The evil nature of the God of the bible

[yandex99]

7What then? What Israel was seeking, it failed to obtain, but the elect did. The others were hardened, 8as it is written: “God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that could not see, and ears that could not hear, to this very day.”…Romans 11

8 Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying:

“Whom shall I send,
And who will go for Us?”

Then I said, “Here am I! Send me.”

9 And He said, “Go, and tell this people:

‘Keep on hearing, but do not understand;
Keep on seeing, but do not perceive.’

10 “Make the heart of this people dull,
And their ears heavy,
And shut their eyes;
Lest they see with their eyes,
And hear with their ears,
And understand with their heart,
And return and be healed.”

11 Then I said, “Lord, how long?”

And He answered:

“Until the cities are laid waste and without inhabitant,
The houses are without a man,
The land is utterly desolate,
12 The Lord has removed men far away,
And the forsaken places are many in the midst of the land.
13 But yet a tenth will be in it,
And will return and be for consuming,
As a terebinth tree or as an oak,
Whose stump remains when it is cut down.
So the holy seed shall be its stump.”
כא הָכִינוּ לְבָנָיו מַטְבֵּחַ, בַּעֲוֺן אֲבוֹתָם; בַּל-יָקֻמוּ וְיָרְשׁוּ אָרֶץ, וּמָלְאוּ פְנֵי-תֵבֵל עָרִים. 21 Prepare ye slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they rise not up, and possess the earth, and fill the face of the world with cities.
כב וְקַמְתִּי עֲלֵיהֶם, נְאֻם יְהוָה צְבָאוֹת; וְהִכְרַתִּי לְבָבֶל שֵׁם וּשְׁאָר, וְנִין וָנֶכֶד--נְאֻם-יְהוָה. 22 And I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon name and remnant, and offshoot and offspring, saith the LORD.

כו וָאֲטַמֵּא אוֹתָם בְּמַתְּנוֹתָם, בְּהַעֲבִיר כָּל-פֶּטֶר רָחַם: לְמַעַן אֲשִׁמֵּם--לְמַעַן אֲשֶׁר יֵדְעוּ, אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי יְהוָה. {ס} 26 and I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they set apart all that openeth the womb, that I might destroy them, to the end that they might know that I am the LORD. {S}

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

I will feed those who oppress you with their own flesh, And they shall be drunk with their own blood as with sweet wine. All flesh shall know That I, the LORD, am your Savior, And your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.

DON'T THE PENTECOSTALS SAY THAT IF YOU DRINK COCA COLA OR EAT MCDONALDFS YOURE GOING TO HELL BECAUSE CANNIBALISM IS A SIN?AND THEY ALLEGE THESE HAVE HUMAN PARTS IN THEM?

ssage:

8 And then shall that wicked one be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming —9 even him, whose coming is according to the working of Satan, with all power and signs and lying wonders (2 Thess 2:8-9 21st Cent KJV) 10 and with all deceivableness and delusion." [Author's version of v. 10.]

This author of the Christian Intelligencer article then points out that "even him" in the above quote was added by the KJV. The KJV editors identified these words were interpolated by putting them in italics. The KJV editors' intention in doing so, the author explains, was to deflect, if possible, that Paul literally means Jesus will come with deceptive signs and lying wonders. This will become an example the author hopes to convince us to add more words elsewhere to deflect the blasphemy by Paul in 2 Thess. 2:10-13 as he identified above. The author writes:

And who is it that is thus described? Open your Bible reader and know whether the answer be correct. We assert, that omitting the first two words, in the ninth verse -- even him -- which are printed in italic, to designate an interpolation, or that they were added by the translators, the literal reading is that the Lord Jesus is the personage spoken of! Look for yourself. Unless we supply some words, Jesus is the character spoken of, whose coming is after the working of Satan, with lying wonders and all delusions. To read and understand it without an addition would be deemed by many as blasphemous, because it ascribes the deception to the Son of God!" Id., at 61.

To justify adding words to change the sense, this author continues to expose the literal meaning of the passage as currently written. He ties verses 10 and 11 together by rendering the same word in Greek by the same word in English of "delusion" so Paul's parallelism is more clear. (The KJV obscured the parallelism evident in the Greek original by using different English nouns.) The author then explains that the delusion God supposedly brings in verse 11 ties back to the delusion that Jesus as God's agent will bring in verse 9:

But, look for a moment. Is it worse to suppose that he whom the Father has sent is a deceiver, than that his God sends strong delusion? The same word that is rendered deceivableness [in the KJV of v. 10] is rendered delusion in the 11th. These words are perfectly synonymous....We think it will appear evident to those who are not fettered by education and prejudice, that the same character and the same deception is intended in both cases. We mean that he who is coming is with all deceivableness or delusion, sends the same in its strength, to make men believe a lie. If the God spoken about in verse 11 means our Father in heaven, we should honor the Son as we honor the Father, in calling Him the agent by which it was effected; and the literal, unaltered words will support us in so doing....We are told that it is God who sends the delusion." Id., at 61.

The author then alludes to Paul's responsibility for these words: "But the mysterious iniquities of the god of whom Paul wrote, had already began their operation." Id., at 62.

The author's solution is to say Paul's reference to God means instead Satan. It is the 'that god' (of this world, which words he proposes to add to 'fix' the text) who brings a strong delusion.

Thus, Paul is blasphemous unless we read into the text of verse 11 "that god" / satan -- words not there and a meaning betrayed by the passage itself. For even this change does not solve v. 9 because it still says Jesus comes with lying wonders. The KJV adding "even him" actually did not alter that meaning; "even him" just separated the thought a bit to break up the clarity of the verse. So it is not resolved by adding "that god" (small 'g') to verse 11.

For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet he did not sin.

(NOTE:TO BE TEMPTED IS TO BE LED BY THE DEVIL ACCORDING TO JAMES,COVETING SINS IS A SIN AND JESUS COVETED SINS BY BEING TEMPTED)

[9] And if the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the LORD have deceived that prophet, and I will stretch out my hand upon him, and will destroy him from the midst of my people Israel.
If one reads Jeremiah 23:39 nobody would see anything wrong with the verse. One would not even look over it again and just skip over the next verse. But if we read what is written in the Hebrew language and the word that is used, you would be shocked how the Bible translations all cover up the actual meaning for the passage. All Bible translations for Jeremiah 23:39 have this:

King James 2000 Bible Jeremiah 23:39 Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget (Nasha) you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence:

The Hebrew word ‘Nasha’ has the following meanings:

• 1) to beguile, deceive
• A)(Niphal) to be beguiled
• B)(Hiphil) to beguile, deceive
• C)(Qal) utterly (infinitive)

As you have read the word ‘Nasha’ means deceive, beguile and so forth. But when we read English Bible translations for Jer. 23:39 all of them use the word ‘forget?’ Why don’t they give the true meaning, why do they have distort the verse and lie to people? Let’s now bring forth evidence from Hebrew Lexicons for the word ‘Nasha’ and see what the true meaning is. Before we proceed further let’s first show The Hebrew word “Nasha” :



As you seen the picture I have put a red arrow what the Hebrew ‘Nasha’ looks like. Hebrew Lexicons on the word ‘Nasha’.

Professor Edward Robinson
[10]

Francis Brown

[11]

William Robertson

If one reads the above picture where I have highlighted in yellow George Wigram connects the Hebrew word ‘Nasha’ to Jeremiah 23:39. It’s clear from all the above references that Yahweh admits that he deceives people.

Professor Mark Roncace comments on Jeremiah 23:39, says the following,

“The word… itself has certain connotations and echoes in the book of Jeremiah where it appears four other times (4:10; 23:39; 29:8; 49:16). In 4:10 the prophet accuses Yahweh of deception by promising peace and then bringing destruction. Thus, one would as John calvin suggested see the withdrawal of Babylonians as ‘God for a time permit[ting]’ the people ‘to be deceived by fortunate event’ (Commentaries on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah and the Lamentations [ed. And trans. John Owen; 5 vols.; Grand rapids: Eerdmans, 1950], 4:367). In fact, in 23:39 Yahweh declares ‘I will deceive (Nasha) you and cast you away from my presence.’ One wonders if deception originates within oneself, as 37:9 suggests, or with Yahweh?” [15]

It is clear crystal from all this evidence that Yahweh is a deceiver. When the verse (Jeremiah 23:39) is not distorted, it reads like this:

Jeremiah 23:39 Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly DECEIVE (Nasha) you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence.

so yahweh IS A COVETOUS UNHOLY DECEPTIVE UNJUST 'GOD'

 

[Daqirius]

Slaughter your daughters - god is an incel confirmed