Tall R1B Aryan Indian Chad

Manchild_v2

Manchild_v2

He/Him | Muslim | Zionist | Latinx | Black ✊🏿
Joined
Feb 5, 2025
Posts
4,942
Reputation
7,028


Real recognize real.

He is passing in Europe.
@SecularIslamist whiter than any curry in bollywood. Looks almost like an American WASP.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: rope2cope and SecularIslamist
Where in india is he from!?!
 
He should marry Israeli woman
He is clearly a Muslim.

Aryan Indians/Pakistanis are almost always Muslims and avoided breeding with hindu dravidians
 
Fuark he is more whiter than Neil Nitin Mukesh. He could tell me he's from Sweden.

How tf did this happen? His mother clearly got raped by some white boy.

@CFW432 @JohnDoe @Diarrhoea @shia.jihadist
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2 and rope2cope
He's definitely mixed race.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2
Brooooootal haha "you don't look Indian, that's so nice!"
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Manchild_v2 and CFW432
Brooooootal haha "you don't look Indian, that's so nice!"
This will always be a backhanded compliment, and everybody knows :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
This will always be a backhanded compliment, and everybody knows :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
I didn't play the vid the first time I wrote in this thread, then I played the vid and heard that, I was like LMFAO. So typical. :ROFLMAO:
 
All the indians in the comment section
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

"SAAR HE LOOKS SO INDIAN SAAR, SAAR YOU NEVER SAW NORTH INDIAN SAAR!?"

Meanwhile the first images i see when i look up north indian in Google images:



5162473_1000084986.jpg
1000084987
5162475_1000084988.jpg
1000084989
1000084990
 

Attachments

  • 1000084986.jpg
    1000084986.jpg
    920.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 1000084988.jpg
    1000084988.jpg
    858.9 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: psychomandible, Manchild_v2, rope2cope and 1 other person
He might be Parsi
Either parsi, or probably some muslim exclusive group like rohilla pashtun or some other high caste muslim group.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2 and Gengar
Fuark he is more whiter than Neil Nitin Mukesh. He could tell me he's from Sweden.

How tf did this happen? His mother clearly got raped by some white boy.

@CFW432 @JohnDoe @Diarrhoea @shia.jihadist
The vast majority of exotic white-ish Indians are muslims who got displaced by the british/russians. Bollywood cucks itself by refusing to use muslims for political reasons.

This guy is a Kashmiri
 
  • Love it
Reactions: SecularIslamist
I really think he's mixed race.
My guess too, he could be a displaced Iranian though. Regardless he is definitely a muslim and none of his ancestors were hindu shitskins, so it makes sense he is white looking
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
My guess too, he could be a displaced Iranian though. Regardless he is definitely a muslim and none of his ancestors were hindu shitskins, so it makes sense he is white looking
Are you talking about Parsis? All the South Asians who looked like this were always half white at the very least. :p
 
Are you talking about Parsis? All the South Asians who looked like this were always half white at the very least. :p
Yeah I don't think this guy is fully Indian, looks too white to be anything in that region but an very exceptional Afghan.

Iranic groups, Parsis are whiter but they still have a bit of curry in them. I'm talking the Muslims, Kashmiris, Pathans, etc. Groups that lived isolated in the mountains and maintained a lot of Central Asian and Aryan DNA and never were hindus and went straight from Pagans and Buddists into muslims
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist and Gengar
Yeah I don't think this guy is fully Indian, looks too white to be anything in that region but an very exceptional Afghan.

Iranic groups, Parsis are whiter but they still have a bit of curry in them. I'm talking the Muslims, Kashmiris, Pathans, etc. Groups that lived isolated in the mountains and maintained a lot of Central Asian and Aryan DNA and never were hindus and went straight from Pagans and Buddists into muslims
Tbh, all those ethnic groups you mentioned, they still have distinctive facial features that set them apart from actual whites (a la thicker eyebrows, bigger noses, fuller lips). This guy's facial features are completely white (thinner eyebrows, smaller nose and thinner lips). I'd be surprised if he's fully ethnic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2
Tbh, all those ethnic groups you mentioned, they still have distinctive facial features that set them apart from actual whites (a la thicker eyebrows, bigger noses, fuller lips). This guy's facial features are completely white (thinner eyebrows, smaller nose and thinner lips). I'd be surprised if he's fully ethnic.
Yeah he looks like he's from Poland. Might be half white half muslim curry because even half curries (i'm talking standard curry) doesn't usually look this white
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Jatt tajik mix
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Manchild_v2
Yeah he looks like he's from Poland. Might be half white half muslim curry because even half curries (i'm talking standard curry) doesn't usually look this white
Probably.
zero percent jatt
Jatt are high Steppe, or specifically Jat and Ror. Ror especially have the highest Steppe in all of South Asia, closely followed by Jats. However, genotype =/= phenotype, I've posted a picture before of a 44.4% Steppe-scoring Jat who looked like your typical north Indian.
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
Probably.

Jatt are high Steppe, or specifically Jat and Ror. Ror especially have the highest Steppe in all of South Asia, closely followed by Jats. However, genotype =/= phenotype, I've posted a picture before of a 44.4% Steppe-scoring Jat who looked like your typical north Indian.
Anything higher then 20 is super atypical for non European ethnic groups (except tajiks it seems)
IMG 20250720 220555 955
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Gengar
Probably.

Jatt are high Steppe, or specifically Jat and Ror. Ror especially have the highest Steppe in all of South Asia, closely followed by Jats. However, genotype =/= phenotype, I've posted a picture before of a 44.4% Steppe-scoring Jat who looked like your typical north Indian.
Steppe doesn't make you white especially not when the rest of the ancestry is from south asian groups and the steppe is OG
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Steppe doesn't make you white especially not when the rest of the ancestry is from south asian groups and the steppe is OG
Indo iranic Steppe is very light (look at sintashta reconstructions and scythian descriptions) so it would make sense that groups high in that admixture would look much whiter then their neighbours
 
Anything higher then 20 is super atypical for non European ethnic groups (except tajiks it seems)
View attachment 3940820
Is that so? That cannot be true. I score 22% Steppe and I don't have any Steppe haplogroups, neither Y-DNA nor mtDNA. Maybe I'm using the wrong calculator. Can you get me the link for that one?
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
Steppe doesn't make you white especially not when the rest of the ancestry is from south asian groups and the steppe is OG
That's true, but the fact this guy had Steppe similar to northern Europeans and looked incredibly different from them is kinda funny in and of itself. It's the SAHG ancestry that really ruins it for people when it comes to phenotypes. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2
Indo iranic Steppe is very light (look at sintashta reconstructions and scythian descriptions) so it would make sense that groups high in that admixture would look much whiter then their neighbours
Sythians were/are shitskins with gook dna

1753066683402


Anatolian

The reason those high in steppe northern europeans are so white looking is because they are heavily mixed with the european hunters and are inbred. rors for the same reason via the caste system while for europe its because of an extremely low founder population.

The curry steppe ancestry is not remotely the same as those found in Europe because of ghost DNA / undefined populations/drift and of course different groups going there and breeding with the locals.
 
Is that so? That cannot be true. I score 22% Steppe and I don't have any Steppe haplogroups, neither Y-DNA nor mtDNA. Maybe I'm using the wrong calculator. Can you get me the link for that one?
This image is just how genetically close some Eurasian groups are to CWC, cwc it's self only has 70% steppe. It's strange that you assume the steppe all together with haplogroups as they don't matter that much individually.

What would be a steppe mtdna haplogroup ? Ik my y is j2 and my Mt is u5 which from what I read is from cromagnids
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
That's true, but the fact this guy had Steppe similar to northern Europeans and looked incredibly different from them is kinda funny in and of itself. It's the SAHG ancestry that really ruins it for people when it comes to phenotypes. :ROFLMAO:
Its because there's still a shit ton of undefined/ghost ancestry among steppe groups. Not even including the white looking steppe related people in Russia and Europe predate those in India by over a thousand years.

Steppe isn't even the whitest population of Europeans, it's the gatherers. The anatolians are equally white as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Sythians were/are shitskins with gook dna

View attachment 3940831

Anatolian

The reason those high in steppe northern europeans are so white looking is because they are heavily mixed with the european hunters and are inbred. rors for the same reason via the caste system while for europe its because of an extremely low founder population.

The curry steppe ancestry is not remotely the same as those found in Europe because of ghost DNA / undefined populations/drift and of course different groups going there and breeding with the locals.
That's absolutely incorrect about scythians as every single source has said that scythians were red headed and blue eyed, and whilst yes they had east Eurasian admixture it was incredible dependant on the individual as there is alot of varying ee admixture from close to half to absolutely 0 in some individuals.

Also Europeans steppe admixture comes from the same people as the indo iranic steppe admixture (corded ware) who were mixed with shg and such. They then split off to fatyanovo and so on.

The Indo iranic steppe is from the same population as the european one as they both stem from CWC, most Europeans just have more of the admixture.
 
This image is just how genetically close some Eurasian groups are to CWC, cwc it's self only has 70% steppe. It's strange that you assume the steppe all together with haplogroups as they don't matter that much individually.

What would be a steppe mtdna haplogroup ? Ik my y is j2 and my Mt is u5 which from what I read is from cromagnids
Because having 22% Steppe seems like a lot for someone who's South Asian and doesn't have any Steppe haplogroups, since South Asians usually have at least one Steppe haplogroup (such as R1a). Steppe mtDNA would be H, I think. Some South Asians have both R1a and H, and they also score high Steppe. Then you've got Dravidians with R1a and they score no Steppe.

Cool, my mtDNA is actually U2. Interesting to see we both have U mtDNAs, but mine is a South Asian-specific haplogroup, and not related to the Steppe peoples. Your Y-DNA is actually Caucasian, it's usually MENAs who have J2, for example.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2 and psychomandible
Steppe ancestry isnt enough to pass as white or even med for that matter, if its forced to mix with AASI dna. AASI dna is way to strong and overpowers steppe dna phenotypically.

Theres a reason why iranians have lower aryan ancestry than most middle and upper caste north indians, and yet are still lighter on average with more meditteranean and caucasoid physical features.

Thats because they have almost NO AASI, and also because they are mixed with anatolian farmer dna which is actually a whitening ancestry. high Anatolian farmer dna is the reason why levantine arabs look southern european passing, while gulf arabs look like indians cause they are overwhelmingly natufian. :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:


There is a group of people who are mainly a mixture of iranian neolithic farmer and steppe aryan dna, they are called pamiris, this is how they look:


Pamirets 650x434
The Pamiri People of Gorno Badakhshan Tajikistan  2019 The Humans Being Project 48
FPGktwvvt egahqbPJaKppNETRBjMDOyTpCJ2SEchCGhcigghLCbXHZ3wrGirMNgf6trNTN2iLUiP5SSCtp8IA
Df593e54902dac6704b26ce28e0f23e2


Pamir culture in tajikistan
BneGENERIC GBAO ETHNIC MINORITY Pamiri boy in Tajikistan 271124
Maxresdefault

Pamiri old man 1024x682
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible and Gengar
R1a not R1b
Indiana don't have R1b
Plus this man has probably anf DNA(which makes him slightly less curry than others)
Not Chad more like MTN as well
 
Its because there's still a shit ton of undefined/ghost ancestry among steppe groups. Not even including the white looking steppe related people in Russia and Europe predate those in India by over a thousand years.

Steppe isn't even the whitest population of Europeans, it's the gatherers. The anatolians are equally white as well
I think what makes MENA lighter than South Asians is because they have more ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) ancestry. Usually, the lighter people even in South Asia score higher levels of ANF compared to other South Asians. I didn't know there was ghost ancestry in Steppe groups. SAHG is also a ghost population, so that means we have at least two groups that we use as a reference with ghost ancestry.... what makes it even crazier is the third component is also one/third SAHG, meaning we're modelling South Asians with 3 ghost populations? Just fucking lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2
Steppe ancestry isnt enough to pass as white or even med for that matter, if its forced to mix with AASI dna. AASI dna is way to strong and overpowers steppe dna phenotypically.

Theres a reason why iranians have lower aryan ancestry that most middle and upper caste north indians, and yet are still lighter on average with more meditteranean and caucasoid physical features.

Thats because they have low to no aasi. And also because they are mixed with anatolian farmer dna which is actually a whitening ancestry. high Anatolian farmer dna is the reason why levantine arabs look southern european passing, while gulf arabs look like indians cause they are overwhelmingly natufian. :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:


There is a group of people who are mainly a mixture of iranian neolithic farmer and steppe aryan dna, they are called pamiris, this is how they look:


View attachment 3940890View attachment 3940892View attachment 3940893View attachment 3940894

View attachment 3940895View attachment 3940896View attachment 3940897
View attachment 3940899
Thanks for adding that part about ANF, because it confirms what I just said here:
I think what makes MENA lighter than South Asians is because they have more ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) ancestry. Usually, the lighter people even in South Asia score higher levels of ANF compared to other South Asians. I didn't know there was ghost ancestry in Steppe groups. SAHG is also a ghost population, so that means we have at least two groups that we use as a reference with ghost ancestry.... what makes it even crazier is the third component is also one/third SAHG, meaning we're modelling South Asians with 3 ghost populations? Just fucking lol.
 
R1a not R1b
Indiana don't have R1b
Plus this man has probably anf DNA(which makes him slightly less curry than others)
Not Chad more like MTN as well
"While haplogroup R1b is not common in India, certain populations do show some presence of it. The Lambadi people, for example, have a relatively high percentage, around 37%."
 
Because having 22% Steppe seems like a lot for someone who's South Asian and doesn't have any Steppe haplogroups, since South Asians usually have at least one Steppe haplogroup (such as R1a). Steppe mtDNA would be H, I think. Some South Asians have both R1a and H, and they also score high Steppe. Then you've got Dravidians with R1a and they score no Steppe.

Cool, my mtDNA is actually U2. Interesting to see we both have U mtDNAs, but mine is a South Asian-specific haplogroup, and not related to the Steppe peoples. Your Y-DNA is actually Caucasian, it's usually MENAs who have J2, for example.
I know about the y dna being caucasian derived I was more wondering about my Mt beacuse my mums ancestry is very western oriented
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Thanks for adding that part about ANF, because it confirms what I just said here:
ya anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry is actually the whitening ancestry for alot of europeans as well. ANF was actually lighter than european hunter gatheres as well. Europeans only get their blue eyes from hunter gatherers, but their skin whitening is mainly from ANF.



There are 3 neolithic farmer populations, in terms of lightest to darkest it is: Anatolian Neolithic Farmer, Neolithic Iranian Farmer, and Natufian Farmers.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and StuntmanMike
That's absolutely incorrect about scythians as every single source has said that scythians were red headed and blue eyed, and whilst yes they had east Eurasian admixture it was incredible dependant on the individual as there is alot of varying ee admixture from close to half to absolutely 0 in some individuals.

Also Europeans steppe admixture comes from the same people as the indo iranic steppe admixture (corded ware) who were mixed with shg and such. They then split off to fatyanovo and so on.

The Indo iranic steppe is from the same population as the european one as they both stem from CWC, most Europeans just have more of the admixture.
They are diverse of course, but even Libyans and Sardinians were described as light featured in the historiography. I wouldn't lay any weight on it.

The reason comparing ancestral groups to modern ones is retarded is because these samples are sparse in number and are filled with tons of undefined ancestry that don't peace together very well. Just saying that the modern scandaivians are closest genetically to steppe people of all living populations does not say even half of the pciture

Even the highest caste Indian like a Jatt or Ror is further genetically to a Swede than a Saudi Arabian or a Libyan
 
Steppe ancestry isnt enough to pass as white or even med for that matter, if its forced to mix with AASI dna. AASI dna is way to strong and overpowers steppe dna phenotypically.

Theres a reason why iranians have lower aryan ancestry than most middle and upper caste north indians, and yet are still lighter on average with more meditteranean and caucasoid physical features.

Thats because they have low to no aasi. And also because they are mixed with anatolian farmer dna which is actually a whitening ancestry. high Anatolian farmer dna is the reason why levantine arabs look southern european passing, while gulf arabs look like indians cause they are overwhelmingly natufian. :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:


There is a group of people who are mainly a mixture of iranian neolithic farmer and steppe aryan dna, they are called pamiris, this is how they look:


View attachment 3940890View attachment 3940892View attachment 3940893View attachment 3940894

View attachment 3940895View attachment 3940896View attachment 3940897
View attachment 3940899
Pamiris are tajik right ?
 
"While haplogroup R1b is not common in India, certain populations do show some presence of it. The Lambadi people, for example, have a relatively high percentage, around 37%."
Could be
However he is most likely R1a
Would be funny if he has Dravid haplogroup
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
ya anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry is actually the whitening ancestry for alot of europeans as well. ANF was actually lighter than european hunter gatheres as well. Europeans only get their blue eyes from hunter gatherers, but their skin whitening is mainly from ANF.



There are 3 neolithic farmer populations, in terms of lightest to darkest it is: Anatolian Neolithic Farmer, Neolithic Iranian Farmer, and Natufian Farmers.
Natufian farmers are close genetically to the anatolian ones
I think what makes MENA lighter than South Asians is because they have more ANF (Anatolian Neolithic Farmer) ancestry. Usually, the lighter people even in South Asia score higher levels of ANF compared to other South Asians. I didn't know there was ghost ancestry in Steppe groups. SAHG is also a ghost population, so that means we have at least two groups that we use as a reference with ghost ancestry.... what makes it even crazier is the third component is also one/third SAHG, meaning we're modelling South Asians with 3 ghost populations? Just fucking lol.
Yeah its the anatolian, because they are the biggest contributor to europeans, but you can also say the gathers are exclusive mostly to western and central europe but exist in the periphery.

The reason Arabs even saudis and yemenis are still closer to even swedes than a high class jatt is because the saudi's entire genome is basically caucasoid natufian which is like 2/3rds of the anatolian break up and the swedes carry about 1/3rd of that, which gives them a distant but steady continuum.

the ghost dna in indian steppe people as well as the general alien nature of the south eurasian dna pull them even farther. but some of that ghost DNA in the indian step is related to Iranian people and is at least partially caucasoid (probs halfway between a south and central asian). where that ghost dna doesn't show up is in groups like pashtuns which are basically a more ancient steppe + iranic ancestry
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
some pamiri illustrativedna results:



 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2
I know about the y dna being caucasian derived I was more wondering about my Mt beacuse my mums ancestry is very western oriented
Yeah, so U5 is split into U5a and U5b, one of these are found frequently in northern Europeans (Finnish people to be exact).
ya anatolian neolithic farmer ancestry is actually the whitening ancestry for alot of europeans as well. ANF was actually lighter than european hunter gatheres as well. Europeans only get their blue eyes from hunter gatherers, but their skin whitening is mainly from ANF.



There are 3 neolithic farmer populations, in terms of lightest to darkest it is: Anatolian Neolithic Farmer, Neolithic Iranian Farmer, and Natufian Farmers.
What kind of Euro HG are we talking about here, WSHG or EEHG?
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
Yeah, so U5 is split into U5a and U5b, one of these are found frequently in northern Europeans (Finnish people to be exact).

What kind of Euro HG are we talking about here, WSHG or EEHG?
Which one ? And what's the other found in
 
Yeah its the anatolian, because they are the biggest contributor to europeans, but you can also say the gathers are exclusive mostly to western and central europe but exist in the periphery.

The reason Arabs even saudis and yemenis are still closer to even swedes than a high class jatt is because the saudi's entire genome is basically caucasoid natufian which is like 2/3rds of the anatolian break up and the swedes carry about 1/3rd of that, which gives them a distant but steady continuum.

the ghost dna in indian steppe people as well as the general alien nature of the south eurasian dna pull them even farther. but some of that ghost DNA in the indian step is related to Iranian people and is at least partially caucasoid (probs halfway between a south and central asian). where that ghost dna doesn't show up is in groups like pashtuns which are basically a more ancient steppe + iranic ancestry
Brootal for Jatt bhai, still less Aryan than a Yemeni desert dweller. Luckily I'm not a Steppe guy, I'm a Farmer kanger anyway. :feelshah:

IIRC Iranic people derive their ancestry from BMAC, but not just Iranic, there's also Punjabi Arains who score very Iranic-like despite not being Iranic. It's said this comes from the BMAC link.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Manchild_v2

Similar threads

The Observant One
Replies
5
Views
352
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
Jatt
Replies
10
Views
512
True truecel
True truecel
whiteegyptian
Replies
107
Views
2K
neurosis
neurosis
expert
Replies
25
Views
496
NOCTURNALDEATH
NOCTURNALDEATH

Users who are viewing this thread

  • tolkachyov
  • RODEBLUR
Back
Top