolutely 0 in some individuals.Sythians were/are shitskins with gook dna
View attachment 3940831
Anatolian
The reason those high in steppe northern europeans are so white looking is because they are heavily mixed with the european hunters and are inbred. rors for the same reason via the caste system while for europe its because of an extremely low founder population.
The curry steppe ancestry is not remotely the same as those found in Europe because of ghost DNA / undefined populations/drift and of course different groups going there and breeding with the locals.
Because having 22% Steppe seems like a lot for someone who's South Asian and doesn't have any Steppe haplogroups, since South Asians usually have at least one Steppe haplogroup (such as R1a). Steppe mtDNA would be H, I think. Some South Asians have both R1a and H, and they also score high Steppe. Then you've got Dravidians with R1a and they score no Steppe.This image is just how genetically close some Eurasian groups are to CWC, cwc it's self only has 70% steppe. It's strange that you assume the steppe all together with haplogroups as they don't matter that much individually.
What would be a steppe mtdna haplogroup ? Ik my y is j2 and my Mt is u5 which from what I read is from cromagnids
I think what makes MENA lighter than South Asians is because they have more ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) ancestry. Usually, the lighter people even in South Asia score higher levels of ANF compared to other South Asians. I didn't know there was ghost ancestry in Steppe groups. SAHG is also a ghost population, so that means we have at least two groups that we use as a reference with ghost ancestry.... what makes it even crazier is the third component is also one/third SAHG, meaning we're modelling South Asians with 3 ghost populations? Just fucking lol.Its because there's still a shit ton of undefined/ghost ancestry among steppe groups. Not even including the white looking steppe related people in Russia and Europe predate those in India by over a thousand years.
Steppe isn't even the whitest population of Europeans, it's the gatherers. The anatolians are equally white as well
Thanks for adding that part about ANF, because it confirms what I just said here:Steppe ancestry isnt enough to pass as white or even med for that matter, if its forced to mix with AASI dna. AASI dna is way to strong and overpowers steppe dna phenotypically.
Theres a reason why iranians have lower aryan ancestry that most middle and upper caste north indians, and yet are still lighter on average with more meditteranean and caucasoid physical features.
Thats because they have low to no aasi. And also because they are mixed with anatolian farmer dna which is actually a whitening ancestry. high Anatolian farmer dna is the reason why levantine arabs look southern european passing, while gulf arabs look like indians cause they are overwhelmingly natufian.
There is a group of people who are mainly a mixture of iranian neolithic farmer and steppe aryan dna, they are called pamiris, this is how they look:
View attachment 3940890View attachment 3940892View attachment 3940893View attachment 3940894
View attachment 3940895View attachment 3940896View attachment 3940897
View attachment 3940899
I think what makes MENA lighter than South Asians is because they have more ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) ancestry. Usually, the lighter people even in South Asia score higher levels of ANF compared to other South Asians. I didn't know there was ghost ancestry in Steppe groups. SAHG is also a ghost population, so that means we have at least two groups that we use as a reference with ghost ancestry.... what makes it even crazier is the third component is also one/third SAHG, meaning we're modelling South Asians with 3 ghost populations? Just fucking lol.
"While haplogroup R1b is not common in India, certain populations do show some presence of it. The Lambadi people, for example, have a relatively high percentage, around 37%."R1a not R1b
Indiana don't have R1b
Plus this man has probably anf DNA(which makes him slightly less curry than others)
Not Chad more like MTN as well
I know about the y dna being caucasian derived I was more wondering about my Mt beacuse my mums ancestry is very western orientedBecause having 22% Steppe seems like a lot for someone who's South Asian and doesn't have any Steppe haplogroups, since South Asians usually have at least one Steppe haplogroup (such as R1a). Steppe mtDNA would be H, I think. Some South Asians have both R1a and H, and they also score high Steppe. Then you've got Dravidians with R1a and they score no Steppe.
Cool, my mtDNA is actually U2. Interesting to see we both have U mtDNAs, but mine is a South Asian-specific haplogroup, and not related to the Steppe peoples. Your Y-DNA is actually Caucasian, it's usually MENAs who have J2, for example.
ya anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry is actually the whitening ancestry for alot of europeans as well. ANF was actually lighter than european hunter gatheres as well. Europeans only get their blue eyes from hunter gatherers, but their skin whitening is mainly from ANF.Thanks for adding that part about ANF, because it confirms what I just said here:
They are diverse of course, but even Libyans and Sardinians were described as light featured in the historiography. I wouldn't lay any weight on it.That's absolutely incorrect about scythians as every single source has said that scythians were red headed and blue eyed, and whilst yes they had east Eurasian admixture it was incredible dependant on the individual as there is alot of varying ee admixture from close to half to absolutely 0 in some individuals.
Also Europeans steppe admixture comes from the same people as the indo iranic steppe admixture (corded ware) who were mixed with shg and such. They then split off to fatyanovo and so on.
The Indo iranic steppe is from the same population as the european one as they both stem from CWC, most Europeans just have more of the admixture.
Pamiris are tajik right ?Steppe ancestry isnt enough to pass as white or even med for that matter, if its forced to mix with AASI dna. AASI dna is way to strong and overpowers steppe dna phenotypically.
Theres a reason why iranians have lower aryan ancestry than most middle and upper caste north indians, and yet are still lighter on average with more meditteranean and caucasoid physical features.
Thats because they have low to no aasi. And also because they are mixed with anatolian farmer dna which is actually a whitening ancestry. high Anatolian farmer dna is the reason why levantine arabs look southern european passing, while gulf arabs look like indians cause they are overwhelmingly natufian.
There is a group of people who are mainly a mixture of iranian neolithic farmer and steppe aryan dna, they are called pamiris, this is how they look:
View attachment 3940890View attachment 3940892View attachment 3940893View attachment 3940894
View attachment 3940895View attachment 3940896View attachment 3940897
View attachment 3940899
Could be"While haplogroup R1b is not common in India, certain populations do show some presence of it. The Lambadi people, for example, have a relatively high percentage, around 37%."
Natufian farmers are close genetically to the anatolian onesya anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry is actually the whitening ancestry for alot of europeans as well. ANF was actually lighter than european hunter gatheres as well. Europeans only get their blue eyes from hunter gatherers, but their skin whitening is mainly from ANF.
There are 3 neolithic farmer populations, in terms of lightest to darkest it is: Anatolian Neolithic Farmer, Neolithic Iranian Farmer, and Natufian Farmers.
Yeah its the anatolian, because they are the biggest contributor to europeans, but you can also say the gathers are exclusive mostly to western and central europe but exist in the periphery.I think what makes MENA lighter than South Asians is because they have more ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) ancestry. Usually, the lighter people even in South Asia score higher levels of ANF compared to other South Asians. I didn't know there was ghost ancestry in Steppe groups. SAHG is also a ghost population, so that means we have at least two groups that we use as a reference with ghost ancestry.... what makes it even crazier is the third component is also one/third SAHG, meaning we're modelling South Asians with 3 ghost populations? Just fucking lol.
Yeah, so U5 is split into U5a and U5b, one of these are found frequently in northern Europeans (Finnish people to be exact).I know about the y dna being caucasian derived I was more wondering about my Mt beacuse my mums ancestry is very western oriented
What kind of Euro HG are we talking about here, WSHG or EEHG?ya anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry is actually the whitening ancestry for alot of europeans as well. ANF was actually lighter than european hunter gatheres as well. Europeans only get their blue eyes from hunter gatherers, but their skin whitening is mainly from ANF.
There are 3 neolithic farmer populations, in terms of lightest to darkest it is: Anatolian Neolithic Farmer, Neolithic Iranian Farmer, and Natufian Farmers.
It would definitely be funny if he had C or H.Could be
However he is most likely R1a
Would be funny if he has Dravid haplogroup
Which one ? And what's the other found inYeah, so U5 is split into U5a and U5b, one of these are found frequently in northern Europeans (Finnish people to be exact).
What kind of Euro HG are we talking about here, WSHG or EEHG?
Brootal for Jatt bhai, still less Aryan than a Yemeni desert dweller. Luckily I'm not a Steppe guy, I'm a Farmer kanger anyway.Yeah its the anatolian, because they are the biggest contributor to europeans, but you can also say the gathers are exclusive mostly to western and central europe but exist in the periphery.
The reason Arabs even saudis and yemenis are still closer to even swedes than a high class jatt is because the saudi's entire genome is basically caucasoid natufian which is like 2/3rds of the anatolian break up and the swedes carry about 1/3rd of that, which gives them a distant but steady continuum.
the ghost dna in indian steppe people as well as the general alien nature of the south eurasian dna pull them even farther. but some of that ghost DNA in the indian step is related to Iranian people and is at least partially caucasoid (probs halfway between a south and central asian). where that ghost dna doesn't show up is in groups like pashtuns which are basically a more ancient steppe + iranic ancestry