Manana
Gold
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2023
- Posts
- 999
- Reputation
- 2,203
It's well known that women can't have falios in modern dating, excluding big deformities.
But why?
Sex drive and hypergamy
Sex drive completely ruins dating for many reasons (supply-demand issue as main). Sex drive + hypergamy (both biological) is why chads are so rare and desirable. This is also why men are so easily discarded on falios. Women require better looking mating partners because their sex drive is lower (they need better looking partners on average to get stimulated) and sex comes with more consequences (risk of pregnancy). Water I know, altough some here believe foids have equal sex drive on average
.
Poor mandible projection and chin recession
These are regular falios, more people have recessed lower thirds than developed.
Both are correlated and are poor health indicators (indicating poor breathing canals); which genetically makes sense to not be desirable in mate selection for both genders.
However, because it's a submissive facial trait , making individuals look tame, weak and unopposing, it's again favouring women.
It's almost ideal for female sex appeal (men want to be the protectors just as much as foids want to be protected and cared for), yet a death sentance for men who need to be as masculine as possible for maximum SMV (some pretty boys and blacks can get away with this falio, but it's rare.)
Lower third is extremely important for male sex appeal. Good luck slaying with this falio.
Here are some of the most desired females with this falio;
Natalie Dormer
Scarlett Johansson
Johansson looks recessed from these angles, would be called MTB here, yet has infinite SMV irl. Why? This image will help you understand.
Her tits (body) are suddenly haloing everything. Combined with the blonde hair and no clear falios from the frontal view; you can now understand her appeal more. Keep in mind there is nothing striking (or special) about her face. This is not rare genetic material.
She is slightly recessed - leaning submissive (almost ideal), with good features, no clear falios (for women), on an above average body and that's infinite SMV for foids.
So now we established that poor breathing canals can even be favourable for women; let's continue.
Negative cantal tilt and other eye area falios
NCT is asocciated with aging, and is therefore an undesirable feature for both genders by default.
Great example here is again a famous blonde - Syndey Sweeney
Truecel eye area. Combo of NCT, bad ipd, shit uee; brutal (disgusting) bug eyes.
I have heard multiple women call her beautiful. How? Because as a woman you are 10× more likely to have 1 feature haloing every facial deformity imaginable.
99.99 % of men would fuck her looking like this. Her body is again haloing everything (if you can even look at anything else).
Her truecel eye area suddenly looks slutty and exotic in the best way possible.
It's because we are biologically determined to look for as many sexual partners as possible. We change goalposts because we look for attractive features in women. While foids do the exact opposite for men.
Okay I gave 2 example of blonde + tits (kind of unfair of me) so let's continue...
With another overrated blonde
This one has no tits tho
It is easy for women to get haloed by one feature
1 striking feature (not even as rare/desirable as Sweeney's tits) is enough for infinite SMV.
A good example here is:
Jennifer Aniston
Here is Jennifer Aniston getting brutally mogged by Pitt in a candid photograph.
Aniston has such a brutal combo of facial deformities. Bad ipd, weird narrow jaw shape and basically no lips (imagine how Brad felt finally kissing someone with lips when he cheated on her with Jolie (extremely based Brad ngl)).
So how can you possible be considered a sex symbol looking like this (and it's not just the media)?
Do you have any idea? Why did she lose so much appeal from season 1 of Friends to the latter seasons?
This is young Jen, pre Friends/fame. What is wrong here (except everything)?
It's the hair. This hairstly doesn't suit her and it certainly can't halo everything. You probably know many women who have insane SMV based on hair alone.
How do you feel about her here?
This is an ideal hairstyle for her (she has above average hait tbf) and it suddenly haloes everything.
She looks young, neotenous, innocent and like she needs help/guidance(all ideal for sex appeal).
Her facial falios become less visible because we again get cucked by biology. Be honest with yourself, do you consider her very attractive now?
This is season 4 Aniston
Hair is haloing again, but not to the levels as in season 1. She lost half the appeal with worse hair because it is less of a halo now (facial features are the same and she aged only 3 years)
Back to season 1
I don't give a fuck about your copes this would get stacy treatment everywhere.
Why is it so much harder for men to be haloed by 1 feature?
Because women look for deformities while we look for reasons to fuck. It's a hard wired biological - mindset issue we can't fix.
Many will probably list Jacob Elordi as someone who has NCT and infinite SMV. Elordi is almost 2 m tall with perfect frame, big skull, long chin, great eyebrows and hair.
He has 3+ halos, including top 1 % height + frame. Do these females come into the same percanteges genetically? Sweeney's tits do tbh but her face is far worse than Elordi's, even with all the fakeup in the world.
Elordi effortlessly mogging Sweeney
All of this is also why asian women SMV mog asian men to self harm.
They have similair skulls with same falios. Poor mandible and upper maxilla projection and shit eye area, with unideal bodies (men too short and women not curvy enough).
You again found neoteny and other attractive features in this recessed gook instinctively in a split of a second
That's why men like everything in women, from fat to skinny, from short to long hair and from white to black skin.
While women biologically only want tall, dark and handsome (extremely rare in that combination, especially considering that by handsome they mean perfect frame and facial structure).
We established what it takes for women to stand out.
1 rare halo + any falio (except long midface) = stacy treatment
1 decent halo + no big falios = stacy treatment
What it takes for men to stand out?
Perfect height, frame, colouring, facial structure, lower third, hair, skin. Ideally all of these in top 0.1% like the biggest mogger of all time; Vasily Stepanov.
Conclusion
Sex drive, hypergamy and other biological factors make all the difference in how we percieve opposite sex and they ultimately control dating (and our lives).
Most facial deformities have submissive conotations which is again favouring foids.
You can't win, they destroy us on all fronts.
How much must a regular man change to counter these issues? He can't. Not even you can with all the knowledge (and anger) about this subject. It's not possible.
The root of the problem is biological, it's too deep, and with how dating is progressing it can, and will only get worse.
It's so over if you are born as man.
I know all of this is water but I also think a lot of users like reading interactive threads like this one.
But why?
Sex drive and hypergamy
Sex drive completely ruins dating for many reasons (supply-demand issue as main). Sex drive + hypergamy (both biological) is why chads are so rare and desirable. This is also why men are so easily discarded on falios. Women require better looking mating partners because their sex drive is lower (they need better looking partners on average to get stimulated) and sex comes with more consequences (risk of pregnancy). Water I know, altough some here believe foids have equal sex drive on average
.Poor mandible projection and chin recession
These are regular falios, more people have recessed lower thirds than developed.
Both are correlated and are poor health indicators (indicating poor breathing canals); which genetically makes sense to not be desirable in mate selection for both genders.
However, because it's a submissive facial trait , making individuals look tame, weak and unopposing, it's again favouring women.
It's almost ideal for female sex appeal (men want to be the protectors just as much as foids want to be protected and cared for), yet a death sentance for men who need to be as masculine as possible for maximum SMV (some pretty boys and blacks can get away with this falio, but it's rare.)
Lower third is extremely important for male sex appeal. Good luck slaying with this falio.
Here are some of the most desired females with this falio;
Natalie Dormer
Scarlett Johansson
Johansson looks recessed from these angles, would be called MTB here, yet has infinite SMV irl. Why? This image will help you understand.
Her tits (body) are suddenly haloing everything. Combined with the blonde hair and no clear falios from the frontal view; you can now understand her appeal more. Keep in mind there is nothing striking (or special) about her face. This is not rare genetic material.
She is slightly recessed - leaning submissive (almost ideal), with good features, no clear falios (for women), on an above average body and that's infinite SMV for foids.
So now we established that poor breathing canals can even be favourable for women; let's continue.
Negative cantal tilt and other eye area falios
NCT is asocciated with aging, and is therefore an undesirable feature for both genders by default.
Great example here is again a famous blonde - Syndey Sweeney
Truecel eye area. Combo of NCT, bad ipd, shit uee; brutal (disgusting) bug eyes.
I have heard multiple women call her beautiful. How? Because as a woman you are 10× more likely to have 1 feature haloing every facial deformity imaginable.
99.99 % of men would fuck her looking like this. Her body is again haloing everything (if you can even look at anything else
).Her truecel eye area suddenly looks slutty and exotic in the best way possible.
It's because we are biologically determined to look for as many sexual partners as possible. We change goalposts because we look for attractive features in women. While foids do the exact opposite for men.
Okay I gave 2 example of blonde + tits (kind of unfair of me
) so let's continue...With another overrated blonde
This one has no tits tho
It is easy for women to get haloed by one feature
1 striking feature (not even as rare/desirable as Sweeney's tits
) is enough for infinite SMV.A good example here is:
Jennifer Aniston
Here is Jennifer Aniston getting brutally mogged by Pitt in a candid photograph.
Aniston has such a brutal combo of facial deformities. Bad ipd, weird narrow jaw shape and basically no lips (imagine how Brad felt finally kissing someone with lips when he cheated on her with Jolie (extremely based Brad ngl)).
So how can you possible be considered a sex symbol looking like this (and it's not just the media)?
Do you have any idea? Why did she lose so much appeal from season 1 of Friends to the latter seasons?
This is young Jen, pre Friends/fame. What is wrong here (except everything
)?It's the hair. This hairstly doesn't suit her and it certainly can't halo everything. You probably know many women who have insane SMV based on hair alone.
How do you feel about her here?
This is an ideal hairstyle for her (she has above average hait tbf) and it suddenly haloes everything.
She looks young, neotenous, innocent and like she needs help/guidance(all ideal for sex appeal).
Her facial falios become less visible because we again get cucked by biology. Be honest with yourself, do you consider her very attractive now?
This is season 4 Aniston
Hair is haloing again, but not to the levels as in season 1. She lost half the appeal with worse hair because it is less of a halo now (facial features are the same and she aged only 3 years)
Back to season 1
I don't give a fuck about your copes this would get stacy treatment everywhere.
Why is it so much harder for men to be haloed by 1 feature?
Because women look for deformities while we look for reasons to fuck. It's a hard wired biological - mindset issue we can't fix.
Many will probably list Jacob Elordi as someone who has NCT and infinite SMV. Elordi is almost 2 m tall with perfect frame, big skull, long chin, great eyebrows and hair.
He has 3+ halos, including top 1 % height + frame. Do these females come into the same percanteges genetically? Sweeney's tits do tbh
but her face is far worse than Elordi's, even with all the fakeup in the world.Elordi effortlessly mogging Sweeney
All of this is also why asian women SMV mog asian men to self harm.
They have similair skulls with same falios. Poor mandible and upper maxilla projection and shit eye area, with unideal bodies (men too short and women not curvy enough).
You again found neoteny and other attractive features in this recessed gook instinctively in a split of a second
That's why men like everything in women, from fat to skinny, from short to long hair and from white to black skin.
While women biologically only want tall, dark and handsome (extremely rare in that combination, especially considering that by handsome they mean perfect frame and facial structure
).We established what it takes for women to stand out.
1 rare halo + any falio (except long midface) = stacy treatment
1 decent halo + no big falios = stacy treatment
What it takes for men to stand out?
Perfect height, frame, colouring, facial structure, lower third, hair, skin. Ideally all of these in top 0.1% like the biggest mogger of all time; Vasily Stepanov.
Conclusion
Sex drive, hypergamy and other biological factors make all the difference in how we percieve opposite sex and they ultimately control dating (and our lives).
Most facial deformities have submissive conotations which is again favouring foids.
You can't win, they destroy us on all fronts.
How much must a regular man change to counter these issues? He can't. Not even you can with all the knowledge (and anger) about this subject. It's not possible.
The root of the problem is biological, it's too deep, and with how dating is progressing it can, and will only get worse.
It's so over if you are born as man.
I know all of this is water but I also think a lot of users like reading interactive threads like this one.
Last edited:
