the biggest error this site has made imo

alurmo

alurmo

NEO NARCY PIRATE (NIGHTWATCH)
Joined
May 5, 2024
Posts
29,542
Reputation
49,100
is establishing concepts like hqnp, midface law, eye laws as cemented facts, when in reality they are still infentile, we havent truly stripped these topics down to the bone, we havent even crossanalysed it wiht other faculties of aesthetics to make sure they comply with the neccessaties of nature
and dont get me started with the fact that 90% of the forum still has the notion that foids can be understood or read
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Nectar, MouthBreathingElite, 1exposed and 3 others
is establishing concepts like hqnp, midface law, eye laws as cemented facts, when in reality they are still infentile, we havent truly stripped these topics down to the bone, we havent even crossanalysed it wiht other faculties of aesthetics to make sure they comply with the neccessaties of nature
and dont get me started with the fact that 90% of the forum still has the notion that foids can be understood or read
This site didn’t establish them. Lookism established them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2s2f, DnrGriffith, MouthBreathingElite and 5 others
is establishing concepts like hqnp, midface law, eye laws as cemented facts, when in reality they are still infentile, we havent truly stripped these topics down to the bone, we havent even crossanalysed it wiht other faculties of aesthetics to make sure they comply with the neccessaties of nature
and dont get me started with the fact that 90% of the forum still has the notion that foids can be understood or read
eye area is really law though

Sean O'Pry would be homeless without his perfect eye area
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2s2f, CloudyCuck, Leo and 1 other person
This site didn’t establish them. Lookism established them.
lol looking and analysing the peaks of lookism(2016-2017 periods) shows tehy didnt even establish them, most of the time, the concepts discussed were seen as theories, and should always has stayed so
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: 2s2f, CloudyCuck, Leo and 1 other person
lol looking and analysing the peaks of lookism(2016-2017 periods) shows tehy didnt even establish them, most of the time, the concepts discussed were seen as theories, and should always has stayed so
Nigga I was on lookism in their peaks I would know
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Light_Kira, 2s2f, Heretic and 3 others
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: 2s2f, Heretic, MouthBreathingElite and 1 other person
eye area is really law though

Sean O'Pry would be homeless without his perfect eye area
lol, if sean opry wasnt seen by some giga autist boyo on myspace he wouldnt really have gotten THAT popular, opry was still bluepilled coper boyo, without a clue in the world of looks importance, he had to be taken under the wing of people who understood how looks influence(fashion designers)
but imo he would prob be a bland normie without the eye area, he still had a good jaw and good bf, i could see him get a couple slays if he was giga NT
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: 2s2f and MixedMAscendingToCL
Whats wrong with the concept of ones eye area being the most important part of their face? Makes sense no?
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2s2f and alurmo
Nigga I was on lookism in their peaks I would know
then tell me am i srs wrong?
the opinions and interpretations prob fluxuate from og user to og user bc they have adapted to the new site and the way of the new users but at best, the way i could see it was like, a proto offtopic, with less superficial talk and more looks experimenting and discussion

and to be clear, what was ur acc on there and why did u suddenly decided to come back to muh .org during late 2023 of all years
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2s2f
Whats wrong with the concept of ones eye area being the most important part of their face? Makes sense no?
was using the example to put more weight on the thread but it could be put onto the concept of many things
 
then tell me am i srs wrong?
the opinions and interpretations prob fluxuate from og user to og user bc they have adapted to the new site and the way of the new users but at best, the way i could see it was like, a proto offtopic, with less superficial talk and more looks experimenting and discussion

and to be clear, what was ur acc on there and why did u suddenly decided to come back to muh .org during late 2023 of all years
he decided to moderate org to save it from destruction
 
More like one of the biggest errors in man kind was creating this forum
 
then tell me am i srs wrong?
the opinions and interpretations prob fluxuate from og user to og user bc they have adapted to the new site and the way of the new users but at best, the way i could see it was like, a proto offtopic, with less superficial talk and more looks experimenting and discussion

and to be clear, what was ur acc on there and why did u suddenly decided to come back to muh .org during late 2023 of all years
Screenshot 2026 02 26 at 115031AM


This is the only proof I can share publicly but I have shared proof in DMs with a bunch of people in DMs.2019 was a late join date for .net but that is when I decided to make an account because you didn't need an account to lurk on there.

I came back to org after ascending and seeing how mainstream looksmaxing was getting.

Yes you 100% are wrong. They were talking about this in 2015 when I originally started lurking and even then, it wasn't a new theory.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Light_Kira and alurmo
View attachment 4701550

This is the only proof I can share publicly but I have shared proof in DMs with a bunch of people in DMs.2019 was a late join date for .net but that is when I decided to make an account because you didn't need an account to lurk on there.

I came back to org after ascending and seeing how mainstream looksmaxing was getting.

Yes you 100% are wrong. They were talking about this in 2015 when I originally started lurking and even then, it wasn't a new theory.
oof then i prob got the wrong interpretations, well anyways offtopic has gone to shit imo anyways, antiquitical threads are needed to further the site
tired of low iq niggers
 
  • +1
Reactions: Light_Kira and TechnoBoss

Similar threads

Futur_streamerr
Replies
157
Views
937
LTNUser
LTNUser
iqi
Replies
30
Views
1K
reccesedmtn
reccesedmtn
Vass
Replies
28
Views
1K
Societal Reject
Societal Reject
VrillFatNoob24
Replies
29
Views
2K
psltristan1
psltristan1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top