Tbh capitalism is actually kinda sexist ngl

disillusioned

disillusioned

Kraken
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
10,185
Reputation
30,098
Hate sounding like a feminist cunt but after listening to enough rants from TFM about feminism, women, capitalism etc I can't help but wonder if maybe feminists actually have somewhat of a point about capitalism and libertarianism actually being legit unfair towards women. Basically if the free market was allowed to reign supreme women would have no choice but to whore themselves to men because they either can't take care of themselves by themselves while having children or because they aren't able to compete with men in the market place. This makes the benefits of capitalism inherently loop-sided in favor of men at the expense of women who do to the nature of their biologicy and role as child reerers would always be slaves to men in such a system.

Not saying socialist bullshit where meritocracy doesn't exist is any better, but tbh all the sexist rants from this dude has made me wonder if perhaps there is actually some small grain of truth in feminism's claims that capitalism is actually sexist. Ideally we would want a hybrid system though that is neither completely capitalist or socialist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973, Petsmart and Deleted member 2012
That’s great
 
I disagree. TFM is just a retarded libertarian Ideologue trying to make his deranged low IQ Ideology fit into gender relations. Capitalism is worse for men then women. women while find male providers to take care of them while men will be left to rot in the gutter, the literal market parallels the sexual market.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: turkproducer and Petsmart
who cares about the sexism

capitalism is shit and unfair in general

socialism all the way
 
Last edited:
I disagree. TFM is just a retarded libertarian Ideologue trying to make his deranged low IQ Ideology fit into gender relations.

I agree he is massively bluepilled about capitalism but that wasn't really my point. My point was that libertarians try to frame capitalism as being meritocratic even though the mechanics of the system inherently benefit males while putting women at a disadvantage. There is a reason 90% of women were all married in traditional families and made a laughable amount of money before the welfare state and other various forms of government intervention/regulation were enacted. Raw capitalism pretty much insures women will be poor unless they can marry some rich dude. The typical libertarian counter-argument is that women can just have a carrier like men do, but even if this worked you would just end up with a destroyed birthrate since women will breed less ultimately resulting in the collapse of society.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973
Capitalism is the best

Anything that harms foids is my best fren
 
I agree he is massively bluepilled about capitalism but that wasn't really my point. My point was that libertarians try to frame capitalism as being meritocratic even though the mechanics of the system inherently benefit males while putting women at a disadvantage. There is a reason 90% of women were all married in traditional families and made a laughable amount of money before the welfare state and other various forms of government intervention/regulation were enacted. Raw capitalism pretty much insures women will be poor unless they can marry some rich dude. The typical libertarian counter-argument is that women can just have a carrier like men do, but even if this worked you would just end up with a destroyed birthrate since women will breed less ultimately resulting in the collapse of society.
You say this like it's a bad thing
 
All I know is females were happier when they are nurturing children and having a family. (before third wave cancerism)

I do believe that being mother and caretakers of the household does limit a females contribution to the world but let’s be real, they can’t contribute as much as a man. They are less logical, emotionally driven, weak willed etc. I think ideally a family should have both parents working, but a female should be working part time and looking after the kids
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowTierNormie
benefits of capitalism inherently loop-sided in favor of men at the expense of women who do to the nature of their biologicy and role as child reerers would always be slaves to men in such a system.
 
Didn’t read but anyone who defends respects or supports females on this forum should automatically be IP banned.
 
I want to review Zuzia for you guys
Image result for i don't understand gif
Image result for i don't understand gif
Image result for i don't understand gif
Image result for i don't understand gif
 
Hate sounding like a feminist cunt but after listening to enough rants from TFM about feminism, women, capitalism etc I can't help but wonder if maybe feminists actually have somewhat of a point about capitalism and libertarianism actually being legit unfair towards women. Basically if the free market was allowed to reign supreme women would have no choice but to whore themselves to men because they either can't take care of themselves by themselves while having children or because they aren't able to compete with men in the market place. This makes the benefits of capitalism inherently loop-sided in favor of men at the expense of women who do to the nature of their biologicy and role as child reerers would always be slaves to men in such a system.

Not saying socialist bullshit where meritocracy doesn't exist is any better, but tbh all the sexist rants from this dude has made me wonder if perhaps there is actually some small grain of truth in feminism's claims that capitalism is actually sexist. Ideally we would want a hybrid system though that is neither completely capitalist or socialist.



Not really caiptailist seems to get away with priest classes socialism tends to build them up
 

Similar threads

9cel
Replies
9
Views
851
Mike141
Mike141
LegitUser
Replies
95
Views
9K
Samiscool234
Samiscool234
Acion
Replies
12
Views
1K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
Zenis
Replies
82
Views
9K
italianmaxxer
I

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top