disillusioned
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 10,339
- Reputation
- 30,592
Redpillers/mgtowers can't accept that women just don't need them anymore and that their capitalism/libertarian ideology is becoming less and less relevant, and thus they try to cope with this bullshit narrative about feminism being unsustainable because of low birthrates and that feminism will cause western society to collapse after a while as a result effectively ending feminism and female rights. And sure enough, that sounds like a credible prediction at first glance. After all, somebody needs to pay for all of that welfare.
But there is one major failing in their argument that ultimately destroys it: Automation. Yes it's true that birthrates are declining and that more immigrants are coming into the west to make up for it, but the rate at which technology and AI will replace jobs will probably end up being even faster. Take for example Japan. The overwhelming majority of Japan is still Japanese but their birthrate is terrible. And yet, even if they started importing migrants for a while in as little as a few decades from now they would just stop doing it because AI and robots will make it pointless to import more of them.
Fact is, there isn't going to be any collapse. Once AI forces most people on welfare there will be no reason for why feminism can't simply continue existing forever. Redpill and libertarian values will be completely useless by then. You could have 120 IQ and be super hard working and you would still have no meaningful social advantage over anybody else because AI is ultimately still smarter than you. "The collapse" is cope. There isn't going to be any collapse. What is more likely to happen is that society will merely devolve into a horrible dystopian nightmare where a corrupt ruling class of robot owners control all the sheeple living on welfare.
There won't be any collapse. There won't be any end to feminism. Collapse theory is just mgtow cope.
EDIT: I see somebody added an extra tag to my thread. Very mature. Not sure why I still bother with these forums honestly. Oh wait I don't I tried to get banned recently but wasn't allowed to do so.
But there is one major failing in their argument that ultimately destroys it: Automation. Yes it's true that birthrates are declining and that more immigrants are coming into the west to make up for it, but the rate at which technology and AI will replace jobs will probably end up being even faster. Take for example Japan. The overwhelming majority of Japan is still Japanese but their birthrate is terrible. And yet, even if they started importing migrants for a while in as little as a few decades from now they would just stop doing it because AI and robots will make it pointless to import more of them.
Fact is, there isn't going to be any collapse. Once AI forces most people on welfare there will be no reason for why feminism can't simply continue existing forever. Redpill and libertarian values will be completely useless by then. You could have 120 IQ and be super hard working and you would still have no meaningful social advantage over anybody else because AI is ultimately still smarter than you. "The collapse" is cope. There isn't going to be any collapse. What is more likely to happen is that society will merely devolve into a horrible dystopian nightmare where a corrupt ruling class of robot owners control all the sheeple living on welfare.
There won't be any collapse. There won't be any end to feminism. Collapse theory is just mgtow cope.
EDIT: I see somebody added an extra tag to my thread. Very mature. Not sure why I still bother with these forums honestly. Oh wait I don't I tried to get banned recently but wasn't allowed to do so.
Last edited: