A
A23ghskung
Gold
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2022
- Posts
- 760
- Reputation
- 600
in life there’s two choices are you content with your life choices or not.
Whatever that answer is, it’s binary can you do something about it or no.
Generally humans have a self innate ability to know respectively their strength and weaknesses.
Most people know subconsciously they can’t become a [insert]. According to statistics their subconscious is right.
{For exemple according to studies 1% of HS basketball players make it to college basketball. This 4000 out of 500000 high school basketball players.}
this right here is a cherry picked exemple that is true for every discipline. We are proving using the statistics above that there is a deterministic nature about who makes it to [insert] at high level.
And how exactly is it demonstrating the determinism of life. Well at any given task there are those who succeed and fail, regardless of the outcome, many individuals have different perceptions of why that specific outcome played out the way it did.
For exemple winners may believe they have [insert quality or attribute] because [ insert x reason] that contributed to them winning
Now here is where it gets surprising. Losers have the same reasoning they may believe they have [insert quality or attribute] because [ insert x reason] that contributed to them losing.
the metaphor to characterize their reasoning mantra is it’s the same coin but a different face.
bear with me here, what differentiates losers and winners is how they justify why [insert x outcome] played out the way it did.
you are probably seeing where this is going … but if you did not just remember this.
When individuals can not compete in [insert x discipline] they cope and find [insert x reason] why they can not compete
In short the individuals believes he lost because it’s not his fault ===> it’s somebody else fault ===> maybe somebody is against me ===> maybe that same somebody did [insert x action] ] ====> somebody … [insert x random reason]
It makes the individual feel better about himself, that if he lost it’s because the game is rigged and somehow there’s nothing he could have done. Because it’s not his fault.
Women act like this , they will break a glass, and blame the one who put it there, if they’re the one who put it there, they will blame the one who made them buy it, etc
See this is why many people are content with their subhumans life, working 9-5, living paycheck to paycheck.
But the final note is this those who understand will understand. Doctorate level quantum physics looks like Chinese gibberish to the average mind, but to the trained mind its like reading a sonnet from the nicest of poets.
Whatever that answer is, it’s binary can you do something about it or no.
Generally humans have a self innate ability to know respectively their strength and weaknesses.
Most people know subconsciously they can’t become a [insert]. According to statistics their subconscious is right.
{For exemple according to studies 1% of HS basketball players make it to college basketball. This 4000 out of 500000 high school basketball players.}
this right here is a cherry picked exemple that is true for every discipline. We are proving using the statistics above that there is a deterministic nature about who makes it to [insert] at high level.
And how exactly is it demonstrating the determinism of life. Well at any given task there are those who succeed and fail, regardless of the outcome, many individuals have different perceptions of why that specific outcome played out the way it did.
For exemple winners may believe they have [insert quality or attribute] because [ insert x reason] that contributed to them winning
Now here is where it gets surprising. Losers have the same reasoning they may believe they have [insert quality or attribute] because [ insert x reason] that contributed to them losing.
the metaphor to characterize their reasoning mantra is it’s the same coin but a different face.
bear with me here, what differentiates losers and winners is how they justify why [insert x outcome] played out the way it did.
you are probably seeing where this is going … but if you did not just remember this.
When individuals can not compete in [insert x discipline] they cope and find [insert x reason] why they can not compete
In short the individuals believes he lost because it’s not his fault ===> it’s somebody else fault ===> maybe somebody is against me ===> maybe that same somebody did [insert x action] ] ====> somebody … [insert x random reason]
It makes the individual feel better about himself, that if he lost it’s because the game is rigged and somehow there’s nothing he could have done. Because it’s not his fault.
Women act like this , they will break a glass, and blame the one who put it there, if they’re the one who put it there, they will blame the one who made them buy it, etc
See this is why many people are content with their subhumans life, working 9-5, living paycheck to paycheck.
But the final note is this those who understand will understand. Doctorate level quantum physics looks like Chinese gibberish to the average mind, but to the trained mind its like reading a sonnet from the nicest of poets.
